Why Choose One Level of Analysis? and Other Issues in Multilevel Research
Several issues related to multilevel research and measurement theory are discussed. It was emphasized that questions regarding choice of level of measurement and unit of analysis are less important than the choice of an appropriate statistical model. It was demonstrated that even with an "error...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environment and behavior 1996-03, Vol.28 (2), p.237-255 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Environment and behavior |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Levine, Douglas W. |
description | Several issues related to multilevel research and measurement theory are discussed. It was emphasized that questions regarding choice of level of measurement and unit of analysis are less important than the choice of an appropriate statistical model. It was demonstrated that even with an "error-free" environmental measure not all persons should view the setting in the same manner. The split-sample correlation was clearly shown to have undesirable statistical properties, and the use of standard methods was stressed. Investigators were cautioned to carefully choose a coefficient and were shown that this choice is sometimes tricky. Finally, the analysis of multilevel data using multilevel methods was recommended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0013916596282005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38962307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0013916596282005</sage_id><sourcerecordid>308414988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6eb2b73ecd042727414ec1bc37f3e82ec4bad44839984c696b9819da5db10f313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1LwzAUAPAgCs7p3WPw4K2azyY5iQw_BpOBKHorafpqO7p2Jquw_97UCcJAdgrh_d4H7yF0TskVpUpdE0K5oak0KdOMEHmARlRKlnBD3g_RaAgnQ_wYnYSwIPGvtRyh6Vu1wZOq6wLgeQt4Bl_Q4K7Et61tNqEON9i2BZ6vK_B4GkIPAdctfuqbdd382GcIYL2rTtFRaZsAZ7_vGL3e371MHpPZ_GE6uZ0ljhuzTlLIWa44uIIIppgSVICjueOq5KAZOJHbQggdsRYuNWluNDWFlUVOSckpH6PLbd2V7z7jOOtsWQcHTWNb6PqQcR1XwInaD2MTSanZCxnRRAsytL7YgYuu93FRgyFaaSnSiMgWOd-F4KHMVr5eWr_JKMmGU2W7p4opyTYl2A_4q_mv_wb5RpCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200878546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Choose One Level of Analysis? and Other Issues in Multilevel Research</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Levine, Douglas W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas W.</creatorcontrib><description>Several issues related to multilevel research and measurement theory are discussed. It was emphasized that questions regarding choice of level of measurement and unit of analysis are less important than the choice of an appropriate statistical model. It was demonstrated that even with an "error-free" environmental measure not all persons should view the setting in the same manner. The split-sample correlation was clearly shown to have undesirable statistical properties, and the use of standard methods was stressed. Investigators were cautioned to carefully choose a coefficient and were shown that this choice is sometimes tricky. Finally, the analysis of multilevel data using multilevel methods was recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0013916596282005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVBHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Coefficients ; Correlation ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Methodology ; Multilevel ; Statistical analysis ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Environment and behavior, 1996-03, Vol.28 (2), p.237-255</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6eb2b73ecd042727414ec1bc37f3e82ec4bad44839984c696b9819da5db10f313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6eb2b73ecd042727414ec1bc37f3e82ec4bad44839984c696b9819da5db10f313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0013916596282005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916596282005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas W.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Choose One Level of Analysis? and Other Issues in Multilevel Research</title><title>Environment and behavior</title><description>Several issues related to multilevel research and measurement theory are discussed. It was emphasized that questions regarding choice of level of measurement and unit of analysis are less important than the choice of an appropriate statistical model. It was demonstrated that even with an "error-free" environmental measure not all persons should view the setting in the same manner. The split-sample correlation was clearly shown to have undesirable statistical properties, and the use of standard methods was stressed. Investigators were cautioned to carefully choose a coefficient and were shown that this choice is sometimes tricky. Finally, the analysis of multilevel data using multilevel methods was recommended.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Multilevel</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0013-9165</issn><issn>1552-390X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1LwzAUAPAgCs7p3WPw4K2azyY5iQw_BpOBKHorafpqO7p2Jquw_97UCcJAdgrh_d4H7yF0TskVpUpdE0K5oak0KdOMEHmARlRKlnBD3g_RaAgnQ_wYnYSwIPGvtRyh6Vu1wZOq6wLgeQt4Bl_Q4K7Et61tNqEON9i2BZ6vK_B4GkIPAdctfuqbdd382GcIYL2rTtFRaZsAZ7_vGL3e371MHpPZ_GE6uZ0ljhuzTlLIWa44uIIIppgSVICjueOq5KAZOJHbQggdsRYuNWluNDWFlUVOSckpH6PLbd2V7z7jOOtsWQcHTWNb6PqQcR1XwInaD2MTSanZCxnRRAsytL7YgYuu93FRgyFaaSnSiMgWOd-F4KHMVr5eWr_JKMmGU2W7p4opyTYl2A_4q_mv_wb5RpCA</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>Levine, Douglas W.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Why Choose One Level of Analysis? and Other Issues in Multilevel Research</title><author>Levine, Douglas W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6eb2b73ecd042727414ec1bc37f3e82ec4bad44839984c696b9819da5db10f313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Multilevel</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levine, Douglas W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levine, Douglas W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Choose One Level of Analysis? and Other Issues in Multilevel Research</atitle><jtitle>Environment and behavior</jtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>255</epage><pages>237-255</pages><issn>0013-9165</issn><eissn>1552-390X</eissn><coden>EVBHAF</coden><abstract>Several issues related to multilevel research and measurement theory are discussed. It was emphasized that questions regarding choice of level of measurement and unit of analysis are less important than the choice of an appropriate statistical model. It was demonstrated that even with an "error-free" environmental measure not all persons should view the setting in the same manner. The split-sample correlation was clearly shown to have undesirable statistical properties, and the use of standard methods was stressed. Investigators were cautioned to carefully choose a coefficient and were shown that this choice is sometimes tricky. Finally, the analysis of multilevel data using multilevel methods was recommended.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0013916596282005</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-9165 |
ispartof | Environment and behavior, 1996-03, Vol.28 (2), p.237-255 |
issn | 0013-9165 1552-390X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38962307 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Analysis Coefficients Correlation Mathematical models Measurement Methodology Multilevel Statistical analysis Theory |
title | Why Choose One Level of Analysis? and Other Issues in Multilevel Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A03%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Choose%20One%20Level%20of%20Analysis?%20and%20Other%20Issues%20in%20Multilevel%20Research&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Levine,%20Douglas%20W.&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=255&rft.pages=237-255&rft.issn=0013-9165&rft.eissn=1552-390X&rft.coden=EVBHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0013916596282005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E308414988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200878546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0013916596282005&rfr_iscdi=true |