Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders

Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Legal and criminological psychology 2003-09, Vol.8 (2), p.207-215
Hauptverfasser: Falshaw, Louise, Bates, Andrew, Patel, Vaneeta, Corbett, Carmen, Friendship, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue 2
container_start_page 207
container_title Legal and criminological psychology
container_volume 8
creator Falshaw, Louise
Bates, Andrew
Patel, Vaneeta
Corbett, Carmen
Friendship, Caroline
description Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction. Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data. Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3. Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.
doi_str_mv 10.1348/135532503322362979
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57066297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57066297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3619-b5674360aaa0c84ed3bb5406c23b3f6592ea43878f03dba7a04bd8262dc213193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpC3DKiRMB2-vYybEUWhARVIiKo-U4DrLIT7Hb0r49joK4cOG02p35RtpB6JzgKwIsvSaQJEATDEApcJqJ7AiNKGYsTgHgGI16Qxwc2SmaeG8LTAmkQRMjtJp6b8KtfY-c0V27s3pju_YybF1VmbbsFdWWvWpLu7O-iWwbqcirZl2bqKui1WPkzX6r6mggjPNn6KRStTeTnzlGq_nd6-w-zp8XD7NpHmvgJIuLhAsGHCulsE6ZKaEoEoa5plBAxZOMGsUgFWmFoSyUUJgVZUo5LXX4gGQwRhdD7tp1n1vjN7KxXpu6Vq3ptl4mAvO-kGCkg1G7zntnKrl2tlHuIAmWfYnyb4kB4gP0ZWtz-Ach89nLMuvBeACt35j9L6jch-QCRCLfnhZymRM6v7kVIecbOdaCVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57066297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Falshaw, Louise ; Bates, Andrew ; Patel, Vaneeta ; Corbett, Carmen ; Friendship, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Falshaw, Louise ; Bates, Andrew ; Patel, Vaneeta ; Corbett, Carmen ; Friendship, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction. Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data. Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3. Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-3259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/135532503322362979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Criminal offences ; Evaluative research ; Measurement ; Outcomes ; Recidivism ; Reconvictions ; Sex offenders ; Sexual behaviour ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Legal and criminological psychology, 2003-09, Vol.8 (2), p.207-215</ispartof><rights>2003 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3619-b5674360aaa0c84ed3bb5406c23b3f6592ea43878f03dba7a04bd8262dc213193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F135532503322362979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F135532503322362979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,31002,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falshaw, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vaneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friendship, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</title><title>Legal and criminological psychology</title><description>Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction. Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data. Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3. Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.</description><subject>Criminal offences</subject><subject>Evaluative research</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Reconvictions</subject><subject>Sex offenders</subject><subject>Sexual behaviour</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>1355-3259</issn><issn>2044-8333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpC3DKiRMB2-vYybEUWhARVIiKo-U4DrLIT7Hb0r49joK4cOG02p35RtpB6JzgKwIsvSaQJEATDEApcJqJ7AiNKGYsTgHgGI16Qxwc2SmaeG8LTAmkQRMjtJp6b8KtfY-c0V27s3pju_YybF1VmbbsFdWWvWpLu7O-iWwbqcirZl2bqKui1WPkzX6r6mggjPNn6KRStTeTnzlGq_nd6-w-zp8XD7NpHmvgJIuLhAsGHCulsE6ZKaEoEoa5plBAxZOMGsUgFWmFoSyUUJgVZUo5LXX4gGQwRhdD7tp1n1vjN7KxXpu6Vq3ptl4mAvO-kGCkg1G7zntnKrl2tlHuIAmWfYnyb4kB4gP0ZWtz-Ach89nLMuvBeACt35j9L6jch-QCRCLfnhZymRM6v7kVIecbOdaCVA</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Falshaw, Louise</creator><creator>Bates, Andrew</creator><creator>Patel, Vaneeta</creator><creator>Corbett, Carmen</creator><creator>Friendship, Caroline</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</title><author>Falshaw, Louise ; Bates, Andrew ; Patel, Vaneeta ; Corbett, Carmen ; Friendship, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3619-b5674360aaa0c84ed3bb5406c23b3f6592ea43878f03dba7a04bd8262dc213193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Criminal offences</topic><topic>Evaluative research</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Reconvictions</topic><topic>Sex offenders</topic><topic>Sexual behaviour</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falshaw, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Vaneeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friendship, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Legal and criminological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falshaw, Louise</au><au>Bates, Andrew</au><au>Patel, Vaneeta</au><au>Corbett, Carmen</au><au>Friendship, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders</atitle><jtitle>Legal and criminological psychology</jtitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>207-215</pages><issn>1355-3259</issn><eissn>2044-8333</eissn><abstract>Purpose. The rate of sexual reconviction for sexual offenders is known to be low. Sexual reconviction, however, is currently the most commonly used outcome measure in sex offender treatment evaluation studies. It is expected that sex offender treatment programmes will reduce the likelihood of reconviction amongst participants. A low base rate of sexual reconviction means that any reduction in reconviction (which could be attributed to treatment) will be small and unlikely to be statistically significant. This study aimed to assess other offence‐related outcomes for sexual offenders, in addition to reconviction. Methods. The sample comprised 173 sexual offenders who had completed a community sex offender treatment programme. Follow‐up information was collected forthe sample from programme files containing multi‐agency information. Official reconviction rates were also calculated using both Home Office and police data. Results. Collecting evidence of any offence‐related sexual behaviour during this study multiplied the sample's sexual reconviction rate by a factor of 5.3. Conclusions. The results show that broadening the outcome measure under observation indicates a higher level of offence‐related sexual behaviour displayed by sexual offenders than reflected by reconviction data. These results have implications for the outcomes measured in treatment evaluation research for sexual offenders.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1348/135532503322362979</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-3259
ispartof Legal and criminological psychology, 2003-09, Vol.8 (2), p.207-215
issn 1355-3259
2044-8333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57066297
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Criminal offences
Evaluative research
Measurement
Outcomes
Recidivism
Reconvictions
Sex offenders
Sexual behaviour
Treatment
title Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T12%3A19%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20reconviction,%20reoffending%20and%20recidivism%20in%20a%20sample%20of%20UK%20sexual%20offenders&rft.jtitle=Legal%20and%20criminological%20psychology&rft.au=Falshaw,%20Louise&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=207-215&rft.issn=1355-3259&rft.eissn=2044-8333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/135532503322362979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57066297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57066297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true