Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination

In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental social psychology 2000-11, Vol.36 (6), p.649-659
Hauptverfasser: Lassiter, G.Daniel, Geers, Andrew L., Apple, Kevin J., Beers, Melissa J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 659
container_issue 6
container_start_page 649
container_title Journal of experimental social psychology
container_volume 36
creator Lassiter, G.Daniel
Geers, Andrew L.
Apple, Kevin J.
Beers, Melissa J.
description In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jesp.2000.1428
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38946814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022103100914288</els_id><sourcerecordid>38946814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgCs7p1XNR8Nb55KVpIniYolMQBNFzyNKnmNG1M-mG-unNNhERPIWE3_OSPyHHFEYUQJ7PMC5GDCBdBVM7ZEBByxyELHbJAICxnAKn--QgxllSGhgdkMvHacSwsr3vWttkk842MbNtlV3hq135LmQvre_95wZcZOPsCfHdzn27eTgke3UqwKPvc0hebm-er-_yh8fJ_fX4IXcCoM-VpJrJEqeICNyJUqsCgDKtRFVVU2BgNZVFWQLXorZFLWopeV0yWygtBOdDcrbtuwjd2xJjb-Y-Omwa22K3jIYnJhUVCZ78gbNuGdLPomE0zU17lAmd_oeoVFxLqjgkNdoqF7oYA9ZmEfzchg9DwawDN-vAzTpwsw78V1sbnW3qYFvn409VqbUUMim1VZjyWnkMJjqPrcPKB3S9qTr_34Av2rKQJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683961830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lassiter, G.Daniel ; Geers, Andrew L. ; Apple, Kevin J. ; Beers, Melissa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lassiter, G.Daniel ; Geers, Andrew L. ; Apple, Kevin J. ; Beers, Melissa J.</creatorcontrib><description>In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1428</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Actors ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human behaviour ; Learning ; Objectives ; Observation ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2000-11, Vol.36 (6), p.649-659</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Nov 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1428$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=799646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lassiter, G.Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geers, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apple, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Melissa J.</creatorcontrib><title>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.</description><subject>Actors</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgCs7p1XNR8Nb55KVpIniYolMQBNFzyNKnmNG1M-mG-unNNhERPIWE3_OSPyHHFEYUQJ7PMC5GDCBdBVM7ZEBByxyELHbJAICxnAKn--QgxllSGhgdkMvHacSwsr3vWttkk842MbNtlV3hq135LmQvre_95wZcZOPsCfHdzn27eTgke3UqwKPvc0hebm-er-_yh8fJ_fX4IXcCoM-VpJrJEqeICNyJUqsCgDKtRFVVU2BgNZVFWQLXorZFLWopeV0yWygtBOdDcrbtuwjd2xJjb-Y-Omwa22K3jIYnJhUVCZ78gbNuGdLPomE0zU17lAmd_oeoVFxLqjgkNdoqF7oYA9ZmEfzchg9DwawDN-vAzTpwsw78V1sbnW3qYFvn409VqbUUMim1VZjyWnkMJjqPrcPKB3S9qTr_34Av2rKQJw</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Lassiter, G.Daniel</creator><creator>Geers, Andrew L.</creator><creator>Apple, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Beers, Melissa J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</title><author>Lassiter, G.Daniel ; Geers, Andrew L. ; Apple, Kevin J. ; Beers, Melissa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Actors</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lassiter, G.Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geers, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apple, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Melissa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lassiter, G.Daniel</au><au>Geers, Andrew L.</au><au>Apple, Kevin J.</au><au>Beers, Melissa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>649-659</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1006/jesp.2000.1428</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1031
ispartof Journal of experimental social psychology, 2000-11, Vol.36 (6), p.649-659
issn 0022-1031
1096-0465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38946814
source Periodicals Index Online; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Actors
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human behaviour
Learning
Objectives
Observation
Perceptions
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social psychology
title Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Observational%20Goals%20and%20Behavior%20Unitization:%20A%20Reexamination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Lassiter,%20G.Daniel&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=649-659&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jesp.2000.1428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38946814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683961830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022103100914288&rfr_iscdi=true