Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial
Aims. In an additive design, test the efficacy of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention as an adjunct to current standard cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Design. Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting. Outpatient behavioral medicine clinic. Participants....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 1999-05, Vol.94 (5), p.685-695 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 695 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 685 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Niaura, Raymond Abrams, David B. Shadel, William G. Rohsenow, Damaris J. Monti, Peter M. Sirota, Alan D. |
description | Aims. In an additive design, test the efficacy of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention as an adjunct to current standard cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Design. Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting. Outpatient behavioral medicine clinic. Participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine cigarette smokers recruited through newspaper advertisements. Intervention. After receiving an initial counseling session for cessation and setting a quit day, 129 smokers were randomly assigned to one of four relapse prevention treatment conditions: (1) brief cognitive behavioral; (2) cognitive behavioral and nicorette gum; (3) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure; and (4) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure with nicorette gum. All smokers met individually with their counselor for six RP sessions. Measures. Seven‐day, point‐prevalence abstinence rates (CO verified) taken at 1, 3, 6 and 12‐months post‐treatment and time to first slip. Findings. All manipulation checks and process measures suggested that the treatments were delivered as intended. There were no significant differences between conditions in point‐prevalence abstinence rates or in time to first slip. Conclusions. These results call into question the utility of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9456856.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38728070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38728070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-e52dd1d0d62b4260f5b50c596db5d0a595d1ff5975442df6f63b6568d34139723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1u1DAUhS0EokPhFVBUIXYJ1_FP4u7aKbRI1SD-xNJyYgd56sTBTmD69niUqCB2rCzL3zn3-kPoDEOBgfI3-wITDjlQSgoshCgEZbxmvDg8QpuHp8doA4KzvMQUTtCzGPcAUNWCPkUnGBgnQMgGfdrOJjOH0cc5mGwKRk29Gaas8yGLvb-zw_csGKfGaLIxmJ_pzfrhPFNZ64cpeOeMzlpnB9sql_JWuefoSadcNC_W8xR9fff2y_Ymv_1w_X57cZu3lNc8N6zUGmvQvGxoyaFjDYOWCa4bpkExwTTuOiYqRmmpO95x0vD0T00oJqIqySl6vfSOwf-YTZxkb2NrnFOD8XOUpK7KGipI4Nk_4N7PYUi7yaSPsZLjKkHnC9QGH2MwnRyD7VW4lxjkUbvcy6NbeXR7zAm5apeHFH65Tpib3ui_oovnBLxaARWTqC6oobXxD1cDJhVL2OWC_bLO3P_HBvLi6mq9pJJ8KbFxMoeHEhXuJK_SFPltdy1vxOVnzHY7-ZH8Bhe0rTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199552617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Niaura, Raymond ; Abrams, David B. ; Shadel, William G. ; Rohsenow, Damaris J. ; Monti, Peter M. ; Sirota, Alan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Niaura, Raymond ; Abrams, David B. ; Shadel, William G. ; Rohsenow, Damaris J. ; Monti, Peter M. ; Sirota, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims. In an additive design, test the efficacy of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention as an adjunct to current standard cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Design. Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting. Outpatient behavioral medicine clinic. Participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine cigarette smokers recruited through newspaper advertisements. Intervention. After receiving an initial counseling session for cessation and setting a quit day, 129 smokers were randomly assigned to one of four relapse prevention treatment conditions: (1) brief cognitive behavioral; (2) cognitive behavioral and nicorette gum; (3) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure; and (4) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure with nicorette gum. All smokers met individually with their counselor for six RP sessions. Measures. Seven‐day, point‐prevalence abstinence rates (CO verified) taken at 1, 3, 6 and 12‐months post‐treatment and time to first slip. Findings. All manipulation checks and process measures suggested that the treatments were delivered as intended. There were no significant differences between conditions in point‐prevalence abstinence rates or in time to first slip. Conclusions. These results call into question the utility of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9456856.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10563033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADICE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Addiction ; Adult ; Behavior modification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive Therapy - methods ; Cues ; Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Prevention ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Secondary Prevention ; Smoking ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Prevention ; Substance abuse treatment ; Therapy ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 1999-05, Vol.94 (5), p.685-695</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company May 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-e52dd1d0d62b4260f5b50c596db5d0a595d1ff5975442df6f63b6568d34139723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1360-0443.1999.9456856.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1360-0443.1999.9456856.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1801375$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10563033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niaura, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadel, William G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohsenow, Damaris J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirota, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>Aims. In an additive design, test the efficacy of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention as an adjunct to current standard cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Design. Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting. Outpatient behavioral medicine clinic. Participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine cigarette smokers recruited through newspaper advertisements. Intervention. After receiving an initial counseling session for cessation and setting a quit day, 129 smokers were randomly assigned to one of four relapse prevention treatment conditions: (1) brief cognitive behavioral; (2) cognitive behavioral and nicorette gum; (3) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure; and (4) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure with nicorette gum. All smokers met individually with their counselor for six RP sessions. Measures. Seven‐day, point‐prevalence abstinence rates (CO verified) taken at 1, 3, 6 and 12‐months post‐treatment and time to first slip. Findings. All manipulation checks and process measures suggested that the treatments were delivered as intended. There were no significant differences between conditions in point‐prevalence abstinence rates or in time to first slip. Conclusions. These results call into question the utility of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention.</description><subject>Addiction</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM1u1DAUhS0EokPhFVBUIXYJ1_FP4u7aKbRI1SD-xNJyYgd56sTBTmD69niUqCB2rCzL3zn3-kPoDEOBgfI3-wITDjlQSgoshCgEZbxmvDg8QpuHp8doA4KzvMQUTtCzGPcAUNWCPkUnGBgnQMgGfdrOJjOH0cc5mGwKRk29Gaas8yGLvb-zw_csGKfGaLIxmJ_pzfrhPFNZ64cpeOeMzlpnB9sql_JWuefoSadcNC_W8xR9fff2y_Ymv_1w_X57cZu3lNc8N6zUGmvQvGxoyaFjDYOWCa4bpkExwTTuOiYqRmmpO95x0vD0T00oJqIqySl6vfSOwf-YTZxkb2NrnFOD8XOUpK7KGipI4Nk_4N7PYUi7yaSPsZLjKkHnC9QGH2MwnRyD7VW4lxjkUbvcy6NbeXR7zAm5apeHFH65Tpib3ui_oovnBLxaARWTqC6oobXxD1cDJhVL2OWC_bLO3P_HBvLi6mq9pJJ8KbFxMoeHEhXuJK_SFPltdy1vxOVnzHY7-ZH8Bhe0rTg</recordid><startdate>199905</startdate><enddate>199905</enddate><creator>Niaura, Raymond</creator><creator>Abrams, David B.</creator><creator>Shadel, William G.</creator><creator>Rohsenow, Damaris J.</creator><creator>Monti, Peter M.</creator><creator>Sirota, Alan D.</creator><general>Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199905</creationdate><title>Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial</title><author>Niaura, Raymond ; Abrams, David B. ; Shadel, William G. ; Rohsenow, Damaris J. ; Monti, Peter M. ; Sirota, Alan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-e52dd1d0d62b4260f5b50c596db5d0a595d1ff5975442df6f63b6568d34139723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Addiction</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niaura, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadel, William G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohsenow, Damaris J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirota, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niaura, Raymond</au><au>Abrams, David B.</au><au>Shadel, William G.</au><au>Rohsenow, Damaris J.</au><au>Monti, Peter M.</au><au>Sirota, Alan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>1999-05</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>685-695</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><coden>ADICE5</coden><abstract>Aims. In an additive design, test the efficacy of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention as an adjunct to current standard cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Design. Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting. Outpatient behavioral medicine clinic. Participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine cigarette smokers recruited through newspaper advertisements. Intervention. After receiving an initial counseling session for cessation and setting a quit day, 129 smokers were randomly assigned to one of four relapse prevention treatment conditions: (1) brief cognitive behavioral; (2) cognitive behavioral and nicorette gum; (3) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure; and (4) cognitive behavioral and cue exposure with nicorette gum. All smokers met individually with their counselor for six RP sessions. Measures. Seven‐day, point‐prevalence abstinence rates (CO verified) taken at 1, 3, 6 and 12‐months post‐treatment and time to first slip. Findings. All manipulation checks and process measures suggested that the treatments were delivered as intended. There were no significant differences between conditions in point‐prevalence abstinence rates or in time to first slip. Conclusions. These results call into question the utility of cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>10563033</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9456856.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 1999-05, Vol.94 (5), p.685-695 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38728070 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Addiction Adult Behavior modification Biological and medical sciences Clinical trials Cognitive Therapy - methods Cues Desintoxication. Drug withdrawal Female Humans Male Medical sciences Medical treatment Prevention Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Secondary Prevention Smoking Smoking - psychology Smoking cessation Smoking Prevention Substance abuse treatment Therapy Treatments |
title | Cue exposure treatment for smoking relapse prevention: a controlled clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cue%20exposure%20treatment%20for%20smoking%20relapse%20prevention:%20a%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Niaura,%20Raymond&rft.date=1999-05&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=685-695&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft.coden=ADICE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9456856.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38728070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199552617&rft_id=info:pmid/10563033&rfr_iscdi=true |