Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States

In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of urban economics 1999-03, Vol.45 (2), p.228-239
Hauptverfasser: Xie, Danyang, Zou, Heng-fu, Davoodi, Hamid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 2
container_start_page 228
container_title Journal of urban economics
container_volume 45
creator Xie, Danyang
Zou, Heng-fu
Davoodi, Hamid
description In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/juec.1998.2095
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38676558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0094119098920952</els_id><sourcerecordid>38676558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLAzEYxIMoWB9XzwuCt615bLLJTfFRFcGDeg5p9luask1qkir615ulehE8TOaQ3zcMg9AJwVOCsThfbsBOiVJySrHiO2hCitUKC7mLJhirpiZE4X10kNISY0K4FBN0ceuSNUN1DRZ8jmZwXya74Cvju-rGBh9WzlazGD7yonK-yguoXr3L0FXP2WRIR2ivN0OC4x8_RK-3Ny9Xd_Xj0-z-6vKxtoLyXKumnxPo50aYjnZKNrTv8bxlsuUtAcbbjmLGlSFCUQHWdlxILticEoKhxYYdorNt7jqGtw2krFelOQyD8RA2STMpWsG5LODpH3AZNtGXbprItiVMYdoUarqlbAwpRej1OrqViZ-aYD3Oqcc59TinHucsBw_bgwjr8vFLA8AIBq_fNTMNL89nUblTxVwRLVqPTksSU3qRVyVMbsOgLPbuIOpkHXgLnYtgs-6C-6_HN2f5k3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877139024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Xie, Danyang ; Zou, Heng-fu ; Davoodi, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Danyang ; Zou, Heng-fu ; Davoodi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-1190</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/juec.1998.2095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic growth ; Fiscal policy ; Local government ; Public expenditure ; U.S.A ; Urban economics</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban economics, 1999-03, Vol.45 (2), p.228-239</ispartof><rights>1999 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2095$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,4009,27873,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejuecon/v_3a45_3ay_3a1999_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a228-239.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Danyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Heng-fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoodi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</title><title>Journal of urban economics</title><description>In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.</description><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Public expenditure</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Urban economics</subject><issn>0094-1190</issn><issn>1095-9068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLAzEYxIMoWB9XzwuCt615bLLJTfFRFcGDeg5p9luask1qkir615ulehE8TOaQ3zcMg9AJwVOCsThfbsBOiVJySrHiO2hCitUKC7mLJhirpiZE4X10kNISY0K4FBN0ceuSNUN1DRZ8jmZwXya74Cvju-rGBh9WzlazGD7yonK-yguoXr3L0FXP2WRIR2ivN0OC4x8_RK-3Ny9Xd_Xj0-z-6vKxtoLyXKumnxPo50aYjnZKNrTv8bxlsuUtAcbbjmLGlSFCUQHWdlxILticEoKhxYYdorNt7jqGtw2krFelOQyD8RA2STMpWsG5LODpH3AZNtGXbprItiVMYdoUarqlbAwpRej1OrqViZ-aYD3Oqcc59TinHucsBw_bgwjr8vFLA8AIBq_fNTMNL89nUblTxVwRLVqPTksSU3qRVyVMbsOgLPbuIOpkHXgLnYtgs-6C-6_HN2f5k3k</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Xie, Danyang</creator><creator>Zou, Heng-fu</creator><creator>Davoodi, Hamid</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</title><author>Xie, Danyang ; Zou, Heng-fu ; Davoodi, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Public expenditure</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Urban economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Danyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Heng-fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoodi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Danyang</au><au>Zou, Heng-fu</au><au>Davoodi, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban economics</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>228-239</pages><issn>0094-1190</issn><eissn>1095-9068</eissn><abstract>In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1006/juec.1998.2095</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-1190
ispartof Journal of urban economics, 1999-03, Vol.45 (2), p.228-239
issn 0094-1190
1095-9068
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38676558
source RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Economic growth
Fiscal policy
Local government
Public expenditure
U.S.A
Urban economics
title Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T13%3A54%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fiscal%20Decentralization%20and%20Economic%20Growth%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Xie,%20Danyang&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=228-239&rft.issn=0094-1190&rft.eissn=1095-9068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/juec.1998.2095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38676558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877139024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0094119098920952&rfr_iscdi=true