Socio-demographic predictors of self-rated health in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the National Survey on Lifestyle, Attitudes andNutrition, SLAN
Though Ireland continues to have a poor health profile compared with other European Union countries, previous research on social variationshas been limited. For the first time in the Republic of Ireland, the influence on self-rated health of various socio-demographic indicatorswas assessed in a mult...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2003-08, Vol.57 (3), p.477-486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Though Ireland continues to have a poor health profile compared with other European Union countries, previous research on social variationshas been limited. For the first time in the Republic of Ireland, the influence on self-rated health of various socio-demographic indicatorswas assessed in a multi-variate logistic regression model, separatelyfor men and women. Data were from the first National Survey of Lifestyles, Attitudes and Nutrition, SLAN, conducted by post in a multi-stage, cluster random sample across 26 counties. There were 6539 respondents (45.4% males). Mean self-rated health differed significantly according to age, marital status, tenure, educational status, social class, household size and eligibility for general medical services (GMS), butnot according to gender or rurality. There were also differences if residing in a district with low level of affluence, or according to social cluster groupings. There were numerous significant correlations between the nine socio-demographic measures, but the most consistent pattern was between GMS eligibility and the various indicators, for both men and women. In the case of men, whether social class was included in the multi-variate model or not, education status remained predictivein the final model, (OR 2.36 CI 1.35-4.12) as did smoking status (OR 2.11 CI 1.47-3.02). Odds ratio for GMS eligibility was 3.33 (CI 2.61-4.26) attenuated to 1.70 (CI 1.12-2.56) in the final model. For women the pattern was somewhat different. Only GMS status (OR 2.64 CI 1.74-3.99) and level of education (2.25 CI 1.19-4.24) were predictive in the final model. A multi-level analysis showed that area level of affluence was not significantly predictive of self-rated health when individual level factors were taken into account. (Original abstract) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-9536 |