Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options

Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options

ENDA has carried out a case study that examines the technical and financial frameworks needed by a sub-Saharan country such as Senegal to contribute to international greenhouse gas abatement efforts whilst at the same time guaranteeing its social and economic development. The study was part of the U...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 1994-11, Vol.22 (11), p.947-954
Hauptverfasser: Amous, Samir, Revet, Dominique, Sokona, Youba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Air pollution
Climate
Energy policy
Global warming
Greenhouse gas abatement
No regrets options
Pollution control
Senegal
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 954
container_issue 11
container_start_page 947
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 22
creator Amous, Samir
Revet, Dominique
Sokona, Youba
description ENDA has carried out a case study that examines the technical and financial frameworks needed by a sub-Saharan country such as Senegal to contribute to international greenhouse gas abatement efforts whilst at the same time guaranteeing its social and economic development. The study was part of the UNEP Greenhouse Gas Costing Studies. The first stage of the study was to make a preliminary inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the base year 1988. Following this seven no regret technical options for emission reduction were investigated and the costs calculated, allowing the identification of three least-cost options. The three least-cost options must be implemented first because of their negative costs. The economic benefits of both abatement scenarios are characterized by a negative global cost whatever the discount rate is
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90042-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38711204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0301421594900426</els_id><sourcerecordid>38711204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-b85255d2c6c23dc6ddc96ecbc57924e36873f99b3230181cfc1623fcfb4308da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1rGzEQFSWFOmn_QQ86heawib5Wu7oUTEic0kAObc9COztrq6xXG0k2-N9HrouPGZgZwbz3eHqEfOXsljOu75hkvFKC19-MujGMKVHpD2TB20ZWummaC7I4Qz6Ry5T-sgJqjVqQx1VEnDZhl5CuXaKucxm3OGXqJ_oLJ1y7kS4puHJPedcfaBjoiC7lCkLKNMzZhyl9Jh8HNyb88n9fkT-PD7_vn6rnl9WP--VzBYrJXHVtLeq6F6BByB5034PRCB3UjREKpS6OB2M6KYrdlsMAXAs5wNApydreyStyfdKdY3jdYcp26xPgOLoJyx-sbBvOBVMFqE5AiCGliIOdo9-6eLCc2WNo9piIPSZijbL_QrO60H6eaBFnhDMHS004h9HurXRClHEozU2hSuePT17GXNqoxppa2U3eFrXvJzUskew9RpvA4wTY-4iQbR_8-3beAGWijBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38711204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Amous, Samir ; Revet, Dominique ; Sokona, Youba</creator><creatorcontrib>Amous, Samir ; Revet, Dominique ; Sokona, Youba</creatorcontrib><description>ENDA has carried out a case study that examines the technical and financial frameworks needed by a sub-Saharan country such as Senegal to contribute to international greenhouse gas abatement efforts whilst at the same time guaranteeing its social and economic development. The study was part of the UNEP Greenhouse Gas Costing Studies. The first stage of the study was to make a preliminary inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the base year 1988. Following this seven no regret technical options for emission reduction were investigated and the costs calculated, allowing the identification of three least-cost options. The three least-cost options must be implemented first because of their negative costs. The economic benefits of both abatement scenarios are characterized by a negative global cost whatever the discount rate is</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90042-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Climate ; Energy policy ; Global warming ; Greenhouse gas abatement ; No regrets options ; Pollution control ; Senegal</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 1994-11, Vol.22 (11), p.947-954</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-b85255d2c6c23dc6ddc96ecbc57924e36873f99b3230181cfc1623fcfb4308da3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90042-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,3998,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a22_3ay_3a1994_3ai_3a11_3ap_3a947-954.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amous, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revet, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokona, Youba</creatorcontrib><title>Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>ENDA has carried out a case study that examines the technical and financial frameworks needed by a sub-Saharan country such as Senegal to contribute to international greenhouse gas abatement efforts whilst at the same time guaranteeing its social and economic development. The study was part of the UNEP Greenhouse Gas Costing Studies. The first stage of the study was to make a preliminary inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the base year 1988. Following this seven no regret technical options for emission reduction were investigated and the costs calculated, allowing the identification of three least-cost options. The three least-cost options must be implemented first because of their negative costs. The economic benefits of both abatement scenarios are characterized by a negative global cost whatever the discount rate is</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse gas abatement</subject><subject>No regrets options</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Senegal</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1rGzEQFSWFOmn_QQ86heawib5Wu7oUTEic0kAObc9COztrq6xXG0k2-N9HrouPGZgZwbz3eHqEfOXsljOu75hkvFKC19-MujGMKVHpD2TB20ZWummaC7I4Qz6Ry5T-sgJqjVqQx1VEnDZhl5CuXaKucxm3OGXqJ_oLJ1y7kS4puHJPedcfaBjoiC7lCkLKNMzZhyl9Jh8HNyb88n9fkT-PD7_vn6rnl9WP--VzBYrJXHVtLeq6F6BByB5034PRCB3UjREKpS6OB2M6KYrdlsMAXAs5wNApydreyStyfdKdY3jdYcp26xPgOLoJyx-sbBvOBVMFqE5AiCGliIOdo9-6eLCc2WNo9piIPSZijbL_QrO60H6eaBFnhDMHS004h9HurXRClHEozU2hSuePT17GXNqoxppa2U3eFrXvJzUskew9RpvA4wTY-4iQbR_8-3beAGWijBY</recordid><startdate>19941101</startdate><enddate>19941101</enddate><creator>Amous, Samir</creator><creator>Revet, Dominique</creator><creator>Sokona, Youba</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941101</creationdate><title>Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options</title><author>Amous, Samir ; Revet, Dominique ; Sokona, Youba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-b85255d2c6c23dc6ddc96ecbc57924e36873f99b3230181cfc1623fcfb4308da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse gas abatement</topic><topic>No regrets options</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Senegal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amous, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revet, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokona, Youba</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amous, Samir</au><au>Revet, Dominique</au><au>Sokona, Youba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>1994-11-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>947</spage><epage>954</epage><pages>947-954</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>ENDA has carried out a case study that examines the technical and financial frameworks needed by a sub-Saharan country such as Senegal to contribute to international greenhouse gas abatement efforts whilst at the same time guaranteeing its social and economic development. The study was part of the UNEP Greenhouse Gas Costing Studies. The first stage of the study was to make a preliminary inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the base year 1988. Following this seven no regret technical options for emission reduction were investigated and the costs calculated, allowing the identification of three least-cost options. The three least-cost options must be implemented first because of their negative costs. The economic benefits of both abatement scenarios are characterized by a negative global cost whatever the discount rate is</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0301-4215(94)90042-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 1994-11, Vol.22 (11), p.947-954
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38711204
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Air pollution
Climate
Energy policy
Global warming
Greenhouse gas abatement
No regrets options
Pollution control
Senegal
title Greenhouse gas abatement in Senegal A case study of least-cost options
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greenhouse%20gas%20abatement%20in%20Senegal%20A%20case%20study%20of%20least-cost%20options&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Amous,%20Samir&rft.date=1994-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=947&rft.epage=954&rft.pages=947-954&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90042-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38711204%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38711204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0301421594900426&rfr_iscdi=true