Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization
Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Yale journal on regulation 2002-07, Vol.19 (2), p.413-470 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 413 |
container_title | Yale journal on regulation |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Ngo, Minh Van |
description | Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39198965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>144078651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g895-5fc13724dd4b252e01d4391ad10696ce14f88316f58e61466ea4e753361b96fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdTjtrwzAYFKWFpmn_g-jQzWC9rTGEviCQJbuRpU-pg2O5_uQh_fV1mk4ZjjvujuNuyIILowtluboli9JIVlipzD15QDyUJZPGmAXZrvbQ-xP1CTNS1weav4AGOJ7lGTgNQ3eiKVIEP40Q5rDJf5FDhHyx29z-uNym_pHcRdchPP3zkuzeXnfrj2Kzff9crzbFvrKqUNEzYbgMQTZccShZkMIyF1iprfbAZKwqwXRUFWgmtQYnwSghNGusjiCW5OUyO4zpewLM9bFFD13nekgT1vOYraxWc_H5qnhI09jP12oulJGV4Er8Ah6aV8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235748325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Ngo, Minh Van</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Minh Van</creatorcontrib><description>Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-5925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Haven: Yale Journal on Regulation</publisher><subject>Assets ; Bankruptcy laws ; Bias ; Collateral ; Cost control ; Costs ; Debt ; Debt financing ; Debtors ; Decision making ; Equilibrium ; Insolvency ; Interest rates ; Law ; Popularity ; Risk ; Risk aversion ; Securitization ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Supply & demand ; Supply and demand ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Yale journal on regulation, 2002-07, Vol.19 (2), p.413-470</ispartof><rights>Copyright Yale University School of Law Summer 2002</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Minh Van</creatorcontrib><title>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</title><title>Yale journal on regulation</title><description>Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.</description><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Bankruptcy laws</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Collateral</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Insolvency</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Securitization</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply & demand</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0741-9457</issn><issn>2376-5925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdTjtrwzAYFKWFpmn_g-jQzWC9rTGEviCQJbuRpU-pg2O5_uQh_fV1mk4ZjjvujuNuyIILowtluboli9JIVlipzD15QDyUJZPGmAXZrvbQ-xP1CTNS1weav4AGOJ7lGTgNQ3eiKVIEP40Q5rDJf5FDhHyx29z-uNym_pHcRdchPP3zkuzeXnfrj2Kzff9crzbFvrKqUNEzYbgMQTZccShZkMIyF1iprfbAZKwqwXRUFWgmtQYnwSghNGusjiCW5OUyO4zpewLM9bFFD13nekgT1vOYraxWc_H5qnhI09jP12oulJGV4Er8Ah6aV8E</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Ngo, Minh Van</creator><general>Yale Journal on Regulation</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</title><author>Ngo, Minh Van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g895-5fc13724dd4b252e01d4391ad10696ce14f88316f58e61466ea4e753361b96fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Bankruptcy laws</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Collateral</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Insolvency</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Securitization</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply & demand</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Minh Van</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Yale journal on regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngo, Minh Van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</atitle><jtitle>Yale journal on regulation</jtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>413-470</pages><issn>0741-9457</issn><eissn>2376-5925</eissn><abstract>Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.</abstract><cop>New Haven</cop><pub>Yale Journal on Regulation</pub><tpages>58</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-9457 |
ispartof | Yale journal on regulation, 2002-07, Vol.19 (2), p.413-470 |
issn | 0741-9457 2376-5925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39198965 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Assets Bankruptcy laws Bias Collateral Cost control Costs Debt Debt financing Debtors Decision making Equilibrium Insolvency Interest rates Law Popularity Risk Risk aversion Securitization Stockholders Studies Supply & demand Supply and demand Theory |
title | Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agency%20costs%20and%20the%20demand%20and%20supply%20of%20secured%20debt%20and%20asset%20securitization&rft.jtitle=Yale%20journal%20on%20regulation&rft.au=Ngo,%20Minh%20Van&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=413-470&rft.issn=0741-9457&rft.eissn=2376-5925&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E144078651%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235748325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |