An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY

This paper examines the extent to which differences in welfare generosity across states leads to interstate migration. Using microdata from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) between 1979 and 1992, we employ a quasi-experimental design that utilizes the categorical eligibility of the w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of population economics 1999-08, Vol.12 (3), p.391-409
Hauptverfasser: Levine, Phillip B., Zimmerman, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 409
container_issue 3
container_start_page 391
container_title Journal of population economics
container_volume 12
creator Levine, Phillip B.
Zimmerman, David J.
description This paper examines the extent to which differences in welfare generosity across states leads to interstate migration. Using microdata from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) between 1979 and 1992, we employ a quasi-experimental design that utilizes the categorical eligibility of the welfare system. The pattern of cross-state moves among poor single women with children, who are likely to be eligible for benefits is compared to the pattern among other poor households. We find little evidence indicating that welfare-induced migration is a widespread phenomenon.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s001480050105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38772200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20007637</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20007637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-84f056960b9641c402f4592eb96342f03992a62a76ba1227a6b3df70e418a9833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aMQFLxVX_LSpDmWOX_A1IMO8VTSmsyOrp1Jd9h_b-ZEUPCUF96HL-89Qo4ZXDAAdRkAmMgAUmCQ7pABE8gTJlS6SwagEWONuE8OQpgDAGaZGJA8b-l4sax9XZmG5q1p1qEOtHO0f7f0xTbOeEvvzay1Pb2ypektnYa6nX31HyZPr4dkz5km2KPvd0im1-Pn0W0yeby5G-WTpBJC9EkmHKRSSyi1FKwSwJ1INbfxi4I7QK25kdwoWRrGuTKyxDenwAqWGZ0hDsn5Nnfpu4-VDX2xqENlm8a0tluFAjOlOI97DcnpHzjvVj5uFgqOIASTsEk7-w-xGMQ0izSqZKsq34XgrSuWvl4Yvy4YFJubF79uHv3J1s9D3_kfHKcCJVHhJxy6eCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230441603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Levine, Phillip B. ; Zimmerman, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levine, Phillip B. ; Zimmerman, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the extent to which differences in welfare generosity across states leads to interstate migration. Using microdata from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) between 1979 and 1992, we employ a quasi-experimental design that utilizes the categorical eligibility of the welfare system. The pattern of cross-state moves among poor single women with children, who are likely to be eligible for benefits is compared to the pattern among other poor households. We find little evidence indicating that welfare-induced migration is a widespread phenomenon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1475</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s001480050105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin, etc: Springer International</publisher><subject>Children ; Control groups ; Control variables ; Electronics benefit transfer ; Estimation bias ; Experiment design ; Experimental design ; Food stamps ; Fractions ; Geographic mobility ; Households ; Longitudinal studies ; Low income groups ; Magnets ; Migration ; Population economics ; Poverty ; Public assistance programs ; Single women ; Social security ; State government ; Trends ; U.S.A ; Welfare ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>Journal of population economics, 1999-08, Vol.12 (3), p.391-409</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-84f056960b9641c402f4592eb96342f03992a62a76ba1227a6b3df70e418a9833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20007637$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20007637$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levine, Phillip B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY</title><title>Journal of population economics</title><description>This paper examines the extent to which differences in welfare generosity across states leads to interstate migration. Using microdata from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) between 1979 and 1992, we employ a quasi-experimental design that utilizes the categorical eligibility of the welfare system. The pattern of cross-state moves among poor single women with children, who are likely to be eligible for benefits is compared to the pattern among other poor households. We find little evidence indicating that welfare-induced migration is a widespread phenomenon.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Control variables</subject><subject>Electronics benefit transfer</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Food stamps</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Geographic mobility</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Magnets</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Population economics</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Single women</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>0933-1433</issn><issn>1432-1475</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0aMQFLxVX_LSpDmWOX_A1IMO8VTSmsyOrp1Jd9h_b-ZEUPCUF96HL-89Qo4ZXDAAdRkAmMgAUmCQ7pABE8gTJlS6SwagEWONuE8OQpgDAGaZGJA8b-l4sax9XZmG5q1p1qEOtHO0f7f0xTbOeEvvzay1Pb2ypektnYa6nX31HyZPr4dkz5km2KPvd0im1-Pn0W0yeby5G-WTpBJC9EkmHKRSSyi1FKwSwJ1INbfxi4I7QK25kdwoWRrGuTKyxDenwAqWGZ0hDsn5Nnfpu4-VDX2xqENlm8a0tluFAjOlOI97DcnpHzjvVj5uFgqOIASTsEk7-w-xGMQ0izSqZKsq34XgrSuWvl4Yvy4YFJubF79uHv3J1s9D3_kfHKcCJVHhJxy6eCA</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Levine, Phillip B.</creator><creator>Zimmerman, David J.</creator><general>Springer International</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY</title><author>Levine, Phillip B. ; Zimmerman, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-84f056960b9641c402f4592eb96342f03992a62a76ba1227a6b3df70e418a9833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Control variables</topic><topic>Electronics benefit transfer</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Food stamps</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Geographic mobility</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Magnets</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Population economics</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Single women</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levine, Phillip B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of population economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levine, Phillip B.</au><au>Zimmerman, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY</atitle><jtitle>Journal of population economics</jtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>391-409</pages><issn>0933-1433</issn><eissn>1432-1475</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the extent to which differences in welfare generosity across states leads to interstate migration. Using microdata from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) between 1979 and 1992, we employ a quasi-experimental design that utilizes the categorical eligibility of the welfare system. The pattern of cross-state moves among poor single women with children, who are likely to be eligible for benefits is compared to the pattern among other poor households. We find little evidence indicating that welfare-induced migration is a widespread phenomenon.</abstract><cop>Berlin, etc</cop><pub>Springer International</pub><doi>10.1007/s001480050105</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0933-1433
ispartof Journal of population economics, 1999-08, Vol.12 (3), p.391-409
issn 0933-1433
1432-1475
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38772200
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Children
Control groups
Control variables
Electronics benefit transfer
Estimation bias
Experiment design
Experimental design
Food stamps
Fractions
Geographic mobility
Households
Longitudinal studies
Low income groups
Magnets
Migration
Population economics
Poverty
Public assistance programs
Single women
Social security
State government
Trends
U.S.A
Welfare
Welfare state
title An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Empirical%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Welfare%20Magnet%20Debate%20Using%20the%20NLSY&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20population%20economics&rft.au=Levine,%20Phillip%20B.&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=391-409&rft.issn=0933-1433&rft.eissn=1432-1475&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s001480050105&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20007637%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230441603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20007637&rfr_iscdi=true