Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector
This paper outlines a methodological framework for the economic evaluation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission abatement policies and measures, formulating a basis for the selection of those options of climate change mitigation interventions that minimize economic cost and maximize social welfare. To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental planning and management 2002-03, Vol.45 (2), p.181-198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Journal of environmental planning and management |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Sarafidis, Y. Mirasgedis, S. Georgopoulou, E. Lalas, D. P. |
description | This paper outlines a methodological framework for the economic evaluation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission abatement policies and measures, formulating a basis for the selection of those options of climate change mitigation interventions that minimize economic cost and maximize social welfare. To this purpose, a cost-benefit analysis has been implemented in order to evaluate a variety of CO 2 emission abatement measures in the Greek energy sector on the basis of their social (i.e. the sum of the private and external) costs and benefits, and it is compared with a cost-effectiveness analysis, which takes into account only the net financial costs of the examined interventions. The analysis clearly reveals that a significant decrease in CO 2 emissions is possible without great cost to the economy. Moreover, the monetization of environmental benefits (e.g. the restriction of impacts on human health, agriculture and biodiversity, etc.) associated with the above-mentioned interventions represents a powerful tool for highlighting priority actions in the context of a climate change mitigation policy and for quantifying their overall economic and environmental effectiveness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09640560220116297 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_repec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39022665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19921203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-20764a49fb6051686d85b40f065eeca647c6125ed1b8f92265a79bc04d5a91313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMFu1DAUtBBILIUP4OYTt4VnJ3ZiiUu1hAIq4gDckCzHeW5dEjvY3tL9e7xaxKUSPYzfSG9m9DyEvGTwmkEPb0DJFoQEzoExyVX3iGxYI2ELQqjHZHPcVy77p-RZzjcAIBomN-THYGOIi7d0uDXz3hQfA42O7kwaK3vn452fkA6Lz_m4Oh9NwQVDoZ_R5H3CTH2g5RrpRUL8SYeA6epAv6ItMT0nT5yZM774O8_I9_fDt92H7eWXi4-788utbZkqWw6dbE2r3ChBMNnLqRdjCw6kQLRGtp2VjAuc2Ng7xbkUplOjhXYSRrGGNWfk1Sl3TfHXHnPR9VyL82wCxn3Wjaq9SCkeFDKlOOPQVCE7CW2KOSd0ek1-MemgGehj4fpe4dXz6eRJuKL9ZyjG3WBYlyt9qxvTivocKjgAr8MfacVawXpWL-j1dVlq2NtTmA8upsX8jmmeatZhjsklE6yv3_rfLd2D9nsuXe5K8wcBbbA6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19921203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Sarafidis, Y. ; Mirasgedis, S. ; Georgopoulou, E. ; Lalas, D. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarafidis, Y. ; Mirasgedis, S. ; Georgopoulou, E. ; Lalas, D. P.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper outlines a methodological framework for the economic evaluation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission abatement policies and measures, formulating a basis for the selection of those options of climate change mitigation interventions that minimize economic cost and maximize social welfare. To this purpose, a cost-benefit analysis has been implemented in order to evaluate a variety of CO 2 emission abatement measures in the Greek energy sector on the basis of their social (i.e. the sum of the private and external) costs and benefits, and it is compared with a cost-effectiveness analysis, which takes into account only the net financial costs of the examined interventions. The analysis clearly reveals that a significant decrease in CO 2 emissions is possible without great cost to the economy. Moreover, the monetization of environmental benefits (e.g. the restriction of impacts on human health, agriculture and biodiversity, etc.) associated with the above-mentioned interventions represents a powerful tool for highlighting priority actions in the context of a climate change mitigation policy and for quantifying their overall economic and environmental effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09640560220116297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Energy industry ; Environment ; Greece ; Management ; Planning methods ; Pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental planning and management, 2002-03, Vol.45 (2), p.181-198</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-20764a49fb6051686d85b40f065eeca647c6125ed1b8f92265a79bc04d5a91313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-20764a49fb6051686d85b40f065eeca647c6125ed1b8f92265a79bc04d5a91313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09640560220116297$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640560220116297$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4008,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tafjenpmg/v_3a45_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a181-198.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarafidis, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirasgedis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgopoulou, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalas, D. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector</title><title>Journal of environmental planning and management</title><description>This paper outlines a methodological framework for the economic evaluation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission abatement policies and measures, formulating a basis for the selection of those options of climate change mitigation interventions that minimize economic cost and maximize social welfare. To this purpose, a cost-benefit analysis has been implemented in order to evaluate a variety of CO 2 emission abatement measures in the Greek energy sector on the basis of their social (i.e. the sum of the private and external) costs and benefits, and it is compared with a cost-effectiveness analysis, which takes into account only the net financial costs of the examined interventions. The analysis clearly reveals that a significant decrease in CO 2 emissions is possible without great cost to the economy. Moreover, the monetization of environmental benefits (e.g. the restriction of impacts on human health, agriculture and biodiversity, etc.) associated with the above-mentioned interventions represents a powerful tool for highlighting priority actions in the context of a climate change mitigation policy and for quantifying their overall economic and environmental effectiveness.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Greece</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Planning methods</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><issn>0964-0568</issn><issn>1360-0559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMFu1DAUtBBILIUP4OYTt4VnJ3ZiiUu1hAIq4gDckCzHeW5dEjvY3tL9e7xaxKUSPYzfSG9m9DyEvGTwmkEPb0DJFoQEzoExyVX3iGxYI2ELQqjHZHPcVy77p-RZzjcAIBomN-THYGOIi7d0uDXz3hQfA42O7kwaK3vn452fkA6Lz_m4Oh9NwQVDoZ_R5H3CTH2g5RrpRUL8SYeA6epAv6ItMT0nT5yZM774O8_I9_fDt92H7eWXi4-788utbZkqWw6dbE2r3ChBMNnLqRdjCw6kQLRGtp2VjAuc2Ng7xbkUplOjhXYSRrGGNWfk1Sl3TfHXHnPR9VyL82wCxn3Wjaq9SCkeFDKlOOPQVCE7CW2KOSd0ek1-MemgGehj4fpe4dXz6eRJuKL9ZyjG3WBYlyt9qxvTivocKjgAr8MfacVawXpWL-j1dVlq2NtTmA8upsX8jmmeatZhjsklE6yv3_rfLd2D9nsuXe5K8wcBbbA6</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Sarafidis, Y.</creator><creator>Mirasgedis, S.</creator><creator>Georgopoulou, E.</creator><creator>Lalas, D. P.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector</title><author>Sarafidis, Y. ; Mirasgedis, S. ; Georgopoulou, E. ; Lalas, D. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-20764a49fb6051686d85b40f065eeca647c6125ed1b8f92265a79bc04d5a91313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Greece</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Planning methods</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarafidis, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirasgedis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgopoulou, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalas, D. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental planning and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarafidis, Y.</au><au>Mirasgedis, S.</au><au>Georgopoulou, E.</au><au>Lalas, D. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental planning and management</jtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>181-198</pages><issn>0964-0568</issn><eissn>1360-0559</eissn><abstract>This paper outlines a methodological framework for the economic evaluation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission abatement policies and measures, formulating a basis for the selection of those options of climate change mitigation interventions that minimize economic cost and maximize social welfare. To this purpose, a cost-benefit analysis has been implemented in order to evaluate a variety of CO 2 emission abatement measures in the Greek energy sector on the basis of their social (i.e. the sum of the private and external) costs and benefits, and it is compared with a cost-effectiveness analysis, which takes into account only the net financial costs of the examined interventions. The analysis clearly reveals that a significant decrease in CO 2 emissions is possible without great cost to the economy. Moreover, the monetization of environmental benefits (e.g. the restriction of impacts on human health, agriculture and biodiversity, etc.) associated with the above-mentioned interventions represents a powerful tool for highlighting priority actions in the context of a climate change mitigation policy and for quantifying their overall economic and environmental effectiveness.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09640560220116297</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-0568 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental planning and management, 2002-03, Vol.45 (2), p.181-198 |
issn | 0964-0568 1360-0559 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_39022665 |
source | RePEc; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Climate change Energy industry Environment Greece Management Planning methods Pollution |
title | Economic Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement Measures in the Greek Energy Sector |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_repec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20Evaluation%20of%20Carbon%20Dioxide%20Emission%20Abatement%20Measures%20in%20the%20Greek%20Energy%20Sector&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20planning%20and%20management&rft.au=Sarafidis,%20Y.&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=181-198&rft.issn=0964-0568&rft.eissn=1360-0559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09640560220116297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_repec%3E19921203%3C/proquest_repec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19921203&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |