Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization

Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Yale journal on regulation 2002-07, Vol.19 (2), p.413-470
1. Verfasser: Ngo, Minh Van
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 470
container_issue 2
container_start_page 413
container_title Yale journal on regulation
container_volume 19
creator Ngo, Minh Van
description Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39198965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>144078651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g895-5fc13724dd4b252e01d4391ad10696ce14f88316f58e61466ea4e753361b96fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdTjtrwzAYFKWFpmn_g-jQzWC9rTGEviCQJbuRpU-pg2O5_uQh_fV1mk4ZjjvujuNuyIILowtluboli9JIVlipzD15QDyUJZPGmAXZrvbQ-xP1CTNS1weav4AGOJ7lGTgNQ3eiKVIEP40Q5rDJf5FDhHyx29z-uNym_pHcRdchPP3zkuzeXnfrj2Kzff9crzbFvrKqUNEzYbgMQTZccShZkMIyF1iprfbAZKwqwXRUFWgmtQYnwSghNGusjiCW5OUyO4zpewLM9bFFD13nekgT1vOYraxWc_H5qnhI09jP12oulJGV4Er8Ah6aV8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235748325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Ngo, Minh Van</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Minh Van</creatorcontrib><description>Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-5925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Haven: Yale Journal on Regulation</publisher><subject>Assets ; Bankruptcy laws ; Bias ; Collateral ; Cost control ; Costs ; Debt ; Debt financing ; Debtors ; Decision making ; Equilibrium ; Insolvency ; Interest rates ; Law ; Popularity ; Risk ; Risk aversion ; Securitization ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Supply &amp; demand ; Supply and demand ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Yale journal on regulation, 2002-07, Vol.19 (2), p.413-470</ispartof><rights>Copyright Yale University School of Law Summer 2002</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Minh Van</creatorcontrib><title>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</title><title>Yale journal on regulation</title><description>Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.</description><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Bankruptcy laws</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Collateral</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Insolvency</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Securitization</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply &amp; demand</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0741-9457</issn><issn>2376-5925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdTjtrwzAYFKWFpmn_g-jQzWC9rTGEviCQJbuRpU-pg2O5_uQh_fV1mk4ZjjvujuNuyIILowtluboli9JIVlipzD15QDyUJZPGmAXZrvbQ-xP1CTNS1weav4AGOJ7lGTgNQ3eiKVIEP40Q5rDJf5FDhHyx29z-uNym_pHcRdchPP3zkuzeXnfrj2Kzff9crzbFvrKqUNEzYbgMQTZccShZkMIyF1iprfbAZKwqwXRUFWgmtQYnwSghNGusjiCW5OUyO4zpewLM9bFFD13nekgT1vOYraxWc_H5qnhI09jP12oulJGV4Er8Ah6aV8E</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Ngo, Minh Van</creator><general>Yale Journal on Regulation</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</title><author>Ngo, Minh Van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g895-5fc13724dd4b252e01d4391ad10696ce14f88316f58e61466ea4e753361b96fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Bankruptcy laws</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Collateral</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Insolvency</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Securitization</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply &amp; demand</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Minh Van</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Yale journal on regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngo, Minh Van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization</atitle><jtitle>Yale journal on regulation</jtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>413-470</pages><issn>0741-9457</issn><eissn>2376-5925</eissn><abstract>Current accounts of the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization are in stark contrast with observed debtor behavior. This Article addresses the disconnects between current theories and observed practices by considering the effects of the agency costs associated with corporations and the risk-aversion associated with non-corporate forms of business enterprises on the demand for secured debt. Integrating agency costs and risk-aversion into the debtor decision between secured and unsecured debt suggests a strong bias against secured debt because free assets serve as a safety mechanism for managers similar to Jensen's theory with respect to free cash flow. An analysis of the supply of secured debt and asset securitization illustrates that a significant, if not primary, element of both species of financing is the radically different way in which secured debt and asset securitization attempt to decrease the likelihood of debtor insolvency.</abstract><cop>New Haven</cop><pub>Yale Journal on Regulation</pub><tpages>58</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-9457
ispartof Yale journal on regulation, 2002-07, Vol.19 (2), p.413-470
issn 0741-9457
2376-5925
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39198965
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Assets
Bankruptcy laws
Bias
Collateral
Cost control
Costs
Debt
Debt financing
Debtors
Decision making
Equilibrium
Insolvency
Interest rates
Law
Popularity
Risk
Risk aversion
Securitization
Stockholders
Studies
Supply & demand
Supply and demand
Theory
title Agency costs and the demand and supply of secured debt and asset securitization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agency%20costs%20and%20the%20demand%20and%20supply%20of%20secured%20debt%20and%20asset%20securitization&rft.jtitle=Yale%20journal%20on%20regulation&rft.au=Ngo,%20Minh%20Van&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=413-470&rft.issn=0741-9457&rft.eissn=2376-5925&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E144078651%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235748325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true