Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims

Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims

Sher's notion of deserved punishment has unacceptable implications. It does not justify punishing some serious wrongdoers, who are unwilling to commit lesser wrongs, more severely than minor offenders. It requires victim-inflicted punishments which repeat the wrongdoings, with the roles reverse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Utilitas 2000-03, Vol.12 (1), p.85-90
1. Verfasser: Ten, C. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Compensation
Discussions
George Sher
Moral philosophy
Offenders
Political thought
Punishment
Victims
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Utilitas
container_volume 12
creator Ten, C. L.
description Sher's notion of deserved punishment has unacceptable implications. It does not justify punishing some serious wrongdoers, who are unwilling to commit lesser wrongs, more severely than minor offenders. It requires victim-inflicted punishments which repeat the wrongdoings, with the roles reversed. But if Sher moves away from such victim-inflicted punishments, then his theory should treat wrongdoers like tort-feasors who have to pay monetary compensations to their victims.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0953820800002636
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38885953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0953820800002636</cupid><sourcerecordid>38885953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-c89732ba0bb52c9bb1a3db72ff3f99f583d68de2256fe5898877273ae867c5883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANxy4oIC_qntzZGWUpAqAQJ6tZxkDS5NUuwEwduTqhUXJPayh_lmRzuEnDJ6wSjTl080kwI4BdoPV0LtkQHTI5YqBmKfDDZyutEPyVGMS0qZHAEbkPNrjBg-sUweutrHtwrrNrF1mYyxRufbmLRNsvBF66t4TA6cXUU82e0hebmZPk9u0_n97G5yNU8LzmWbFpBpwXNL81zyIstzZkWZa-6ccFnmJIhSQYk9qxxKyAC05lpYBKULCSCG5Gx7dx2ajw5jayofC1ytbI1NF40AANn_04NsCxahiTGgM-vgKxu-DaNmU4v5U0vvSbceH1v8-jXY8G6UFloaNXs0fEEB5mNtRj0vdhm2yoMvX9Esmy7UfQH_pPwANy1xjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38885953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Ten, C. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ten, C. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Sher's notion of deserved punishment has unacceptable implications. It does not justify punishing some serious wrongdoers, who are unwilling to commit lesser wrongs, more severely than minor offenders. It requires victim-inflicted punishments which repeat the wrongdoings, with the roles reversed. But if Sher moves away from such victim-inflicted punishments, then his theory should treat wrongdoers like tort-feasors who have to pay monetary compensations to their victims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-8208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-6183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0953820800002636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Discussions ; George Sher ; Moral philosophy ; Offenders ; Political thought ; Punishment ; Victims</subject><ispartof>Utilitas, 2000-03, Vol.12 (1), p.85-90</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-c89732ba0bb52c9bb1a3db72ff3f99f583d68de2256fe5898877273ae867c5883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0953820800002636/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,27911,27912,55615</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ten, C. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims</title><title>Utilitas</title><addtitle>Utilitas</addtitle><description>Sher's notion of deserved punishment has unacceptable implications. It does not justify punishing some serious wrongdoers, who are unwilling to commit lesser wrongs, more severely than minor offenders. It requires victim-inflicted punishments which repeat the wrongdoings, with the roles reversed. But if Sher moves away from such victim-inflicted punishments, then his theory should treat wrongdoers like tort-feasors who have to pay monetary compensations to their victims.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Discussions</subject><subject>George Sher</subject><subject>Moral philosophy</subject><subject>Offenders</subject><subject>Political thought</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>0953-8208</issn><issn>1741-6183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANxy4oIC_qntzZGWUpAqAQJ6tZxkDS5NUuwEwduTqhUXJPayh_lmRzuEnDJ6wSjTl080kwI4BdoPV0LtkQHTI5YqBmKfDDZyutEPyVGMS0qZHAEbkPNrjBg-sUweutrHtwrrNrF1mYyxRufbmLRNsvBF66t4TA6cXUU82e0hebmZPk9u0_n97G5yNU8LzmWbFpBpwXNL81zyIstzZkWZa-6ccFnmJIhSQYk9qxxKyAC05lpYBKULCSCG5Gx7dx2ajw5jayofC1ytbI1NF40AANn_04NsCxahiTGgM-vgKxu-DaNmU4v5U0vvSbceH1v8-jXY8G6UFloaNXs0fEEB5mNtRj0vdhm2yoMvX9Esmy7UfQH_pPwANy1xjA</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Ten, C. L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims</title><author>Ten, C. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-c89732ba0bb52c9bb1a3db72ff3f99f583d68de2256fe5898877273ae867c5883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Discussions</topic><topic>George Sher</topic><topic>Moral philosophy</topic><topic>Offenders</topic><topic>Political thought</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ten, C. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Utilitas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ten, C. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims</atitle><jtitle>Utilitas</jtitle><addtitle>Utilitas</addtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>85-90</pages><issn>0953-8208</issn><eissn>1741-6183</eissn><abstract>Sher's notion of deserved punishment has unacceptable implications. It does not justify punishing some serious wrongdoers, who are unwilling to commit lesser wrongs, more severely than minor offenders. It requires victim-inflicted punishments which repeat the wrongdoings, with the roles reversed. But if Sher moves away from such victim-inflicted punishments, then his theory should treat wrongdoers like tort-feasors who have to pay monetary compensations to their victims.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0953820800002636</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-8208
ispartof Utilitas, 2000-03, Vol.12 (1), p.85-90
issn 0953-8208
1741-6183
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38885953
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Compensation
Discussions
George Sher
Moral philosophy
Offenders
Political thought
Punishment
Victims
title Deserved Punishment and Benefits to Victims
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deserved%20Punishment%20and%20Benefits%20to%20Victims&rft.jtitle=Utilitas&rft.au=Ten,%20C.%20L.&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=85-90&rft.issn=0953-8208&rft.eissn=1741-6183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0953820800002636&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38885953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38885953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0953820800002636&rfr_iscdi=true