Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences

Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology and developing societies 1994-09, Vol.6 (2), p.131-149
Hauptverfasser: Sinha, Jai B.P., Daftuar, C.N., Gupta, Rajen K., Mishra, Ramesh C., Jayseetha, R., Jha, S.S., Verma, Jyoti, Vijayakumar, V.S.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Psychology and developing societies
container_volume 6
creator Sinha, Jai B.P.
Daftuar, C.N.
Gupta, Rajen K.
Mishra, Ramesh C.
Jayseetha, R.
Jha, S.S.
Verma, Jyoti
Vijayakumar, V.S.R.
description Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure. The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/097133369400600204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38745890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_097133369400600204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1297692820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKuAoBtj584k81hqfULBonUdJpObMiVN6ky68N87tRVEcXUffOfAOYScAr0CkHJEtQTOudAZpYJSRrM9MohPnlIpYP9rh3RDHJKjEBYR4UqzAZm94Nx1rWmSV7d0jfGudxgS01bJratr9NjaeLs2mWK3avAiJDfYOKzDZTL1xvbO7vCpx2_8mBzUpgl4sptD8nZ_Nxs_ppPnh6fx9SS1TECfMmC2lNZQWaKiVSWA0kxZVRnQYBmvZVbnmkmeM6s0qNLkIITGqsZMSl3yITnf-q58977G0BdLFyw2jWmxW4eCK5nlStMInv0CF93ax9ShAKal0EyxDcW2lPVdCDFOsfJuafxHAbTY1Fz8rTmKRltRMHP8Yfu_4hOt6Hti</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297692820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Sinha, Jai B.P. ; Daftuar, C.N. ; Gupta, Rajen K. ; Mishra, Ramesh C. ; Jayseetha, R. ; Jha, S.S. ; Verma, Jyoti ; Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Jai B.P. ; Daftuar, C.N. ; Gupta, Rajen K. ; Mishra, Ramesh C. ; Jayseetha, R. ; Jha, S.S. ; Verma, Jyoti ; Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure. The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-3336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-0761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/097133369400600204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Collectivism ; India ; Regional disparities</subject><ispartof>Psychology and developing societies, 1994-09, Vol.6 (2), p.131-149</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/097133369400600204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133369400600204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27856,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Jai B.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daftuar, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Ramesh C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayseetha, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</title><title>Psychology and developing societies</title><description>Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure. The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Regional disparities</subject><issn>0971-3336</issn><issn>0973-0761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKuAoBtj584k81hqfULBonUdJpObMiVN6ky68N87tRVEcXUffOfAOYScAr0CkHJEtQTOudAZpYJSRrM9MohPnlIpYP9rh3RDHJKjEBYR4UqzAZm94Nx1rWmSV7d0jfGudxgS01bJratr9NjaeLs2mWK3avAiJDfYOKzDZTL1xvbO7vCpx2_8mBzUpgl4sptD8nZ_Nxs_ppPnh6fx9SS1TECfMmC2lNZQWaKiVSWA0kxZVRnQYBmvZVbnmkmeM6s0qNLkIITGqsZMSl3yITnf-q58977G0BdLFyw2jWmxW4eCK5nlStMInv0CF93ax9ShAKal0EyxDcW2lPVdCDFOsfJuafxHAbTY1Fz8rTmKRltRMHP8Yfu_4hOt6Hti</recordid><startdate>199409</startdate><enddate>199409</enddate><creator>Sinha, Jai B.P.</creator><creator>Daftuar, C.N.</creator><creator>Gupta, Rajen K.</creator><creator>Mishra, Ramesh C.</creator><creator>Jayseetha, R.</creator><creator>Jha, S.S.</creator><creator>Verma, Jyoti</creator><creator>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications India</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199409</creationdate><title>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</title><author>Sinha, Jai B.P. ; Daftuar, C.N. ; Gupta, Rajen K. ; Mishra, Ramesh C. ; Jayseetha, R. ; Jha, S.S. ; Verma, Jyoti ; Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Regional disparities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Jai B.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daftuar, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Ramesh C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayseetha, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychology and developing societies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinha, Jai B.P.</au><au>Daftuar, C.N.</au><au>Gupta, Rajen K.</au><au>Mishra, Ramesh C.</au><au>Jayseetha, R.</au><au>Jha, S.S.</au><au>Verma, Jyoti</au><au>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</atitle><jtitle>Psychology and developing societies</jtitle><date>1994-09</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>131-149</pages><issn>0971-3336</issn><eissn>0973-0761</eissn><abstract>Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure. The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/097133369400600204</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0971-3336
ispartof Psychology and developing societies, 1994-09, Vol.6 (2), p.131-149
issn 0971-3336
0973-0761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38745890
source Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Beliefs
Collectivism
India
Regional disparities
title Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A51%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Similarities%20and%20Differences%20in%20People's%20Beliefs,%20Practices%20and%20Preferences&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20and%20developing%20societies&rft.au=Sinha,%20Jai%20B.P.&rft.date=1994-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=131-149&rft.issn=0971-3336&rft.eissn=0973-0761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/097133369400600204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297692820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297692820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_097133369400600204&rfr_iscdi=true