How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?

The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkshi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical teacher 2005-08, Vol.27 (5), p.445-449
Hauptverfasser: Weiss, Patrice M., Koller, Craig A., Hess, L. Wayne, Wasser, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 449
container_issue 5
container_start_page 445
container_title Medical teacher
container_volume 27
creator Weiss, Patrice M.
Koller, Craig A.
Hess, L. Wayne
Wasser, Thomas
description The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01421590500046999
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57086116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68562261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kuHA3mky-JigUKWqFQqEodBcymcRJzUyuOTNc-u9NuReKlerqEM7zvHDyIvSSkreUdOQdobylQhNBCOFSa_0IbSiXsqGdunqMNrf7pgJXR-gZwHWlhNbiKTqiknKltN6gy7O8w0PGkx-iswnDsg5-XjD4FBoL4AGm-gbs8rS1xeNdXEa8jD4WHOJcDZd8-Qlj3OIfxQ4eTp6jJ8Em8C8O8xh9__zp2-lZc37x5evpx_PGcdkuDet6zhkZem-F4n3oFAnBKq5aqYXkjA-cKc8IcV70PfVMi55rxyvCetVpdoze7HO3Jf9aPSxmiuB8Snb2eQUjOyHbVtL_gkKRTlIqK_j6Hnid11KPBNMy1vJOUF4huodcyQDFB7MtcbLlxlBibmsxf9VSnVeH4LWvP31nHHqowIc9EOeQy2R3uaTBLPYm5RKKnV0Ew_6V__4PffQ2LaOrfd1d8LD9G9gGrAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233248514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Weiss, Patrice M. ; Koller, Craig A. ; Hess, L. Wayne ; Wasser, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Patrice M. ; Koller, Craig A. ; Hess, L. Wayne ; Wasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01421590500046999</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16147799</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MEDTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Clinical Clerkship ; Clinical Competence ; Communication Skills ; Correlation ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Measurement ; Grading ; Gynecology - education ; Humans ; Language Skills ; Medical schools ; Medical Students ; Obstetrics - education ; Pennsylvania ; Problem Solving ; Schools, Medical ; Self evaluation ; Self-Assessment ; Self-Evaluation Programs ; Selfassessment ; Statistical analysis ; Student attitudes ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Technical skills ; True Scores</subject><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2005-08, Vol.27 (5), p.445-449</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01421590500046999$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01421590500046999$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,59620,59726,60409,60515,61194,61229,61375,61410</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16147799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, L. Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Clinical Clerkship</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Obstetrics - education</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Schools, Medical</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Self-Evaluation Programs</subject><subject>Selfassessment</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Technical skills</subject><subject>True Scores</subject><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9lr9AW4kuHA3mky-JigUKWqFQqEodBcymcRJzUyuOTNc-u9NuReKlerqEM7zvHDyIvSSkreUdOQdobylQhNBCOFSa_0IbSiXsqGdunqMNrf7pgJXR-gZwHWlhNbiKTqiknKltN6gy7O8w0PGkx-iswnDsg5-XjD4FBoL4AGm-gbs8rS1xeNdXEa8jD4WHOJcDZd8-Qlj3OIfxQ4eTp6jJ8Em8C8O8xh9__zp2-lZc37x5evpx_PGcdkuDet6zhkZem-F4n3oFAnBKq5aqYXkjA-cKc8IcV70PfVMi55rxyvCetVpdoze7HO3Jf9aPSxmiuB8Snb2eQUjOyHbVtL_gkKRTlIqK_j6Hnid11KPBNMy1vJOUF4huodcyQDFB7MtcbLlxlBibmsxf9VSnVeH4LWvP31nHHqowIc9EOeQy2R3uaTBLPYm5RKKnV0Ew_6V__4PffQ2LaOrfd1d8LD9G9gGrAY</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Weiss, Patrice M.</creator><creator>Koller, Craig A.</creator><creator>Hess, L. Wayne</creator><creator>Wasser, Thomas</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</title><author>Weiss, Patrice M. ; Koller, Craig A. ; Hess, L. Wayne ; Wasser, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-38b4430dbea574bf870ffa74726956434d437e300ce5bb1e395b49c4a743b7893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Clinical Clerkship</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Obstetrics - education</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Schools, Medical</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Self-Evaluation Programs</topic><topic>Selfassessment</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Technical skills</topic><topic>True Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Patrice M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koller, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, L. Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiss, Patrice M.</au><au>Koller, Craig A.</au><au>Hess, L. Wayne</au><au>Wasser, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>445-449</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><coden>MEDTDX</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine how a medical student's self-assessment at the completion of the third-year Ob gyn clerkship compares with the institution's final grades at Lehigh Valley Hospital. From November 2002 to November 2003 at completion of each six-week Ob gyn clerkship rotation, 47 medical students assessed themselves on the following parameters: fund of knowledge, personal attitude, clinical problem-solving skills, written verbal skills, and technical skills. Additionally, they were asked to predict their performance on the NBME Shelf Exam. Their assessments were then compared with their final clerkship grades in each of the above parameters. Chi-squared and Kendall-tau tests were used to analyse the data for degree of agreement and association, respectively. There was a statistically significant weak to moderate, positive correlation between students' self-assessment and final clerkship grade for written verbal skills (p = 0.002, r = 0.390). A statistically significant agreement between raters was also revealed for written verbal skills (p = 0.003). Weak, non-statistically significant, positive relationships were revealed for fund of knowledge, clinical problem-solving and technical skills. A weak, negative, non-significant relationship was revealed for personal attitudes, and there was no statistically significant relationship between students' prediction of NBME score and categorized true score (p = 0.717, r = 0.49). At the end of their Ob gyn clerkship, third-year medical students are better at assessing their technical and written verbal skills than their global fund of knowledge and personal attitudes. These results may suggest that students are not aware of their own personal attitudes and communication skills and how they can affect their effectiveness as a physician.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16147799</pmid><doi>10.1080/01421590500046999</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-159X
ispartof Medical teacher, 2005-08, Vol.27 (5), p.445-449
issn 0142-159X
1466-187X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57086116
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Academic achievement
Clinical Clerkship
Clinical Competence
Communication Skills
Correlation
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Educational Measurement
Grading
Gynecology - education
Humans
Language Skills
Medical schools
Medical Students
Obstetrics - education
Pennsylvania
Problem Solving
Schools, Medical
Self evaluation
Self-Assessment
Self-Evaluation Programs
Selfassessment
Statistical analysis
Student attitudes
Students, Medical - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Technical skills
True Scores
title How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T13%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20medical%20student%20self-assessments%20compare%20with%20their%20final%20clerkship%20grades?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Weiss,%20Patrice%20M.&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=445-449&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft.coden=MEDTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01421590500046999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68562261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233248514&rft_id=info:pmid/16147799&rfr_iscdi=true