Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs
In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Topics in early childhood special education 2004-07, Vol.24 (2), p.59-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Topics in early childhood special education |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Danaher, Joan Harbin, Gloria Shackelford, Jo |
description | In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57045215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57045215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_570452153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzLtOw0AQheEtQEq4vMNU6SJ2jS0_ACKijuijYT12Bo13NjtrBG-Pi9BTHf3Sp3Pjtr7pwz40od24O7NP733o23brvo_0xcaV0wQo-YwQdc5Y2DSBjkDCE3-wcP2BrMKRyWDUApxGTPWp6jAIFchFp4KzAaZhDbJ4VhWwTJFRgIYlYuX18w8-uNsRxejxuvdud3h9f3nbr-CykNXTzBZJBBPpYqeu923XhO753_AX4WVSBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57045215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Danaher, Joan ; Harbin, Gloria ; Shackelford, Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Danaher, Joan ; Harbin, Gloria ; Shackelford, Jo</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-1214</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Early intervention programmes ; Eligibility ; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990 ; Policy ; Special needs preschool children ; USA</subject><ispartof>Topics in early childhood special education, 2004-07, Vol.24 (2), p.59-67</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,30979</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danaher, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbin, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</title><title>Topics in early childhood special education</title><description>In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)</description><subject>Early intervention programmes</subject><subject>Eligibility</subject><subject>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Special needs preschool children</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0271-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzLtOw0AQheEtQEq4vMNU6SJ2jS0_ACKijuijYT12Bo13NjtrBG-Pi9BTHf3Sp3Pjtr7pwz40od24O7NP733o23brvo_0xcaV0wQo-YwQdc5Y2DSBjkDCE3-wcP2BrMKRyWDUApxGTPWp6jAIFchFp4KzAaZhDbJ4VhWwTJFRgIYlYuX18w8-uNsRxejxuvdud3h9f3nbr-CykNXTzBZJBBPpYqeu923XhO753_AX4WVSBQ</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Danaher, Joan</creator><creator>Harbin, Gloria</creator><creator>Shackelford, Jo</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</title><author>Danaher, Joan ; Harbin, Gloria ; Shackelford, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_570452153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Early intervention programmes</topic><topic>Eligibility</topic><topic>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Special needs preschool children</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danaher, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbin, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Topics in early childhood special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danaher, Joan</au><au>Harbin, Gloria</au><au>Shackelford, Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</atitle><jtitle>Topics in early childhood special education</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>59-67</pages><issn>0271-1214</issn><abstract>In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-1214 |
ispartof | Topics in early childhood special education, 2004-07, Vol.24 (2), p.59-67 |
issn | 0271-1214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57045215 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source |
subjects | Early intervention programmes Eligibility Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990 Policy Special needs preschool children USA |
title | Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20alpha%20comparison%20of%20eligibility%20policies%20for%20infant/toddler%20programs%20and%20preschool%20special%20education%20programs&rft.jtitle=Topics%20in%20early%20childhood%20special%20education&rft.au=Danaher,%20Joan&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=59-67&rft.issn=0271-1214&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57045215%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57045215&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |