Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study
The classical price competition model (named after Bertrand), prescribes that in equilibrium prices are equal to marginal costs. Moreover, prices do not depend on the number of competitors. Since this outcome is not in line with real-life observations, it is known as the ‘Bertrand Paradox.’ In exper...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of industrial organization 2000, Vol.18 (1), p.7-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | International journal of industrial organization |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Dufwenberg, Martin Gneezy, Uri |
description | The classical price competition model (named after Bertrand), prescribes that in equilibrium prices are equal to marginal costs. Moreover, prices do not depend on the number of competitors. Since this outcome is not in line with real-life observations, it is known as the ‘Bertrand Paradox.’ In experimental price competition markets we find that prices do depend on the number of competitors: the Bertrand solution does not predict well when the number of competitors is two, but (after some opportunities for learning) predicts well when the number of competitors is three or four. A bounded rationality explanation of this is suggested. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00031-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38797144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167718799000314</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839824305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-280d70974bc1099ecfb1857fb9107747fe1cfdd38415ef45190f6ff3fc24c1833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkW9rFDEQxoMoeNZ-BGFREPtiNdlkbxLfSCm1CgWF6uthLzvR1Ns_JrnS-_ad7UlfCCJkZuDJb4bJEyFeKPlWSbV-d8UJalAW3jh3IqXUqjaPxIoFXYOz68di9YA8Fc9yvmbI8FmJ068peqr8NMxUYonTWHVjXw1d-kWF5dHTWFK3XLznm4puZ0pxYLHbVrns-v1z8SR020zHf-qR-P7x_NvZp_ryy8Xns9PL2oOEUjdW9iAdmI1X0jnyYaNsC2HjlAQwEEj50PfaGtVSMK1yMqxD0ME3xiur9ZF4fZg7p-n3jnLBIWZP22030rTLqC04UMYw-PIv8HrapZF3Q-VAa91qYOjVPyGrnW2Mli1T7YHyaco5UcCZH9-lPSqJi_d47z0uxqJzeO89LitcHPoSzeQfmogojv2UfuAN6k5ZTnuOhtu4xEXjmDkAmwZ_loEnfThMIrb2JlLC7CPxr_QxkS_YT_E_u9wBcPuicw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839824305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Dufwenberg, Martin ; Gneezy, Uri</creator><creatorcontrib>Dufwenberg, Martin ; Gneezy, Uri</creatorcontrib><description>The classical price competition model (named after Bertrand), prescribes that in equilibrium prices are equal to marginal costs. Moreover, prices do not depend on the number of competitors. Since this outcome is not in line with real-life observations, it is known as the ‘Bertrand Paradox.’ In experimental price competition markets we find that prices do depend on the number of competitors: the Bertrand solution does not predict well when the number of competitors is two, but (after some opportunities for learning) predicts well when the number of competitors is three or four. A bounded rationality explanation of this is suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00031-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJIODY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bertrand model ; Bounded rationality ; Competition ; Costs ; Economic concentration ; Experiment ; Experimental economics ; Industrial economics ; Learning ; Market concentration ; Noise-bidding ; Price competition ; Price models ; Prices ; Rationality ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of industrial organization, 2000, Vol.18 (1), p.7-22</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jan 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-280d70974bc1099ecfb1857fb9107747fe1cfdd38415ef45190f6ff3fc24c1833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-280d70974bc1099ecfb1857fb9107747fe1cfdd38415ef45190f6ff3fc24c1833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167718799000314$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeindorg/v_3a18_3ay_3a2000_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a7-22.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dufwenberg, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gneezy, Uri</creatorcontrib><title>Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study</title><title>International journal of industrial organization</title><description>The classical price competition model (named after Bertrand), prescribes that in equilibrium prices are equal to marginal costs. Moreover, prices do not depend on the number of competitors. Since this outcome is not in line with real-life observations, it is known as the ‘Bertrand Paradox.’ In experimental price competition markets we find that prices do depend on the number of competitors: the Bertrand solution does not predict well when the number of competitors is two, but (after some opportunities for learning) predicts well when the number of competitors is three or four. A bounded rationality explanation of this is suggested.</description><subject>Bertrand model</subject><subject>Bounded rationality</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic concentration</subject><subject>Experiment</subject><subject>Experimental economics</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Market concentration</subject><subject>Noise-bidding</subject><subject>Price competition</subject><subject>Price models</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0167-7187</issn><issn>1873-7986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkW9rFDEQxoMoeNZ-BGFREPtiNdlkbxLfSCm1CgWF6uthLzvR1Ns_JrnS-_ad7UlfCCJkZuDJb4bJEyFeKPlWSbV-d8UJalAW3jh3IqXUqjaPxIoFXYOz68di9YA8Fc9yvmbI8FmJ068peqr8NMxUYonTWHVjXw1d-kWF5dHTWFK3XLznm4puZ0pxYLHbVrns-v1z8SR020zHf-qR-P7x_NvZp_ryy8Xns9PL2oOEUjdW9iAdmI1X0jnyYaNsC2HjlAQwEEj50PfaGtVSMK1yMqxD0ME3xiur9ZF4fZg7p-n3jnLBIWZP22030rTLqC04UMYw-PIv8HrapZF3Q-VAa91qYOjVPyGrnW2Mli1T7YHyaco5UcCZH9-lPSqJi_d47z0uxqJzeO89LitcHPoSzeQfmogojv2UfuAN6k5ZTnuOhtu4xEXjmDkAmwZ_loEnfThMIrb2JlLC7CPxr_QxkS_YT_E_u9wBcPuicw</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Dufwenberg, Martin</creator><creator>Gneezy, Uri</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study</title><author>Dufwenberg, Martin ; Gneezy, Uri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c707t-280d70974bc1099ecfb1857fb9107747fe1cfdd38415ef45190f6ff3fc24c1833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Bertrand model</topic><topic>Bounded rationality</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic concentration</topic><topic>Experiment</topic><topic>Experimental economics</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Market concentration</topic><topic>Noise-bidding</topic><topic>Price competition</topic><topic>Price models</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dufwenberg, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gneezy, Uri</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of industrial organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dufwenberg, Martin</au><au>Gneezy, Uri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of industrial organization</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>7-22</pages><issn>0167-7187</issn><eissn>1873-7986</eissn><coden>IJIODY</coden><abstract>The classical price competition model (named after Bertrand), prescribes that in equilibrium prices are equal to marginal costs. Moreover, prices do not depend on the number of competitors. Since this outcome is not in line with real-life observations, it is known as the ‘Bertrand Paradox.’ In experimental price competition markets we find that prices do depend on the number of competitors: the Bertrand solution does not predict well when the number of competitors is two, but (after some opportunities for learning) predicts well when the number of competitors is three or four. A bounded rationality explanation of this is suggested.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00031-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-7187 |
ispartof | International journal of industrial organization, 2000, Vol.18 (1), p.7-22 |
issn | 0167-7187 1873-7986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38797144 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Bertrand model Bounded rationality Competition Costs Economic concentration Experiment Experimental economics Industrial economics Learning Market concentration Noise-bidding Price competition Price models Prices Rationality Studies |
title | Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A32%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Price%20competition%20and%20market%20concentration:%20an%20experimental%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20industrial%20organization&rft.au=Dufwenberg,%20Martin&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=7-22&rft.issn=0167-7187&rft.eissn=1873-7986&rft.coden=IJIODY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00031-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839824305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839824305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167718799000314&rfr_iscdi=true |