Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination
In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental social psychology 2000-11, Vol.36 (6), p.649-659 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 659 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Journal of experimental social psychology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Lassiter, G.Daniel Geers, Andrew L. Apple, Kevin J. Beers, Melissa J. |
description | In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/jesp.2000.1428 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38946814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022103100914288</els_id><sourcerecordid>38946814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgCs7p1XNR8Nb55KVpIniYolMQBNFzyNKnmNG1M-mG-unNNhERPIWE3_OSPyHHFEYUQJ7PMC5GDCBdBVM7ZEBByxyELHbJAICxnAKn--QgxllSGhgdkMvHacSwsr3vWttkk842MbNtlV3hq135LmQvre_95wZcZOPsCfHdzn27eTgke3UqwKPvc0hebm-er-_yh8fJ_fX4IXcCoM-VpJrJEqeICNyJUqsCgDKtRFVVU2BgNZVFWQLXorZFLWopeV0yWygtBOdDcrbtuwjd2xJjb-Y-Omwa22K3jIYnJhUVCZ78gbNuGdLPomE0zU17lAmd_oeoVFxLqjgkNdoqF7oYA9ZmEfzchg9DwawDN-vAzTpwsw78V1sbnW3qYFvn409VqbUUMim1VZjyWnkMJjqPrcPKB3S9qTr_34Av2rKQJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683961830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lassiter, G.Daniel ; Geers, Andrew L. ; Apple, Kevin J. ; Beers, Melissa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lassiter, G.Daniel ; Geers, Andrew L. ; Apple, Kevin J. ; Beers, Melissa J.</creatorcontrib><description>In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1428</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Actors ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human behaviour ; Learning ; Objectives ; Observation ; Perceptions ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2000-11, Vol.36 (6), p.649-659</ispartof><rights>2000 Academic Press</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Nov 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1428$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=799646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lassiter, G.Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geers, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apple, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Melissa J.</creatorcontrib><title>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.</description><subject>Actors</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgCs7p1XNR8Nb55KVpIniYolMQBNFzyNKnmNG1M-mG-unNNhERPIWE3_OSPyHHFEYUQJ7PMC5GDCBdBVM7ZEBByxyELHbJAICxnAKn--QgxllSGhgdkMvHacSwsr3vWttkk842MbNtlV3hq135LmQvre_95wZcZOPsCfHdzn27eTgke3UqwKPvc0hebm-er-_yh8fJ_fX4IXcCoM-VpJrJEqeICNyJUqsCgDKtRFVVU2BgNZVFWQLXorZFLWopeV0yWygtBOdDcrbtuwjd2xJjb-Y-Omwa22K3jIYnJhUVCZ78gbNuGdLPomE0zU17lAmd_oeoVFxLqjgkNdoqF7oYA9ZmEfzchg9DwawDN-vAzTpwsw78V1sbnW3qYFvn409VqbUUMim1VZjyWnkMJjqPrcPKB3S9qTr_34Av2rKQJw</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Lassiter, G.Daniel</creator><creator>Geers, Andrew L.</creator><creator>Apple, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Beers, Melissa J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</title><author>Lassiter, G.Daniel ; Geers, Andrew L. ; Apple, Kevin J. ; Beers, Melissa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-8619267ebeee03c479850012984dddb020a9165770394fa5f4f663f72a5894433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Actors</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lassiter, G.Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geers, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apple, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Melissa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lassiter, G.Daniel</au><au>Geers, Andrew L.</au><au>Apple, Kevin J.</au><au>Beers, Melissa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>649-659</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>In two studies, we found that perceivers with different observational goals—learning an actor's task, forming an impression of her, or no specific goal—picked up qualitatively different information while viewing the actor's ongoing behavior. Because we used a between-subjects design and analysis, our results rule out a demand-characteristics interpretation that may explain a similar finding in earlier research. We also found that the explicit goal of learning a task or forming an impression (relative to having no specific goal) led to the selection of less information overall from the observed behavior. Finally, in contrast to previous work on this topic, we found that the goal of learning a task did not lead perceivers to select more information than did the goal of forming an impression. Implications of these findings and future research possibilities are discussed.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1006/jesp.2000.1428</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1031 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental social psychology, 2000-11, Vol.36 (6), p.649-659 |
issn | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38946814 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Actors Behavior Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human behaviour Learning Objectives Observation Perceptions Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology |
title | Observational Goals and Behavior Unitization: A Reexamination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Observational%20Goals%20and%20Behavior%20Unitization:%20A%20Reexamination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Lassiter,%20G.Daniel&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=649-659&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jesp.2000.1428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38946814%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683961830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022103100914288&rfr_iscdi=true |