Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis
In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maint...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European economic review 1998-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1221-1249 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1249 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1221 |
container_title | European economic review |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Chin, Daniel M. Miller, Preston J. |
description | In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38614203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001429219700069X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1518359757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhk1JoZu0P6FgWgjNYVLLHo_tXkoIzQcs9NAc9ma8Hs3GYT429syS_ff1ZEMOhVCDLJCe90VIhHwGdg4Mqu9_GIOy4IbDN6POGGOVKVbvyAK0EoVUfHVEFq_IB3Kc0kOGILcX5PYqPGFNd-mcNu3gxtBvKD75e9dvkEY3YvpBL2i9710XPN1gj9G1FB-n0IZ1DFNHXe_afQrpI3nfuDbhp5d8Qu6uft1d3hTL39e3lxfLwksFY-GrRipZCy0RStS1cR6ddoKvawfa8IZrpbhmqLDkiilu1uvc9MJVrEEjTsjpwXYbh8cJ02i7kDy2retxmJIVuoKSM5HBL_-AD8MU87DJgtEgKiZmt69vQhK0kEZJlSl5oHwcUorY2G0MnYt7C8zOJ7DPJ7Dzfq1R9vkEdpV1y4Mu4hb9qwjn5yPu7M4KV_L87XOAMTqnkEPl2M4lng2Bl8bej122-3mww7zeXcBokw_Ye6xDRD_aegj_GegvQYemAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518359757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Chin, Daniel M. ; Miller, Preston J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daniel M. ; Miller, Preston J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-572X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EERVAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam, etc: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Budgetary policy ; Comparative analysis ; Dynamic general equilibrium ; Dynamic models ; Equilibrium ; Exchange rate policy ; Exchange rate regimes ; Exchange rates ; Fixed exchange rates ; Floating exchange rates ; Foreign exchange rates ; General economic equilibrium ; Mathematical models ; Monetary policy ; Policy co-ordination ; Social planning ; Studies ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>European economic review, 1998-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1221-1249</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,4007,27868,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeeecrev/v_3a42_3ay_3a1998_3ai_3a7_3ap_3a1221-1249.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Preston J.</creatorcontrib><title>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</title><title>European economic review</title><description>In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.</description><subject>Budgetary policy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dynamic general equilibrium</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Exchange rate policy</subject><subject>Exchange rate regimes</subject><subject>Exchange rates</subject><subject>Fixed exchange rates</subject><subject>Floating exchange rates</subject><subject>Foreign exchange rates</subject><subject>General economic equilibrium</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Policy co-ordination</subject><subject>Social planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>0014-2921</issn><issn>1873-572X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhk1JoZu0P6FgWgjNYVLLHo_tXkoIzQcs9NAc9ma8Hs3GYT429syS_ff1ZEMOhVCDLJCe90VIhHwGdg4Mqu9_GIOy4IbDN6POGGOVKVbvyAK0EoVUfHVEFq_IB3Kc0kOGILcX5PYqPGFNd-mcNu3gxtBvKD75e9dvkEY3YvpBL2i9710XPN1gj9G1FB-n0IZ1DFNHXe_afQrpI3nfuDbhp5d8Qu6uft1d3hTL39e3lxfLwksFY-GrRipZCy0RStS1cR6ddoKvawfa8IZrpbhmqLDkiilu1uvc9MJVrEEjTsjpwXYbh8cJ02i7kDy2retxmJIVuoKSM5HBL_-AD8MU87DJgtEgKiZmt69vQhK0kEZJlSl5oHwcUorY2G0MnYt7C8zOJ7DPJ7Dzfq1R9vkEdpV1y4Mu4hb9qwjn5yPu7M4KV_L87XOAMTqnkEPl2M4lng2Bl8bej122-3mww7zeXcBokw_Ye6xDRD_aegj_GegvQYemAw</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Chin, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Miller, Preston J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North Holland Publishing Company, etc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</title><author>Chin, Daniel M. ; Miller, Preston J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Budgetary policy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dynamic general equilibrium</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Exchange rate policy</topic><topic>Exchange rate regimes</topic><topic>Exchange rates</topic><topic>Fixed exchange rates</topic><topic>Floating exchange rates</topic><topic>Foreign exchange rates</topic><topic>General economic equilibrium</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Policy co-ordination</topic><topic>Social planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Preston J.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin, Daniel M.</au><au>Miller, Preston J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</atitle><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1221</spage><epage>1249</epage><pages>1221-1249</pages><issn>0014-2921</issn><eissn>1873-572X</eissn><coden>EERVAI</coden><abstract>In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam, etc</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-2921 |
ispartof | European economic review, 1998-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1221-1249 |
issn | 0014-2921 1873-572X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38614203 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; RePEc; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Budgetary policy Comparative analysis Dynamic general equilibrium Dynamic models Equilibrium Exchange rate policy Exchange rate regimes Exchange rates Fixed exchange rates Floating exchange rates Foreign exchange rates General economic equilibrium Mathematical models Monetary policy Policy co-ordination Social planning Studies Voting behaviour |
title | Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fixed%20vs.%20floating%20exchange%20rates:%20A%20dynamic%20general%20equilibrium%20analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20economic%20review&rft.au=Chin,%20Daniel%20M.&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1221&rft.epage=1249&rft.pages=1221-1249&rft.issn=0014-2921&rft.eissn=1873-572X&rft.coden=EERVAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1518359757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518359757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S001429219700069X&rfr_iscdi=true |