PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN VERSUS JIT SYSTEMS: IS IT THE SAME?
The just-in-time (JIT) production system is notable for its emphasis on employee involvement and participation. However, we suggest that the role of participation that is most typically described in the organizational behavior (OB) literature does not match the type of participation practiced in JIT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of organizational analysis 1995-02, Vol.3 (2), p.138-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 138 |
container_title | International journal of organizational analysis |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Im, Jin H Hartman, Sandra J Folger, Robert |
description | The just-in-time (JIT) production system is notable for its emphasis on employee involvement and participation. However, we suggest that the role of participation that is most typically described in the organizational behavior (OB) literature does not match the type of participation practiced in JIT. We introduce a theoretical framework that accounts for these different perspectives: whereas the OB approach treats participation as an intervention and hence as an independent variable, the JIT approach sees it as a side effect of the JIT production system and hence a dependent variable. Understanding of the differences is essential in JIT implementation in the workplace if we are to avoid miscommunication, stress, and disbelief in the system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/eb028827 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38807758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38807758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1628-b8e2ccd3b4fa9b338389c78216276c3ee9e0942e00cbf9f99f2917c987a2eb263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p-BMCgnpTzUfbJIJIHdVV98XSbehNaLMUNjs3mw303xup241eHQ7nOe-BA8ApRlcYI35tckQ4J2wPNEjAQg8xHuyDBkZB4FHMg0NwZO0cIUwo9xvgdhAN06SVDKI06fdg0oNRNx4mragHx_FQjiR8SlIoX2Qad-UNTCR0bdqOoXTu7hgcFFlpzclvbYLRQ5y22l6n_-gyOp7GIeFezg3Rekpzv8hETimnXGjGiRuyUFNjhEHCJwYhnReiEKIgAjMtOMuIyUlIm-C8zl1Vy4-NsWu1mFltyjJ7N8uNVZRzxFjAHbysoa6W1lamUKtqtsiqL4WR-vmP2v7HUa-mM7s2nzuXVW8qZJQFyp8Q5Yeye_86flYT589qbxamysrpbmObqFbTwqmL_9Wf-98a73iu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38807758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN VERSUS JIT SYSTEMS: IS IT THE SAME?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Im, Jin H ; Hartman, Sandra J ; Folger, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Im, Jin H ; Hartman, Sandra J ; Folger, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The just-in-time (JIT) production system is notable for its emphasis on employee involvement and participation. However, we suggest that the role of participation that is most typically described in the organizational behavior (OB) literature does not match the type of participation practiced in JIT. We introduce a theoretical framework that accounts for these different perspectives: whereas the OB approach treats participation as an intervention and hence as an independent variable, the JIT approach sees it as a side effect of the JIT production system and hence a dependent variable. Understanding of the differences is essential in JIT implementation in the workplace if we are to avoid miscommunication, stress, and disbelief in the system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-3185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-0785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb028827</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Organizational analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of organizational analysis, 1995-02, Vol.3 (2), p.138-155</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1628-b8e2ccd3b4fa9b338389c78216276c3ee9e0942e00cbf9f99f2917c987a2eb263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb028827/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb028827/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11615,27903,27904,52664,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Im, Jin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Sandra J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folger, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN VERSUS JIT SYSTEMS: IS IT THE SAME?</title><title>International journal of organizational analysis</title><description>The just-in-time (JIT) production system is notable for its emphasis on employee involvement and participation. However, we suggest that the role of participation that is most typically described in the organizational behavior (OB) literature does not match the type of participation practiced in JIT. We introduce a theoretical framework that accounts for these different perspectives: whereas the OB approach treats participation as an intervention and hence as an independent variable, the JIT approach sees it as a side effect of the JIT production system and hence a dependent variable. Understanding of the differences is essential in JIT implementation in the workplace if we are to avoid miscommunication, stress, and disbelief in the system.</description><subject>Organizational analysis</subject><issn>1055-3185</issn><issn>2576-0785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p-BMCgnpTzUfbJIJIHdVV98XSbehNaLMUNjs3mw303xup241eHQ7nOe-BA8ApRlcYI35tckQ4J2wPNEjAQg8xHuyDBkZB4FHMg0NwZO0cIUwo9xvgdhAN06SVDKI06fdg0oNRNx4mragHx_FQjiR8SlIoX2Qad-UNTCR0bdqOoXTu7hgcFFlpzclvbYLRQ5y22l6n_-gyOp7GIeFezg3Rekpzv8hETimnXGjGiRuyUFNjhEHCJwYhnReiEKIgAjMtOMuIyUlIm-C8zl1Vy4-NsWu1mFltyjJ7N8uNVZRzxFjAHbysoa6W1lamUKtqtsiqL4WR-vmP2v7HUa-mM7s2nzuXVW8qZJQFyp8Q5Yeye_86flYT589qbxamysrpbmObqFbTwqmL_9Wf-98a73iu</recordid><startdate>19950201</startdate><enddate>19950201</enddate><creator>Im, Jin H</creator><creator>Hartman, Sandra J</creator><creator>Folger, Robert</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950201</creationdate><title>PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN VERSUS JIT SYSTEMS: IS IT THE SAME?</title><author>Im, Jin H ; Hartman, Sandra J ; Folger, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1628-b8e2ccd3b4fa9b338389c78216276c3ee9e0942e00cbf9f99f2917c987a2eb263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Organizational analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Im, Jin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Sandra J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folger, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of organizational analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Im, Jin H</au><au>Hartman, Sandra J</au><au>Folger, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN VERSUS JIT SYSTEMS: IS IT THE SAME?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of organizational analysis</jtitle><date>1995-02-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>138-155</pages><issn>1055-3185</issn><eissn>2576-0785</eissn><abstract>The just-in-time (JIT) production system is notable for its emphasis on employee involvement and participation. However, we suggest that the role of participation that is most typically described in the organizational behavior (OB) literature does not match the type of participation practiced in JIT. We introduce a theoretical framework that accounts for these different perspectives: whereas the OB approach treats participation as an intervention and hence as an independent variable, the JIT approach sees it as a side effect of the JIT production system and hence a dependent variable. Understanding of the differences is essential in JIT implementation in the workplace if we are to avoid miscommunication, stress, and disbelief in the system.</abstract><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb028827</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-3185 |
ispartof | International journal of organizational analysis, 1995-02, Vol.3 (2), p.138-155 |
issn | 1055-3185 2576-0785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38807758 |
source | Business Source Complete; Emerald Journals |
subjects | Organizational analysis |
title | PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN VERSUS JIT SYSTEMS: IS IT THE SAME? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PARTICIPATION%20IN%20AMERICAN%20VERSUS%20JIT%20SYSTEMS:%20IS%20IT%20THE%20SAME?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20organizational%20analysis&rft.au=Im,%20Jin%20H&rft.date=1995-02-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=138-155&rft.issn=1055-3185&rft.eissn=2576-0785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb028827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38807758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38807758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |