Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States
In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of urban economics 1999-03, Vol.45 (2), p.228-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 228 |
container_title | Journal of urban economics |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Xie, Danyang Zou, Heng-fu Davoodi, Hamid |
description | In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/juec.1998.2095 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38676558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0094119098920952</els_id><sourcerecordid>38676558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLAzEYxIMoWB9XzwuCt615bLLJTfFRFcGDeg5p9luask1qkir615ulehE8TOaQ3zcMg9AJwVOCsThfbsBOiVJySrHiO2hCitUKC7mLJhirpiZE4X10kNISY0K4FBN0ceuSNUN1DRZ8jmZwXya74Cvju-rGBh9WzlazGD7yonK-yguoXr3L0FXP2WRIR2ivN0OC4x8_RK-3Ny9Xd_Xj0-z-6vKxtoLyXKumnxPo50aYjnZKNrTv8bxlsuUtAcbbjmLGlSFCUQHWdlxILticEoKhxYYdorNt7jqGtw2krFelOQyD8RA2STMpWsG5LODpH3AZNtGXbprItiVMYdoUarqlbAwpRej1OrqViZ-aYD3Oqcc59TinHucsBw_bgwjr8vFLA8AIBq_fNTMNL89nUblTxVwRLVqPTksSU3qRVyVMbsOgLPbuIOpkHXgLnYtgs-6C-6_HN2f5k3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877139024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Xie, Danyang ; Zou, Heng-fu ; Davoodi, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Danyang ; Zou, Heng-fu ; Davoodi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-1190</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/juec.1998.2095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, N.Y: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic growth ; Fiscal policy ; Local government ; Public expenditure ; U.S.A ; Urban economics</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban economics, 1999-03, Vol.45 (2), p.228-239</ispartof><rights>1999 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2095$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,4009,27873,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejuecon/v_3a45_3ay_3a1999_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a228-239.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Danyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Heng-fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoodi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</title><title>Journal of urban economics</title><description>In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.</description><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Public expenditure</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Urban economics</subject><issn>0094-1190</issn><issn>1095-9068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLAzEYxIMoWB9XzwuCt615bLLJTfFRFcGDeg5p9luask1qkir615ulehE8TOaQ3zcMg9AJwVOCsThfbsBOiVJySrHiO2hCitUKC7mLJhirpiZE4X10kNISY0K4FBN0ceuSNUN1DRZ8jmZwXya74Cvju-rGBh9WzlazGD7yonK-yguoXr3L0FXP2WRIR2ivN0OC4x8_RK-3Ny9Xd_Xj0-z-6vKxtoLyXKumnxPo50aYjnZKNrTv8bxlsuUtAcbbjmLGlSFCUQHWdlxILticEoKhxYYdorNt7jqGtw2krFelOQyD8RA2STMpWsG5LODpH3AZNtGXbprItiVMYdoUarqlbAwpRej1OrqViZ-aYD3Oqcc59TinHucsBw_bgwjr8vFLA8AIBq_fNTMNL89nUblTxVwRLVqPTksSU3qRVyVMbsOgLPbuIOpkHXgLnYtgs-6C-6_HN2f5k3k</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Xie, Danyang</creator><creator>Zou, Heng-fu</creator><creator>Davoodi, Hamid</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</title><author>Xie, Danyang ; Zou, Heng-fu ; Davoodi, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-94fb1efba6ad2d9842ff0b7387571e357d20359a16926eccd568563b2110e70a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Public expenditure</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Urban economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Danyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Heng-fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoodi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Danyang</au><au>Zou, Heng-fu</au><au>Davoodi, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban economics</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>228-239</pages><issn>0094-1190</issn><eissn>1095-9068</eissn><abstract>In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth.</abstract><cop>New York, N.Y</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1006/juec.1998.2095</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-1190 |
ispartof | Journal of urban economics, 1999-03, Vol.45 (2), p.228-239 |
issn | 0094-1190 1095-9068 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38676558 |
source | RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Economic growth Fiscal policy Local government Public expenditure U.S.A Urban economics |
title | Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T13%3A54%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fiscal%20Decentralization%20and%20Economic%20Growth%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Xie,%20Danyang&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=228-239&rft.issn=0094-1190&rft.eissn=1095-9068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/juec.1998.2095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38676558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877139024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0094119098920952&rfr_iscdi=true |