Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples
Confirmatory factor analysis of Australian adaptations of combined Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) scores was conducted in a sample of 277 participants undergoing investigation for neurological disorders. The best-fitting model was a six-f...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Intelligence (Norwood) 2004-01, Vol.32 (4), p.363-389 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 389 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 363 |
| container_title | Intelligence (Norwood) |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Bowden, Stephen C. Cook, Mark J. Bardenhagen, Fiona J. Shores, E.Arthur Carstairs, Jane R. |
| description | Confirmatory factor analysis of Australian adaptations of combined Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) scores was conducted in a sample of 277 participants undergoing investigation for neurological disorders. The best-fitting model was a six-factor model representing the latent abilities of Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, Working Memory, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Processing Speed. Invariance of the measurement model was then examined in the mean and covariance structure with data from a recent Australian normative study of the WAIS-R and WMS-R. [Carstairs J.R. & Shores E.A.
Aust Psychol 35 (2000) 36-40]. Results suggest that the measurement model underlying test scores displayed “strong” metric invariance [Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.),
The science of prevention: Methodological advance from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association] across clinical and community samples. These findings satisfy assumptions necessary for uncomplicated interpretation of validity correlations and differences in test scores across groups. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.intell.2004.05.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57050910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ729979</ericid><els_id>S0160289604000388</els_id><sourcerecordid>57050910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-5223d5607d10203b867670044369d8c7f19485eb16ba1242ebad32a29412d99a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1EJZaFN-ghQoJbwtiJ7fiChKrSFhX1AmfLcSaLV0m82MlKfXum3RVIHLjYlub7R-NvGLvkUHHg6uO-CvOC41gJgKYCWQGIF2zDW12X2tTyJdsQBqVojXrFXue8BwDJm3bDhm_o8ppwwnkpwnx0KbjZYxGHwseEdOzmsIQjFq4LI70wE1b8xAVT3OGMcc3FjGuKY9wF78bCzT2lpmml3GOR3XQYMb9hF4MbM74931v248v196vb8v7h5u7q833pG14vpRSi7qUC3XMQUHet0krTn5pamb71euCmaSV2XHWOi0Zg5_paOGEaLnpjXL1lH059Dyn-WjEvdgrZkxr3PKmVGiQYDgS--wfcxzXNNJsV0AgJquYENSfIp5hzwsEeUphcerQc7JN5u7cn8_bJvAVpyTzF3p97u0xGhkRGQ_6bVdBqbSRxlycOU_B_ytdftTCG1rZln85lEnYMmGz2AWk5fUjoF9vH8P85fgMZJ6TN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204250631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bowden, Stephen C. ; Cook, Mark J. ; Bardenhagen, Fiona J. ; Shores, E.Arthur ; Carstairs, Jane R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Stephen C. ; Cook, Mark J. ; Bardenhagen, Fiona J. ; Shores, E.Arthur ; Carstairs, Jane R.</creatorcontrib><description>Confirmatory factor analysis of Australian adaptations of combined Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) scores was conducted in a sample of 277 participants undergoing investigation for neurological disorders. The best-fitting model was a six-factor model representing the latent abilities of Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, Working Memory, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Processing Speed. Invariance of the measurement model was then examined in the mean and covariance structure with data from a recent Australian normative study of the WAIS-R and WMS-R. [Carstairs J.R. & Shores E.A.
Aust Psychol 35 (2000) 36-40]. Results suggest that the measurement model underlying test scores displayed “strong” metric invariance [Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.),
The science of prevention: Methodological advance from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association] across clinical and community samples. These findings satisfy assumptions necessary for uncomplicated interpretation of validity correlations and differences in test scores across groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2004.05.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Orlando, FL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive abilities ; Cognitive Ability ; Community ; Core cognitive ability ; Correlation ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; Intelligence ; Intelligence tests ; Measures (Individuals) ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Methodology ; Neurological disorders ; Neurological Impairments ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Scores ; Techniques and methods ; Validity ; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale ; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised ; Wechsler Memory Scale ; Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 2004-01, Vol.32 (4), p.363-389</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ablex Publishing Corporation 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-5223d5607d10203b867670044369d8c7f19485eb16ba1242ebad32a29412d99a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.05.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,30998,30999,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ729979$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16087795$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardenhagen, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shores, E.Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Jane R.</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>Confirmatory factor analysis of Australian adaptations of combined Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) scores was conducted in a sample of 277 participants undergoing investigation for neurological disorders. The best-fitting model was a six-factor model representing the latent abilities of Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, Working Memory, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Processing Speed. Invariance of the measurement model was then examined in the mean and covariance structure with data from a recent Australian normative study of the WAIS-R and WMS-R. [Carstairs J.R. & Shores E.A.
Aust Psychol 35 (2000) 36-40]. Results suggest that the measurement model underlying test scores displayed “strong” metric invariance [Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.),
The science of prevention: Methodological advance from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association] across clinical and community samples. These findings satisfy assumptions necessary for uncomplicated interpretation of validity correlations and differences in test scores across groups.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive abilities</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Core cognitive ability</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Neurological disorders</subject><subject>Neurological Impairments</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale</subject><subject>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised</subject><subject>Wechsler Memory Scale</subject><subject>Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1EJZaFN-ghQoJbwtiJ7fiChKrSFhX1AmfLcSaLV0m82MlKfXum3RVIHLjYlub7R-NvGLvkUHHg6uO-CvOC41gJgKYCWQGIF2zDW12X2tTyJdsQBqVojXrFXue8BwDJm3bDhm_o8ppwwnkpwnx0KbjZYxGHwseEdOzmsIQjFq4LI70wE1b8xAVT3OGMcc3FjGuKY9wF78bCzT2lpmml3GOR3XQYMb9hF4MbM74931v248v196vb8v7h5u7q833pG14vpRSi7qUC3XMQUHet0krTn5pamb71euCmaSV2XHWOi0Zg5_paOGEaLnpjXL1lH059Dyn-WjEvdgrZkxr3PKmVGiQYDgS--wfcxzXNNJsV0AgJquYENSfIp5hzwsEeUphcerQc7JN5u7cn8_bJvAVpyTzF3p97u0xGhkRGQ_6bVdBqbSRxlycOU_B_ytdftTCG1rZln85lEnYMmGz2AWk5fUjoF9vH8P85fgMZJ6TN</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Bowden, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Cook, Mark J.</creator><creator>Bardenhagen, Fiona J.</creator><creator>Shores, E.Arthur</creator><creator>Carstairs, Jane R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples</title><author>Bowden, Stephen C. ; Cook, Mark J. ; Bardenhagen, Fiona J. ; Shores, E.Arthur ; Carstairs, Jane R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-5223d5607d10203b867670044369d8c7f19485eb16ba1242ebad32a29412d99a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive abilities</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Core cognitive ability</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Neurological disorders</topic><topic>Neurological Impairments</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale</topic><topic>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised</topic><topic>Wechsler Memory Scale</topic><topic>Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardenhagen, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shores, E.Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Jane R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowden, Stephen C.</au><au>Cook, Mark J.</au><au>Bardenhagen, Fiona J.</au><au>Shores, E.Arthur</au><au>Carstairs, Jane R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ729979</ericid><atitle>Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>363-389</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>Confirmatory factor analysis of Australian adaptations of combined Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) scores was conducted in a sample of 277 participants undergoing investigation for neurological disorders. The best-fitting model was a six-factor model representing the latent abilities of Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, Working Memory, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Processing Speed. Invariance of the measurement model was then examined in the mean and covariance structure with data from a recent Australian normative study of the WAIS-R and WMS-R. [Carstairs J.R. & Shores E.A.
Aust Psychol 35 (2000) 36-40]. Results suggest that the measurement model underlying test scores displayed “strong” metric invariance [Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant & M. Windle (Eds.),
The science of prevention: Methodological advance from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association] across clinical and community samples. These findings satisfy assumptions necessary for uncomplicated interpretation of validity correlations and differences in test scores across groups.</abstract><cop>Orlando, FL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.intell.2004.05.002</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0160-2896 |
| ispartof | Intelligence (Norwood), 2004-01, Vol.32 (4), p.363-389 |
| issn | 0160-2896 1873-7935 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57050910 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Australia Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Cognitive abilities Cognitive Ability Community Core cognitive ability Correlation Factor Analysis Foreign Countries Intelligence Intelligence tests Measures (Individuals) Medical sciences Memory Methodology Neurological disorders Neurological Impairments Psychological tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Scores Techniques and methods Validity Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Wechsler Memory Scale Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised |
| title | Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20invariance%20of%20core%20cognitive%20abilities%20in%20heterogeneous%20neurological%20and%20community%20samples&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Bowden,%20Stephen%20C.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=363-389&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.intell.2004.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57050910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204250631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ729979&rft_els_id=S0160289604000388&rfr_iscdi=true |