How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?
The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkshi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical teacher 2005-08, Vol.27 (5), p.445-449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 449 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | Medical teacher |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Weiss, Patrice M. Koller, Craig A. Hess, L. Wayne Wasser, Thomas |
description | The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01421590500046999 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57086116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68562261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kuHA3mky-JigUKWqFQqEodBcymcRJzUyuOTNc-u9NuReKlerqEM7zvHDyIvSSkreUdOQdobylQhNBCOFSa_0IbSiXsqGdunqMNrf7pgJXR-gZwHWlhNbiKTqiknKltN6gy7O8w0PGkx-iswnDsg5-XjD4FBoL4AGm-gbs8rS1xeNdXEa8jD4WHOJcDZd8-Qlj3OIfxQ4eTp6jJ8Em8C8O8xh9__zp2-lZc37x5evpx_PGcdkuDet6zhkZem-F4n3oFAnBKq5aqYXkjA-cKc8IcV70PfVMi55rxyvCetVpdoze7HO3Jf9aPSxmiuB8Snb2eQUjOyHbVtL_gkKRTlIqK_j6Hnid11KPBNMy1vJOUF4huodcyQDFB7MtcbLlxlBibmsxf9VSnVeH4LWvP31nHHqowIc9EOeQy2R3uaTBLPYm5RKKnV0Ew_6V__4PffQ2LaOrfd1d8LD9G9gGrAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233248514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Weiss, Patrice M. ; Koller, Craig A. ; Hess, L. Wayne ; Wasser, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Patrice M. ; Koller, Craig A. ; Hess, L. Wayne ; Wasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01421590500046999</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16147799</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MEDTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Clinical Clerkship ; Clinical Competence ; Communication Skills ; Correlation ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Measurement ; Grading ; Gynecology - education ; Humans ; Language Skills ; Medical schools ; Medical Students ; Obstetrics - education ; Pennsylvania ; Problem Solving ; Schools, Medical ; Self evaluation ; Self-Assessment ; Self-Evaluation Programs ; Selfassessment ; Statistical analysis ; Student attitudes ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Technical skills ; True Scores</subject><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2005-08, Vol.27 (5), p.445-449</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01421590500046999$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01421590500046999$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,59620,59726,60409,60515,61194,61229,61375,61410</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16147799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, L. Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Clinical Clerkship</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Obstetrics - education</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Schools, Medical</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Self-Evaluation Programs</subject><subject>Selfassessment</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Technical skills</subject><subject>True Scores</subject><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kuHA3mky-JigUKWqFQqEodBcymcRJzUyuOTNc-u9NuReKlerqEM7zvHDyIvSSkreUdOQdobylQhNBCOFSa_0IbSiXsqGdunqMNrf7pgJXR-gZwHWlhNbiKTqiknKltN6gy7O8w0PGkx-iswnDsg5-XjD4FBoL4AGm-gbs8rS1xeNdXEa8jD4WHOJcDZd8-Qlj3OIfxQ4eTp6jJ8Em8C8O8xh9__zp2-lZc37x5evpx_PGcdkuDet6zhkZem-F4n3oFAnBKq5aqYXkjA-cKc8IcV70PfVMi55rxyvCetVpdoze7HO3Jf9aPSxmiuB8Snb2eQUjOyHbVtL_gkKRTlIqK_j6Hnid11KPBNMy1vJOUF4huodcyQDFB7MtcbLlxlBibmsxf9VSnVeH4LWvP31nHHqowIc9EOeQy2R3uaTBLPYm5RKKnV0Ew_6V__4PffQ2LaOrfd1d8LD9G9gGrAY</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Weiss, Patrice M.</creator><creator>Koller, Craig A.</creator><creator>Hess, L. Wayne</creator><creator>Wasser, Thomas</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</title><author>Weiss, Patrice M. ; Koller, Craig A. ; Hess, L. Wayne ; Wasser, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Clinical Clerkship</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Obstetrics - education</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Schools, Medical</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Self-Evaluation Programs</topic><topic>Selfassessment</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Technical skills</topic><topic>True Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, L. Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiss, Patrice M.</au><au>Koller, Craig A.</au><au>Hess, L. Wayne</au><au>Wasser, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>445-449</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><coden>MEDTDX</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16147799</pmid><doi>10.1080/01421590500046999</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-159X |
ispartof | Medical teacher, 2005-08, Vol.27 (5), p.445-449 |
issn | 0142-159X 1466-187X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57086116 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Academic achievement Clinical Clerkship Clinical Competence Communication Skills Correlation Education, Medical, Undergraduate Educational Measurement Grading Gynecology - education Humans Language Skills Medical schools Medical Students Obstetrics - education Pennsylvania Problem Solving Schools, Medical Self evaluation Self-Assessment Self-Evaluation Programs Selfassessment Statistical analysis Student attitudes Students, Medical - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Technical skills True Scores |
title | How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T13%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20medical%20student%20self-assessments%20compare%20with%20their%20final%20clerkship%20grades?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Weiss,%20Patrice%20M.&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=445-449&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft.coden=MEDTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01421590500046999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68562261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233248514&rft_id=info:pmid/16147799&rfr_iscdi=true |