Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs

In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Topics in early childhood special education 2004-07, Vol.24 (2), p.59-67
Hauptverfasser: Danaher, Joan, Harbin, Gloria, Shackelford, Jo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 2
container_start_page 59
container_title Topics in early childhood special education
container_volume 24
creator Danaher, Joan
Harbin, Gloria
Shackelford, Jo
description In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57045215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57045215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_570452153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzLtOw0AQheEtQEq4vMNU6SJ2jS0_ACKijuijYT12Bo13NjtrBG-Pi9BTHf3Sp3Pjtr7pwz40od24O7NP733o23brvo_0xcaV0wQo-YwQdc5Y2DSBjkDCE3-wcP2BrMKRyWDUApxGTPWp6jAIFchFp4KzAaZhDbJ4VhWwTJFRgIYlYuX18w8-uNsRxejxuvdud3h9f3nbr-CykNXTzBZJBBPpYqeu923XhO753_AX4WVSBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57045215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Danaher, Joan ; Harbin, Gloria ; Shackelford, Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Danaher, Joan ; Harbin, Gloria ; Shackelford, Jo</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-1214</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Early intervention programmes ; Eligibility ; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990 ; Policy ; Special needs preschool children ; USA</subject><ispartof>Topics in early childhood special education, 2004-07, Vol.24 (2), p.59-67</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,30979</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danaher, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbin, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</title><title>Topics in early childhood special education</title><description>In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)</description><subject>Early intervention programmes</subject><subject>Eligibility</subject><subject>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Special needs preschool children</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0271-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzLtOw0AQheEtQEq4vMNU6SJ2jS0_ACKijuijYT12Bo13NjtrBG-Pi9BTHf3Sp3Pjtr7pwz40od24O7NP733o23brvo_0xcaV0wQo-YwQdc5Y2DSBjkDCE3-wcP2BrMKRyWDUApxGTPWp6jAIFchFp4KzAaZhDbJ4VhWwTJFRgIYlYuX18w8-uNsRxejxuvdud3h9f3nbr-CykNXTzBZJBBPpYqeu923XhO753_AX4WVSBQ</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Danaher, Joan</creator><creator>Harbin, Gloria</creator><creator>Shackelford, Jo</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</title><author>Danaher, Joan ; Harbin, Gloria ; Shackelford, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_570452153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Early intervention programmes</topic><topic>Eligibility</topic><topic>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Special needs preschool children</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danaher, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbin, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackelford, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Topics in early childhood special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danaher, Joan</au><au>Harbin, Gloria</au><au>Shackelford, Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs</atitle><jtitle>Topics in early childhood special education</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>59-67</pages><issn>0271-1214</issn><abstract>In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA. (Original abstract)</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-1214
ispartof Topics in early childhood special education, 2004-07, Vol.24 (2), p.59-67
issn 0271-1214
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57045215
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source
subjects Early intervention programmes
Eligibility
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1990
Policy
Special needs preschool children
USA
title Revisiting alpha comparison of eligibility policies for infant/toddler programs and preschool special education programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20alpha%20comparison%20of%20eligibility%20policies%20for%20infant/toddler%20programs%20and%20preschool%20special%20education%20programs&rft.jtitle=Topics%20in%20early%20childhood%20special%20education&rft.au=Danaher,%20Joan&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=59-67&rft.issn=0271-1214&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57045215%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57045215&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true