Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences
Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology and developing societies 1994-09, Vol.6 (2), p.131-149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 149 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Psychology and developing societies |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Sinha, Jai B.P. Daftuar, C.N. Gupta, Rajen K. Mishra, Ramesh C. Jayseetha, R. Jha, S.S. Verma, Jyoti Vijayakumar, V.S.R. |
description | Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure.
The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/097133369400600204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38745890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_097133369400600204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1297692820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKuAoBtj584k81hqfULBonUdJpObMiVN6ky68N87tRVEcXUffOfAOYScAr0CkHJEtQTOudAZpYJSRrM9MohPnlIpYP9rh3RDHJKjEBYR4UqzAZm94Nx1rWmSV7d0jfGudxgS01bJratr9NjaeLs2mWK3avAiJDfYOKzDZTL1xvbO7vCpx2_8mBzUpgl4sptD8nZ_Nxs_ppPnh6fx9SS1TECfMmC2lNZQWaKiVSWA0kxZVRnQYBmvZVbnmkmeM6s0qNLkIITGqsZMSl3yITnf-q58977G0BdLFyw2jWmxW4eCK5nlStMInv0CF93ax9ShAKal0EyxDcW2lPVdCDFOsfJuafxHAbTY1Fz8rTmKRltRMHP8Yfu_4hOt6Hti</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297692820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Sinha, Jai B.P. ; Daftuar, C.N. ; Gupta, Rajen K. ; Mishra, Ramesh C. ; Jayseetha, R. ; Jha, S.S. ; Verma, Jyoti ; Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Jai B.P. ; Daftuar, C.N. ; Gupta, Rajen K. ; Mishra, Ramesh C. ; Jayseetha, R. ; Jha, S.S. ; Verma, Jyoti ; Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure.
The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-3336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-0761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/097133369400600204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Collectivism ; India ; Regional disparities</subject><ispartof>Psychology and developing societies, 1994-09, Vol.6 (2), p.131-149</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/097133369400600204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133369400600204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27856,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Jai B.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daftuar, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Ramesh C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayseetha, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</title><title>Psychology and developing societies</title><description>Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure.
The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Regional disparities</subject><issn>0971-3336</issn><issn>0973-0761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKuAoBtj584k81hqfULBonUdJpObMiVN6ky68N87tRVEcXUffOfAOYScAr0CkHJEtQTOudAZpYJSRrM9MohPnlIpYP9rh3RDHJKjEBYR4UqzAZm94Nx1rWmSV7d0jfGudxgS01bJratr9NjaeLs2mWK3avAiJDfYOKzDZTL1xvbO7vCpx2_8mBzUpgl4sptD8nZ_Nxs_ppPnh6fx9SS1TECfMmC2lNZQWaKiVSWA0kxZVRnQYBmvZVbnmkmeM6s0qNLkIITGqsZMSl3yITnf-q58977G0BdLFyw2jWmxW4eCK5nlStMInv0CF93ax9ShAKal0EyxDcW2lPVdCDFOsfJuafxHAbTY1Fz8rTmKRltRMHP8Yfu_4hOt6Hti</recordid><startdate>199409</startdate><enddate>199409</enddate><creator>Sinha, Jai B.P.</creator><creator>Daftuar, C.N.</creator><creator>Gupta, Rajen K.</creator><creator>Mishra, Ramesh C.</creator><creator>Jayseetha, R.</creator><creator>Jha, S.S.</creator><creator>Verma, Jyoti</creator><creator>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications India</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199409</creationdate><title>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</title><author>Sinha, Jai B.P. ; Daftuar, C.N. ; Gupta, Rajen K. ; Mishra, Ramesh C. ; Jayseetha, R. ; Jha, S.S. ; Verma, Jyoti ; Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-212cb7ca07be80dd610048c8da191c23f74f5927352c8918ba51669edfe4779b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Regional disparities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Jai B.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daftuar, C.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Ramesh C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayseetha, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychology and developing societies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinha, Jai B.P.</au><au>Daftuar, C.N.</au><au>Gupta, Rajen K.</au><au>Mishra, Ramesh C.</au><au>Jayseetha, R.</au><au>Jha, S.S.</au><au>Verma, Jyoti</au><au>Vijayakumar, V.S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences</atitle><jtitle>Psychology and developing societies</jtitle><date>1994-09</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>131-149</pages><issn>0971-3336</issn><eissn>0973-0761</eissn><abstract>Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure.
The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/097133369400600204</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0971-3336 |
ispartof | Psychology and developing societies, 1994-09, Vol.6 (2), p.131-149 |
issn | 0971-3336 0973-0761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38745890 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Beliefs Collectivism India Regional disparities |
title | Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs, Practices and Preferences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A51%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Similarities%20and%20Differences%20in%20People's%20Beliefs,%20Practices%20and%20Preferences&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20and%20developing%20societies&rft.au=Sinha,%20Jai%20B.P.&rft.date=1994-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=131-149&rft.issn=0971-3336&rft.eissn=0973-0761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/097133369400600204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297692820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297692820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_097133369400600204&rfr_iscdi=true |