MINORITY THREAT AND POLICE BRUTALITY: DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS IN U.S. MUNICIPALITIES

The conflict theory of law stipulates that strategies of crime control regulate threats to the interests of dominant groups. Aggregate‐level research on policing has generally supported this proposition, showing that measures of minority threat are related to legal mechanisms of crime control. Polic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminology (Beverly Hills) 2000-05, Vol.38 (2), p.343-368
1. Verfasser: HOLMES, MALCOLM D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 2
container_start_page 343
container_title Criminology (Beverly Hills)
container_volume 38
creator HOLMES, MALCOLM D.
description The conflict theory of law stipulates that strategies of crime control regulate threats to the interests of dominant groups. Aggregate‐level research on policing has generally supported this proposition, showing that measures of minority threat are related to legal mechanisms of crime control. Police brutality (i.e., use of excessive physical force) constitutes an extra‐legal mechanism of control that has yet to be examined in this theoretical framework. This study extends research in the area theoretically and substantively by testing the hypothesis that the greater the number of threatening acts and people, the greater the number of police brutality civil rights criminal complaints filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. The findings show that measures of the presence of threatening people (percent black, percent Hispanic [in the Southwest], and majority/minority income inequality) were related positively to average annual civil rights criminal complaints.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00893.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38905680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17569920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4723-82b6da4ddeb59e4df9197893d82e443c5b748faa9affee328779d424ae3144c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV9r2zAUxUXZoFnX7yA62Js9_bNl9WW4rptoOHbqOB3bi1BsGZIlTWclLP32k0jpw2CM6UVczu8c7uUAcIVRiN37tA4xZ1EgMIlCghAK90uEEkHD4xkYvUpvwAghjANME3YO3lm7diOJGB-B7VSWVS2bb7CZ1HnawLS8hbOqkFkOb-pFkxZOu4a3eZPXDk3LZg6rO5jJB1nAWo4nbs5q6aUCZtV0VqTSM7KEi3AewumilJmc-RiZz9-Dt73eWHP58l-AxV3eZJOgqMYyS4ugZZzQICHLuNOs68wyEoZ1vcCCu6u6hBjGaBstOUt6rYXue2MoSTgXHSNMG4oZa2N6AT6ecp-G3c-DsXu1XdnWbDb60ewOVtFEoChO0D9BzKNYCOLBqz_A9e4wPLojFCEoFm4H4aAPf4Mw425BElNPXZ-odthZO5hePQ2rrR6eFUbKt6rWylenfHXKt6peWlVHZ_58Mv9abczzfziVb4ky6hKCU8LK7s3xNUEPP1TMKY_U13Ks5uXN5P7h-xdV09_yPa6_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220692879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MINORITY THREAT AND POLICE BRUTALITY: DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS IN U.S. MUNICIPALITIES</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</creator><creatorcontrib>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</creatorcontrib><description>The conflict theory of law stipulates that strategies of crime control regulate threats to the interests of dominant groups. Aggregate‐level research on policing has generally supported this proposition, showing that measures of minority threat are related to legal mechanisms of crime control. Police brutality (i.e., use of excessive physical force) constitutes an extra‐legal mechanism of control that has yet to be examined in this theoretical framework. This study extends research in the area theoretically and substantively by testing the hypothesis that the greater the number of threatening acts and people, the greater the number of police brutality civil rights criminal complaints filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. The findings show that measures of the presence of threatening people (percent black, percent Hispanic [in the Southwest], and majority/minority income inequality) were related positively to average annual civil rights criminal complaints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00893.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRNYA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Civil rights ; civil rights violations ; Complaints ; Criminal justice ; Criminology ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Police ; Police brutality ; Policing ; Social control ; U.S.A ; USA</subject><ispartof>Criminology (Beverly Hills), 2000-05, Vol.38 (2), p.343-368</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Criminology May 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4723-82b6da4ddeb59e4df9197893d82e443c5b748faa9affee328779d424ae3144c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4723-82b6da4ddeb59e4df9197893d82e443c5b748faa9affee328779d424ae3144c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-9125.2000.tb00893.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-9125.2000.tb00893.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27344,27869,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</creatorcontrib><title>MINORITY THREAT AND POLICE BRUTALITY: DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS IN U.S. MUNICIPALITIES</title><title>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</title><description>The conflict theory of law stipulates that strategies of crime control regulate threats to the interests of dominant groups. Aggregate‐level research on policing has generally supported this proposition, showing that measures of minority threat are related to legal mechanisms of crime control. Police brutality (i.e., use of excessive physical force) constitutes an extra‐legal mechanism of control that has yet to be examined in this theoretical framework. This study extends research in the area theoretically and substantively by testing the hypothesis that the greater the number of threatening acts and people, the greater the number of police brutality civil rights criminal complaints filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. The findings show that measures of the presence of threatening people (percent black, percent Hispanic [in the Southwest], and majority/minority income inequality) were related positively to average annual civil rights criminal complaints.</description><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>civil rights violations</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police brutality</subject><subject>Policing</subject><subject>Social control</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0011-1384</issn><issn>1745-9125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV9r2zAUxUXZoFnX7yA62Js9_bNl9WW4rptoOHbqOB3bi1BsGZIlTWclLP32k0jpw2CM6UVczu8c7uUAcIVRiN37tA4xZ1EgMIlCghAK90uEEkHD4xkYvUpvwAghjANME3YO3lm7diOJGB-B7VSWVS2bb7CZ1HnawLS8hbOqkFkOb-pFkxZOu4a3eZPXDk3LZg6rO5jJB1nAWo4nbs5q6aUCZtV0VqTSM7KEi3AewumilJmc-RiZz9-Dt73eWHP58l-AxV3eZJOgqMYyS4ugZZzQICHLuNOs68wyEoZ1vcCCu6u6hBjGaBstOUt6rYXue2MoSTgXHSNMG4oZa2N6AT6ecp-G3c-DsXu1XdnWbDb60ewOVtFEoChO0D9BzKNYCOLBqz_A9e4wPLojFCEoFm4H4aAPf4Mw425BElNPXZ-odthZO5hePQ2rrR6eFUbKt6rWylenfHXKt6peWlVHZ_58Mv9abczzfziVb4ky6hKCU8LK7s3xNUEPP1TMKY_U13Ks5uXN5P7h-xdV09_yPa6_</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>American Society of Criminology</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>MINORITY THREAT AND POLICE BRUTALITY: DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS IN U.S. MUNICIPALITIES</title><author>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4723-82b6da4ddeb59e4df9197893d82e443c5b748faa9affee328779d424ae3144c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>civil rights violations</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police brutality</topic><topic>Policing</topic><topic>Social control</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOLMES, MALCOLM D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MINORITY THREAT AND POLICE BRUTALITY: DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS IN U.S. MUNICIPALITIES</atitle><jtitle>Criminology (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>343-368</pages><issn>0011-1384</issn><eissn>1745-9125</eissn><coden>CRNYA8</coden><abstract>The conflict theory of law stipulates that strategies of crime control regulate threats to the interests of dominant groups. Aggregate‐level research on policing has generally supported this proposition, showing that measures of minority threat are related to legal mechanisms of crime control. Police brutality (i.e., use of excessive physical force) constitutes an extra‐legal mechanism of control that has yet to be examined in this theoretical framework. This study extends research in the area theoretically and substantively by testing the hypothesis that the greater the number of threatening acts and people, the greater the number of police brutality civil rights criminal complaints filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. The findings show that measures of the presence of threatening people (percent black, percent Hispanic [in the Southwest], and majority/minority income inequality) were related positively to average annual civil rights criminal complaints.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00893.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-1384
ispartof Criminology (Beverly Hills), 2000-05, Vol.38 (2), p.343-368
issn 0011-1384
1745-9125
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38905680
source Wiley Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Civil rights
civil rights violations
Complaints
Criminal justice
Criminology
Minority & ethnic groups
Police
Police brutality
Policing
Social control
U.S.A
USA
title MINORITY THREAT AND POLICE BRUTALITY: DETERMINANTS OF CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS IN U.S. MUNICIPALITIES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MINORITY%20THREAT%20AND%20POLICE%20BRUTALITY:%20DETERMINANTS%20OF%20CIVIL%20RIGHTS%20CRIMINAL%20COMPLAINTS%20IN%20U.S.%20MUNICIPALITIES&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=HOLMES,%20MALCOLM%20D.&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=343-368&rft.issn=0011-1384&rft.eissn=1745-9125&rft.coden=CRNYA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00893.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17569920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220692879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true