Concepts in Social and Spatial Marginality

The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual taxonomy of marginality resulting from two counterposed structural conditions within laissez-faire on the one hand and controlled markets on the other. Marginality is a complex condition of disadvantage that individuals and communities may experie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography Human geography, 2000-01, Vol.82 (2), p.89-101
Hauptverfasser: Mehretu, Assefa, Bruce Wm. Pigozzi, Sommers, Lawrence M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 2
container_start_page 89
container_title Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography
container_volume 82
creator Mehretu, Assefa
Bruce Wm. Pigozzi
Sommers, Lawrence M.
description The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual taxonomy of marginality resulting from two counterposed structural conditions within laissez-faire on the one hand and controlled markets on the other. Marginality is a complex condition of disadvantage that individuals and communities may experience because of vulnerabilities which may arise from unequal or inequitable environmental, ethnic, cultural, social, political and economic factors. A typology of marginality is based on two primary and two derivative forms. The primary forms are contingent and systemic. The derivative forms are collateral and leveraged. Contingent marginality is a condition that results from competitive inequality in which individuals and communities are put at a disadvantage because of the dynamics of the free market whose uncertain and stochastic outcomes affect them adversely. Systemic marginality is a socioeconomic condition of disadvantage created by socially constructed inequitable non-market forces of bias. Collateral marginality is a condition experienced by individuals or communities who are marginalized solely on the basis of their social and/or geographic proximity to individuals or communities that experience either contingent or systemic marginality. Lever-aged marginality is a contingent or systemic disadvantage that people/communities are made to experience when their bargaining position in free markets is weakened by dominant stakeholders like transnational corporations which are able to leverage lucrative concessions by using the threat of alternative, often cheaper and marginalized (contingent or systemic) labour pools to which they can potentially take their business.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1468-0467.00076
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38967111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>491067</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>491067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1651-7808738bc4a86e3e59659bdde243c36debfa1dfecbf23f890ffd23cf7cabe6163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMoWFfPHrwUBA9Cd5MmnaRHWfyCFQ-r55CmibR0m5q0h_33pq7swWFghuF5h5kXoWuClyTGijAQGWbAlxhjDicoOU5OUYIZLTIKgp2jixDaiOCcQ4Lu167XZhhD2vTp1ulGdanq63Q7qHHu35T_anrVNeP-Ep1Z1QVz9VcX6PPp8WP9km3en1_XD5tMEyhIxgUWnIpKMyXAUFOUUJRVXZucUU2hNpVVpLZGVzanVpTY2jqn2nKtKgME6ALdHfYO3n1PJoxy1wRtuk71xk1BUlECjx9H8PYf2LrJx2ODJLyMCTzHkVodKO1dCN5YOfhmp_xeEixn5-Tsk5x9kr_ORcXNQdGG0fkjzkqCgdMfKmhoQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791796720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concepts in Social and Spatial Marginality</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Mehretu, Assefa ; Bruce Wm. Pigozzi ; Sommers, Lawrence M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehretu, Assefa ; Bruce Wm. Pigozzi ; Sommers, Lawrence M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual taxonomy of marginality resulting from two counterposed structural conditions within laissez-faire on the one hand and controlled markets on the other. Marginality is a complex condition of disadvantage that individuals and communities may experience because of vulnerabilities which may arise from unequal or inequitable environmental, ethnic, cultural, social, political and economic factors. A typology of marginality is based on two primary and two derivative forms. The primary forms are contingent and systemic. The derivative forms are collateral and leveraged. Contingent marginality is a condition that results from competitive inequality in which individuals and communities are put at a disadvantage because of the dynamics of the free market whose uncertain and stochastic outcomes affect them adversely. Systemic marginality is a socioeconomic condition of disadvantage created by socially constructed inequitable non-market forces of bias. Collateral marginality is a condition experienced by individuals or communities who are marginalized solely on the basis of their social and/or geographic proximity to individuals or communities that experience either contingent or systemic marginality. Lever-aged marginality is a contingent or systemic disadvantage that people/communities are made to experience when their bargaining position in free markets is weakened by dominant stakeholders like transnational corporations which are able to leverage lucrative concessions by using the threat of alternative, often cheaper and marginalized (contingent or systemic) labour pools to which they can potentially take their business.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0435-3684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1468-0467.00076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stockholm: Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography</publisher><subject>Communities ; Developing countries ; Free market economies ; Free markets ; Geography ; Ghettos ; Inequality ; Laissez-faire ; Marginality ; Marginalization ; Multinational enterprises ; Planned economies ; Social construction ; Social disadvantage ; Space ; Urban poverty ; Urban studies</subject><ispartof>Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography, 2000-01, Vol.82 (2), p.89-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1651-7808738bc4a86e3e59659bdde243c36debfa1dfecbf23f890ffd23cf7cabe6163</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/491067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/491067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehretu, Assefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce Wm. Pigozzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers, Lawrence M.</creatorcontrib><title>Concepts in Social and Spatial Marginality</title><title>Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography</title><description>The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual taxonomy of marginality resulting from two counterposed structural conditions within laissez-faire on the one hand and controlled markets on the other. Marginality is a complex condition of disadvantage that individuals and communities may experience because of vulnerabilities which may arise from unequal or inequitable environmental, ethnic, cultural, social, political and economic factors. A typology of marginality is based on two primary and two derivative forms. The primary forms are contingent and systemic. The derivative forms are collateral and leveraged. Contingent marginality is a condition that results from competitive inequality in which individuals and communities are put at a disadvantage because of the dynamics of the free market whose uncertain and stochastic outcomes affect them adversely. Systemic marginality is a socioeconomic condition of disadvantage created by socially constructed inequitable non-market forces of bias. Collateral marginality is a condition experienced by individuals or communities who are marginalized solely on the basis of their social and/or geographic proximity to individuals or communities that experience either contingent or systemic marginality. Lever-aged marginality is a contingent or systemic disadvantage that people/communities are made to experience when their bargaining position in free markets is weakened by dominant stakeholders like transnational corporations which are able to leverage lucrative concessions by using the threat of alternative, often cheaper and marginalized (contingent or systemic) labour pools to which they can potentially take their business.</description><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Free market economies</subject><subject>Free markets</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Ghettos</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Laissez-faire</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Marginalization</subject><subject>Multinational enterprises</subject><subject>Planned economies</subject><subject>Social construction</subject><subject>Social disadvantage</subject><subject>Space</subject><subject>Urban poverty</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><issn>0435-3684</issn><issn>1468-0467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMoWFfPHrwUBA9Cd5MmnaRHWfyCFQ-r55CmibR0m5q0h_33pq7swWFghuF5h5kXoWuClyTGijAQGWbAlxhjDicoOU5OUYIZLTIKgp2jixDaiOCcQ4Lu167XZhhD2vTp1ulGdanq63Q7qHHu35T_anrVNeP-Ep1Z1QVz9VcX6PPp8WP9km3en1_XD5tMEyhIxgUWnIpKMyXAUFOUUJRVXZucUU2hNpVVpLZGVzanVpTY2jqn2nKtKgME6ALdHfYO3n1PJoxy1wRtuk71xk1BUlECjx9H8PYf2LrJx2ODJLyMCTzHkVodKO1dCN5YOfhmp_xeEixn5-Tsk5x9kr_ORcXNQdGG0fkjzkqCgdMfKmhoQA</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Mehretu, Assefa</creator><creator>Bruce Wm. Pigozzi</creator><creator>Sommers, Lawrence M.</creator><general>Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography</general><general>Svenska sällskapet för anthropologi och geografi, distributed by the Almquist &amp; Wicksell Publishing Co</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Concepts in Social and Spatial Marginality</title><author>Mehretu, Assefa ; Bruce Wm. Pigozzi ; Sommers, Lawrence M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1651-7808738bc4a86e3e59659bdde243c36debfa1dfecbf23f890ffd23cf7cabe6163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Free market economies</topic><topic>Free markets</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Ghettos</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Laissez-faire</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Marginalization</topic><topic>Multinational enterprises</topic><topic>Planned economies</topic><topic>Social construction</topic><topic>Social disadvantage</topic><topic>Space</topic><topic>Urban poverty</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehretu, Assefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce Wm. Pigozzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers, Lawrence M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehretu, Assefa</au><au>Bruce Wm. Pigozzi</au><au>Sommers, Lawrence M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concepts in Social and Spatial Marginality</atitle><jtitle>Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>89-101</pages><issn>0435-3684</issn><eissn>1468-0467</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual taxonomy of marginality resulting from two counterposed structural conditions within laissez-faire on the one hand and controlled markets on the other. Marginality is a complex condition of disadvantage that individuals and communities may experience because of vulnerabilities which may arise from unequal or inequitable environmental, ethnic, cultural, social, political and economic factors. A typology of marginality is based on two primary and two derivative forms. The primary forms are contingent and systemic. The derivative forms are collateral and leveraged. Contingent marginality is a condition that results from competitive inequality in which individuals and communities are put at a disadvantage because of the dynamics of the free market whose uncertain and stochastic outcomes affect them adversely. Systemic marginality is a socioeconomic condition of disadvantage created by socially constructed inequitable non-market forces of bias. Collateral marginality is a condition experienced by individuals or communities who are marginalized solely on the basis of their social and/or geographic proximity to individuals or communities that experience either contingent or systemic marginality. Lever-aged marginality is a contingent or systemic disadvantage that people/communities are made to experience when their bargaining position in free markets is weakened by dominant stakeholders like transnational corporations which are able to leverage lucrative concessions by using the threat of alternative, often cheaper and marginalized (contingent or systemic) labour pools to which they can potentially take their business.</abstract><cop>Stockholm</cop><pub>Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography</pub><doi>10.1111/1468-0467.00076</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0435-3684
ispartof Geografiska annaler. Series B, Human geography, 2000-01, Vol.82 (2), p.89-101
issn 0435-3684
1468-0467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38967111
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Communities
Developing countries
Free market economies
Free markets
Geography
Ghettos
Inequality
Laissez-faire
Marginality
Marginalization
Multinational enterprises
Planned economies
Social construction
Social disadvantage
Space
Urban poverty
Urban studies
title Concepts in Social and Spatial Marginality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concepts%20in%20Social%20and%20Spatial%20Marginality&rft.jtitle=Geografiska%20annaler.%20Series%20B,%20Human%20geography&rft.au=Mehretu,%20Assefa&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=89-101&rft.issn=0435-3684&rft.eissn=1468-0467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1468-0467.00076&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E491067%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791796720&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=491067&rfr_iscdi=true