"WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?": TALES FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING BATTLE
Mr. Van Tuyn identifies as a significant trend in environmental law the increasing tendency of federal judges to dismiss proenvironment lawsuits for lack of standing. The trend has been facilitated by United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who urged in a 1983 law review article a strict...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental law (Portland, Ore.) Ore.), 2000-12, Vol.30 (1), p.41-49 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 49 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 41 |
| container_title | Environmental law (Portland, Ore.) |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Van Tuyn, Peter |
| description | Mr. Van Tuyn identifies as a significant trend in environmental law the increasing tendency of federal judges to dismiss proenvironment lawsuits for lack of standing. The trend has been facilitated by United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who urged in a 1983 law review article a stricter application of the standing doctrine for environmental plaintiffs and who has applied this strict test in several Supreme Court cases. The private defense bar and Department of Justice have followed suit, Mr. Van Tuyn argues, raising standing as a defense in improbable circumstances without regard to the practical results of their position, including the greatly increased costs of litigating cases in the public interest. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38928715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A62519978</galeid><jstor_id>43266753</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A62519978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g3225-b84a898d2ac285feee50831d6d682c481feb645707869ae518ef9ce97160f653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0Utrg0AQAGAPLTRN-xMKkkPpoYLuug97KTYxUWoUjG3JSTZmFIOJqWug_fc1j0MDoQ17mJ2Zj4FhLpSOrptUQ4jRK-VayoWu64RR1lGmvQ83VAehOg3f1Nj1gtfdz46c596TGtu-M1GHUThue44aR07Qd9tKONzlTvDuRWEwdoIWqpPYDgZeMFJf7Dj2nRvlMhOlhNtD7Crx0In7ruaHI69v-1qOESLajJuCW3yORIo4yQCA6BwbczqnHKUmNzKYUZMwnXFqCSAGh8xKwWIG1TNKcFe5349d19XnBmSTLAuZQlmKFVQbmWBuIc6M_6FhEswMzFvY28NclJAUq6xqapFucWJTRAzLYlv0eALlsIJalNUKsqIt_-baCd6-OSyL9JR_OPItaeCrycVGysSbROfT4FzKR_4f-x1oWpUl5JC0F-yHR_xuzxeyqepkXRdLUX8nJkaUMoLxD3brvXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14537138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?": TALES FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING BATTLE</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Van Tuyn, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Tuyn, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Mr. Van Tuyn identifies as a significant trend in environmental law the increasing tendency of federal judges to dismiss proenvironment lawsuits for lack of standing. The trend has been facilitated by United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who urged in a 1983 law review article a stricter application of the standing doctrine for environmental plaintiffs and who has applied this strict test in several Supreme Court cases. The private defense bar and Department of Justice have followed suit, Mr. Van Tuyn argues, raising standing as a defense in improbable circumstances without regard to the practical results of their position, including the greatly increased costs of litigating cases in the public interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Citizen lawsuits ; Citizen suits (Civil procedure) ; Defendants ; Environmental justice ; Environmental law ; Environmental legislation ; ESSAYS ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Litigation ; Motion for summary judgment ; Plaintiffs ; Protected areas ; Public interest ; Standing (Law) ; Steels ; Supreme Court ; Supreme Court justices ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Environmental law (Portland, Ore.), 2000-12, Vol.30 (1), p.41-49</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 Environmental Law</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Lewis & Clark Northwestern School of Law</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Lewis & Clark Northwestern School of Law</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43266753$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43266753$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Tuyn, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>"WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?": TALES FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING BATTLE</title><title>Environmental law (Portland, Ore.)</title><addtitle>Environmental Law</addtitle><description>Mr. Van Tuyn identifies as a significant trend in environmental law the increasing tendency of federal judges to dismiss proenvironment lawsuits for lack of standing. The trend has been facilitated by United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who urged in a 1983 law review article a stricter application of the standing doctrine for environmental plaintiffs and who has applied this strict test in several Supreme Court cases. The private defense bar and Department of Justice have followed suit, Mr. Van Tuyn argues, raising standing as a defense in improbable circumstances without regard to the practical results of their position, including the greatly increased costs of litigating cases in the public interest.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Citizen lawsuits</subject><subject>Citizen suits (Civil procedure)</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental legislation</subject><subject>ESSAYS</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Motion for summary judgment</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Standing (Law)</subject><subject>Steels</subject><subject>Supreme Court</subject><subject>Supreme Court justices</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0046-2276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0Utrg0AQAGAPLTRN-xMKkkPpoYLuug97KTYxUWoUjG3JSTZmFIOJqWug_fc1j0MDoQ17mJ2Zj4FhLpSOrptUQ4jRK-VayoWu64RR1lGmvQ83VAehOg3f1Nj1gtfdz46c596TGtu-M1GHUThue44aR07Qd9tKONzlTvDuRWEwdoIWqpPYDgZeMFJf7Dj2nRvlMhOlhNtD7Crx0In7ruaHI69v-1qOESLajJuCW3yORIo4yQCA6BwbczqnHKUmNzKYUZMwnXFqCSAGh8xKwWIG1TNKcFe5349d19XnBmSTLAuZQlmKFVQbmWBuIc6M_6FhEswMzFvY28NclJAUq6xqapFucWJTRAzLYlv0eALlsIJalNUKsqIt_-baCd6-OSyL9JR_OPItaeCrycVGysSbROfT4FzKR_4f-x1oWpUl5JC0F-yHR_xuzxeyqepkXRdLUX8nJkaUMoLxD3brvXY</recordid><startdate>20001222</startdate><enddate>20001222</enddate><creator>Van Tuyn, Peter</creator><general>Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College</general><general>Lewis & Clark Northwestern School of Law</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001222</creationdate><title>"WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?": TALES FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING BATTLE</title><author>Van Tuyn, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g3225-b84a898d2ac285feee50831d6d682c481feb645707869ae518ef9ce97160f653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Citizen lawsuits</topic><topic>Citizen suits (Civil procedure)</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental legislation</topic><topic>ESSAYS</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Motion for summary judgment</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Standing (Law)</topic><topic>Steels</topic><topic>Supreme Court</topic><topic>Supreme Court justices</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Tuyn, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Environmental law (Portland, Ore.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Tuyn, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?": TALES FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING BATTLE</atitle><jtitle>Environmental law (Portland, Ore.)</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Law</addtitle><date>2000-12-22</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>41-49</pages><issn>0046-2276</issn><abstract>Mr. Van Tuyn identifies as a significant trend in environmental law the increasing tendency of federal judges to dismiss proenvironment lawsuits for lack of standing. The trend has been facilitated by United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who urged in a 1983 law review article a stricter application of the standing doctrine for environmental plaintiffs and who has applied this strict test in several Supreme Court cases. The private defense bar and Department of Justice have followed suit, Mr. Van Tuyn argues, raising standing as a defense in improbable circumstances without regard to the practical results of their position, including the greatly increased costs of litigating cases in the public interest.</abstract><pub>Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0046-2276 |
| ispartof | Environmental law (Portland, Ore.), 2000-12, Vol.30 (1), p.41-49 |
| issn | 0046-2276 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38928715 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Analysis Citizen lawsuits Citizen suits (Civil procedure) Defendants Environmental justice Environmental law Environmental legislation ESSAYS Laws, regulations and rules Litigation Motion for summary judgment Plaintiffs Protected areas Public interest Standing (Law) Steels Supreme Court Supreme Court justices U.S.A |
| title | "WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?": TALES FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING BATTLE |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A52%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22WHO%20DO%20YOU%20THINK%20YOU%20ARE?%22:%20TALES%20FROM%20THE%20TRENCHES%20OF%20THE%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20STANDING%20BATTLE&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20law%20(Portland,%20Ore.)&rft.au=Van%20Tuyn,%20Peter&rft.date=2000-12-22&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=41-49&rft.issn=0046-2276&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA62519978%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14537138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A62519978&rft_jstor_id=43266753&rfr_iscdi=true |