Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders
Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Legal and criminological psychology 2003-09, Vol.8 (2), p.207-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Legal and criminological psychology |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Falshaw, Louise Bates, Andrew Patel, Vaneeta Corbett, Carmen Friendship, Caroline |
description | Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction.
Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data.
Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3.
Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1348/135532503322362979 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57066297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57066297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3619-b5674360aaa0c84ed3bb5406c23b3f6592ea43878f03dba7a04bd8262dc213193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpC3DKiRMB2-vYybEUWhARVIiKo-U4DrLIT7Hb0r49joK4cOG02p35RtpB6JzgKwIsvSaQJEATDEApcJqJ7AiNKGYsTgHgGI16Qxwc2SmaeG8LTAmkQRMjtJp6b8KtfY-c0V27s3pju_YybF1VmbbsFdWWvWpLu7O-iWwbqcirZl2bqKui1WPkzX6r6mggjPNn6KRStTeTnzlGq_nd6-w-zp8XD7NpHmvgJIuLhAsGHCulsE6ZKaEoEoa5plBAxZOMGsUgFWmFoSyUUJgVZUo5LXX4gGQwRhdD7tp1n1vjN7KxXpu6Vq3ptl4mAvO-kGCkg1G7zntnKrl2tlHuIAmWfYnyb4kB4gP0ZWtz-Ach89nLMuvBeACt35j9L6jch-QCRCLfnhZymRM6v7kVIecbOdaCVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57066297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Falshaw, Louise ; Bates, Andrew ; Patel, Vaneeta ; Corbett, Carmen ; Friendship, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Falshaw, Louise ; Bates, Andrew ; Patel, Vaneeta ; Corbett, Carmen ; Friendship, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction.
Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data.
Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3.
Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-3259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/135532503322362979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Criminal offences ; Evaluative research ; Measurement ; Outcomes ; Recidivism ; Reconvictions ; Sex offenders ; Sexual behaviour ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Legal and criminological psychology, 2003-09, Vol.8 (2), p.207-215</ispartof><rights>2003 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3619-b5674360aaa0c84ed3bb5406c23b3f6592ea43878f03dba7a04bd8262dc213193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F135532503322362979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F135532503322362979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,31002,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falshaw, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vaneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friendship, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</title><title>Legal and criminological psychology</title><description>Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction.
Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data.
Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3.
Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.</description><subject>Criminal offences</subject><subject>Evaluative research</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Reconvictions</subject><subject>Sex offenders</subject><subject>Sexual behaviour</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>1355-3259</issn><issn>2044-8333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpC3DKiRMB2-vYybEUWhARVIiKo-U4DrLIT7Hb0r49joK4cOG02p35RtpB6JzgKwIsvSaQJEATDEApcJqJ7AiNKGYsTgHgGI16Qxwc2SmaeG8LTAmkQRMjtJp6b8KtfY-c0V27s3pju_YybF1VmbbsFdWWvWpLu7O-iWwbqcirZl2bqKui1WPkzX6r6mggjPNn6KRStTeTnzlGq_nd6-w-zp8XD7NpHmvgJIuLhAsGHCulsE6ZKaEoEoa5plBAxZOMGsUgFWmFoSyUUJgVZUo5LXX4gGQwRhdD7tp1n1vjN7KxXpu6Vq3ptl4mAvO-kGCkg1G7zntnKrl2tlHuIAmWfYnyb4kB4gP0ZWtz-Ach89nLMuvBeACt35j9L6jch-QCRCLfnhZymRM6v7kVIecbOdaCVA</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Falshaw, Louise</creator><creator>Bates, Andrew</creator><creator>Patel, Vaneeta</creator><creator>Corbett, Carmen</creator><creator>Friendship, Caroline</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</title><author>Falshaw, Louise ; Bates, Andrew ; Patel, Vaneeta ; Corbett, Carmen ; Friendship, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3619-b5674360aaa0c84ed3bb5406c23b3f6592ea43878f03dba7a04bd8262dc213193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Criminal offences</topic><topic>Evaluative research</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Reconvictions</topic><topic>Sex offenders</topic><topic>Sexual behaviour</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falshaw, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vaneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friendship, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Legal and criminological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falshaw, Louise</au><au>Bates, Andrew</au><au>Patel, Vaneeta</au><au>Corbett, Carmen</au><au>Friendship, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</atitle><jtitle>Legal and criminological psychology</jtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>207-215</pages><issn>1355-3259</issn><eissn>2044-8333</eissn><abstract>Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction.
Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data.
Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3.
Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1348/135532503322362979</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-3259 |
ispartof | Legal and criminological psychology, 2003-09, Vol.8 (2), p.207-215 |
issn | 1355-3259 2044-8333 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57066297 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Criminal offences Evaluative research Measurement Outcomes Recidivism Reconvictions Sex offenders Sexual behaviour Treatment |
title | Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T12%3A19%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20reconviction,%20reoffending%20and%20recidivism%20in%20a%20sample%20of%20UK%20sexual%20offenders&rft.jtitle=Legal%20and%20criminological%20psychology&rft.au=Falshaw,%20Louise&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=207-215&rft.issn=1355-3259&rft.eissn=2044-8333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/135532503322362979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57066297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57066297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |