Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework

Observers of organizations recognize now that work related misconduct is both pervasive and costly. There is ample evidence that members of organizations sabotage processes, steal company property, harass others, cheat the government, or mislead customers. Companies and the public pay dearly. What a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organization science (Providence, R.I.) R.I.), 1996-03, Vol.7 (2), p.151-165
Hauptverfasser: Vardi, Yoav, Wiener, Yoash
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Organization science (Providence, R.I.)
container_volume 7
creator Vardi, Yoav
Wiener, Yoash
description Observers of organizations recognize now that work related misconduct is both pervasive and costly. There is ample evidence that members of organizations sabotage processes, steal company property, harass others, cheat the government, or mislead customers. Companies and the public pay dearly. What are the motivational forces that drive organizational members to exhibit such varied forms of misconduct? Are these forces different from those that drive them to engage in constructive behavior? What kinds of personal and organizational factors influence such acts of intentional misbehavior? Our basic objectives in this paper are three-fold; first, to formally define a new construct of Organizational Misbehavior (OMB), and to discuss the theoretical implications of the definition; second, to identify different types of OMB; and third, to develop a conceptual framework that would allow the inclusion of OMB in a comprehensive theory of work motivation, applicable to both proper and improper conduct. We define Organizational Misbehavior as "any intentional action by members of organizations that violates core organizational and/or societal norms." A crucial element in the definition is the intention underlying the misbehavior. It therefore serves as the basis for the distinction among three types or organizational misbehavior: (a) OMB Type S, misbehavior that intends to benefit the self; (b) OMB Type O, misbehavior that intends to benefit the organization; and (c) OMB Type D, misbehavior that intends to inflict damage. In order to integrate these forms of misconduct within a comprehensive motivational framework, we use the distinction between normative and instrumental sources of motivation. We propose that people who engage in OMB Type S are primarily motivated by self-interest consideration (i.e., instrumental processes), whereas those that perpetrate OMB Type O do so mostly because of strong identification with and loyalty to their organization (i.e., normative processes). OMB Type D, however, may he triggered by either instrumental or normative forces, or by both at the same time. The various instrumental and normative factors that influence misbehavior are not only personal; they can also be organizational. On the individual level, we refer to such factors as the stage of moral development and personal need satisfaction At the organization level, we examine the role of such factors as organization culture and cohesiveness. We finally use the instrumental-norma
doi_str_mv 10.1287/orsc.7.2.151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38937778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2634978</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2634978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-b2239081c79ff47f9827ced9c3571ff384313b02d91820b4649fea2856f410d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxSMEEqWwMTJEDCyQ4s_YZqsqCkitusBsOanduiRxsdNW8NeTNqUDS6e70_3und6LomsIehBx9uh8yHush3qQwpOoAylKE0ooPW16QFjCABbn0UUICwAAwVR0onRsQ6bnam2dj20VT_xMVfZH1dZV4Snux2NX2_VuVEU89KrUG-c_L6Mzo4qgr_a1G30Mn98Hr8lo8vI26I-SnEBQJxlCWAAOcyaMIcwIjliupyLHlEFjMCcY4gygqYAcgYykRBitEKepae6nAneju1Z36d3XSodaljbkuihUpd0qyBSSFNFG5BiIucCMMd6At__AhVv5xlyQCGKOAWBbtYcWyr0LwWsjl96Wyn9LCOQ2armNWjKJZBN1g9-0-CLUzh9YlGIidi_v27WtjPNlOCa2dzK3s_nGei3_zpyfhdwewF9UJpWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213830071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Vardi, Yoav ; Wiener, Yoash</creator><creatorcontrib>Vardi, Yoav ; Wiener, Yoash</creatorcontrib><description>Observers of organizations recognize now that work related misconduct is both pervasive and costly. There is ample evidence that members of organizations sabotage processes, steal company property, harass others, cheat the government, or mislead customers. Companies and the public pay dearly. What are the motivational forces that drive organizational members to exhibit such varied forms of misconduct? Are these forces different from those that drive them to engage in constructive behavior? What kinds of personal and organizational factors influence such acts of intentional misbehavior? Our basic objectives in this paper are three-fold; first, to formally define a new construct of Organizational Misbehavior (OMB), and to discuss the theoretical implications of the definition; second, to identify different types of OMB; and third, to develop a conceptual framework that would allow the inclusion of OMB in a comprehensive theory of work motivation, applicable to both proper and improper conduct. We define Organizational Misbehavior as "any intentional action by members of organizations that violates core organizational and/or societal norms." A crucial element in the definition is the intention underlying the misbehavior. It therefore serves as the basis for the distinction among three types or organizational misbehavior: (a) OMB Type S, misbehavior that intends to benefit the self; (b) OMB Type O, misbehavior that intends to benefit the organization; and (c) OMB Type D, misbehavior that intends to inflict damage. In order to integrate these forms of misconduct within a comprehensive motivational framework, we use the distinction between normative and instrumental sources of motivation. We propose that people who engage in OMB Type S are primarily motivated by self-interest consideration (i.e., instrumental processes), whereas those that perpetrate OMB Type O do so mostly because of strong identification with and loyalty to their organization (i.e., normative processes). OMB Type D, however, may he triggered by either instrumental or normative forces, or by both at the same time. The various instrumental and normative factors that influence misbehavior are not only personal; they can also be organizational. On the individual level, we refer to such factors as the stage of moral development and personal need satisfaction At the organization level, we examine the role of such factors as organization culture and cohesiveness. We finally use the instrumental-normative framework to derive a set of formal propositions about the effects of some of these factors on the form and intensity of OMB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-7039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.2.151</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ORSCEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Conceptual frameworks ; Cultural values ; Deviant Behavior ; Government budgets ; Modeling ; Moral development ; Motivation ; Normativity ; Organization ; Organizational Behavior ; Organizations (Social) ; Professional workers ; Psychological attitudes ; Studies ; White Collar Crime</subject><ispartof>Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 1996-03, Vol.7 (2), p.151-165</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar/Apr 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-b2239081c79ff47f9827ced9c3571ff384313b02d91820b4649fea2856f410d93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/epdf/10.1287/orsc.7.2.151$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/orsc.7.2.151$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3678,27903,27904,33754,57995,58228,62592,62594</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vardi, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Yoash</creatorcontrib><title>Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework</title><title>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</title><description>Observers of organizations recognize now that work related misconduct is both pervasive and costly. There is ample evidence that members of organizations sabotage processes, steal company property, harass others, cheat the government, or mislead customers. Companies and the public pay dearly. What are the motivational forces that drive organizational members to exhibit such varied forms of misconduct? Are these forces different from those that drive them to engage in constructive behavior? What kinds of personal and organizational factors influence such acts of intentional misbehavior? Our basic objectives in this paper are three-fold; first, to formally define a new construct of Organizational Misbehavior (OMB), and to discuss the theoretical implications of the definition; second, to identify different types of OMB; and third, to develop a conceptual framework that would allow the inclusion of OMB in a comprehensive theory of work motivation, applicable to both proper and improper conduct. We define Organizational Misbehavior as "any intentional action by members of organizations that violates core organizational and/or societal norms." A crucial element in the definition is the intention underlying the misbehavior. It therefore serves as the basis for the distinction among three types or organizational misbehavior: (a) OMB Type S, misbehavior that intends to benefit the self; (b) OMB Type O, misbehavior that intends to benefit the organization; and (c) OMB Type D, misbehavior that intends to inflict damage. In order to integrate these forms of misconduct within a comprehensive motivational framework, we use the distinction between normative and instrumental sources of motivation. We propose that people who engage in OMB Type S are primarily motivated by self-interest consideration (i.e., instrumental processes), whereas those that perpetrate OMB Type O do so mostly because of strong identification with and loyalty to their organization (i.e., normative processes). OMB Type D, however, may he triggered by either instrumental or normative forces, or by both at the same time. The various instrumental and normative factors that influence misbehavior are not only personal; they can also be organizational. On the individual level, we refer to such factors as the stage of moral development and personal need satisfaction At the organization level, we examine the role of such factors as organization culture and cohesiveness. We finally use the instrumental-normative framework to derive a set of formal propositions about the effects of some of these factors on the form and intensity of OMB.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Conceptual frameworks</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Deviant Behavior</subject><subject>Government budgets</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Moral development</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Organizational Behavior</subject><subject>Organizations (Social)</subject><subject>Professional workers</subject><subject>Psychological attitudes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>White Collar Crime</subject><issn>1047-7039</issn><issn>1526-5455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxSMEEqWwMTJEDCyQ4s_YZqsqCkitusBsOanduiRxsdNW8NeTNqUDS6e70_3und6LomsIehBx9uh8yHush3qQwpOoAylKE0ooPW16QFjCABbn0UUICwAAwVR0onRsQ6bnam2dj20VT_xMVfZH1dZV4Snux2NX2_VuVEU89KrUG-c_L6Mzo4qgr_a1G30Mn98Hr8lo8vI26I-SnEBQJxlCWAAOcyaMIcwIjliupyLHlEFjMCcY4gygqYAcgYykRBitEKepae6nAneju1Z36d3XSodaljbkuihUpd0qyBSSFNFG5BiIucCMMd6At__AhVv5xlyQCGKOAWBbtYcWyr0LwWsjl96Wyn9LCOQ2armNWjKJZBN1g9-0-CLUzh9YlGIidi_v27WtjPNlOCa2dzK3s_nGei3_zpyfhdwewF9UJpWI</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>Vardi, Yoav</creator><creator>Wiener, Yoash</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework</title><author>Vardi, Yoav ; Wiener, Yoash</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-b2239081c79ff47f9827ced9c3571ff384313b02d91820b4649fea2856f410d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Conceptual frameworks</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Deviant Behavior</topic><topic>Government budgets</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Moral development</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Organizational Behavior</topic><topic>Organizations (Social)</topic><topic>Professional workers</topic><topic>Psychological attitudes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>White Collar Crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vardi, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Yoash</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vardi, Yoav</au><au>Wiener, Yoash</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework</atitle><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>151-165</pages><issn>1047-7039</issn><eissn>1526-5455</eissn><coden>ORSCEZ</coden><abstract>Observers of organizations recognize now that work related misconduct is both pervasive and costly. There is ample evidence that members of organizations sabotage processes, steal company property, harass others, cheat the government, or mislead customers. Companies and the public pay dearly. What are the motivational forces that drive organizational members to exhibit such varied forms of misconduct? Are these forces different from those that drive them to engage in constructive behavior? What kinds of personal and organizational factors influence such acts of intentional misbehavior? Our basic objectives in this paper are three-fold; first, to formally define a new construct of Organizational Misbehavior (OMB), and to discuss the theoretical implications of the definition; second, to identify different types of OMB; and third, to develop a conceptual framework that would allow the inclusion of OMB in a comprehensive theory of work motivation, applicable to both proper and improper conduct. We define Organizational Misbehavior as "any intentional action by members of organizations that violates core organizational and/or societal norms." A crucial element in the definition is the intention underlying the misbehavior. It therefore serves as the basis for the distinction among three types or organizational misbehavior: (a) OMB Type S, misbehavior that intends to benefit the self; (b) OMB Type O, misbehavior that intends to benefit the organization; and (c) OMB Type D, misbehavior that intends to inflict damage. In order to integrate these forms of misconduct within a comprehensive motivational framework, we use the distinction between normative and instrumental sources of motivation. We propose that people who engage in OMB Type S are primarily motivated by self-interest consideration (i.e., instrumental processes), whereas those that perpetrate OMB Type O do so mostly because of strong identification with and loyalty to their organization (i.e., normative processes). OMB Type D, however, may he triggered by either instrumental or normative forces, or by both at the same time. The various instrumental and normative factors that influence misbehavior are not only personal; they can also be organizational. On the individual level, we refer to such factors as the stage of moral development and personal need satisfaction At the organization level, we examine the role of such factors as organization culture and cohesiveness. We finally use the instrumental-normative framework to derive a set of formal propositions about the effects of some of these factors on the form and intensity of OMB.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/orsc.7.2.151</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-7039
ispartof Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 1996-03, Vol.7 (2), p.151-165
issn 1047-7039
1526-5455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38937778
source INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source
subjects Business ethics
Conceptual frameworks
Cultural values
Deviant Behavior
Government budgets
Modeling
Moral development
Motivation
Normativity
Organization
Organizational Behavior
Organizations (Social)
Professional workers
Psychological attitudes
Studies
White Collar Crime
title Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A31%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misbehavior%20in%20Organizations:%20A%20Motivational%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Organization%20science%20(Providence,%20R.I.)&rft.au=Vardi,%20Yoav&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=151-165&rft.issn=1047-7039&rft.eissn=1526-5455&rft.coden=ORSCEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/orsc.7.2.151&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2634978%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213830071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2634978&rfr_iscdi=true