Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis

In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maint...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European economic review 1998-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1221-1249
Hauptverfasser: Chin, Daniel M., Miller, Preston J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1249
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1221
container_title European economic review
container_volume 42
creator Chin, Daniel M.
Miller, Preston J.
description In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38614203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001429219700069X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1518359757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhk1JoZu0P6FgWgjNYVLLHo_tXkoIzQcs9NAc9ma8Hs3GYT429syS_ff1ZEMOhVCDLJCe90VIhHwGdg4Mqu9_GIOy4IbDN6POGGOVKVbvyAK0EoVUfHVEFq_IB3Kc0kOGILcX5PYqPGFNd-mcNu3gxtBvKD75e9dvkEY3YvpBL2i9710XPN1gj9G1FB-n0IZ1DFNHXe_afQrpI3nfuDbhp5d8Qu6uft1d3hTL39e3lxfLwksFY-GrRipZCy0RStS1cR6ddoKvawfa8IZrpbhmqLDkiilu1uvc9MJVrEEjTsjpwXYbh8cJ02i7kDy2retxmJIVuoKSM5HBL_-AD8MU87DJgtEgKiZmt69vQhK0kEZJlSl5oHwcUorY2G0MnYt7C8zOJ7DPJ7Dzfq1R9vkEdpV1y4Mu4hb9qwjn5yPu7M4KV_L87XOAMTqnkEPl2M4lng2Bl8bej122-3mww7zeXcBokw_Ye6xDRD_aegj_GegvQYemAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518359757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Chin, Daniel M. ; Miller, Preston J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daniel M. ; Miller, Preston J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-572X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EERVAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam, etc: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Budgetary policy ; Comparative analysis ; Dynamic general equilibrium ; Dynamic models ; Equilibrium ; Exchange rate policy ; Exchange rate regimes ; Exchange rates ; Fixed exchange rates ; Floating exchange rates ; Foreign exchange rates ; General economic equilibrium ; Mathematical models ; Monetary policy ; Policy co-ordination ; Social planning ; Studies ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>European economic review, 1998-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1221-1249</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,4007,27868,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeeecrev/v_3a42_3ay_3a1998_3ai_3a7_3ap_3a1221-1249.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Preston J.</creatorcontrib><title>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</title><title>European economic review</title><description>In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.</description><subject>Budgetary policy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dynamic general equilibrium</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Exchange rate policy</subject><subject>Exchange rate regimes</subject><subject>Exchange rates</subject><subject>Fixed exchange rates</subject><subject>Floating exchange rates</subject><subject>Foreign exchange rates</subject><subject>General economic equilibrium</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Policy co-ordination</subject><subject>Social planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>0014-2921</issn><issn>1873-572X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhk1JoZu0P6FgWgjNYVLLHo_tXkoIzQcs9NAc9ma8Hs3GYT429syS_ff1ZEMOhVCDLJCe90VIhHwGdg4Mqu9_GIOy4IbDN6POGGOVKVbvyAK0EoVUfHVEFq_IB3Kc0kOGILcX5PYqPGFNd-mcNu3gxtBvKD75e9dvkEY3YvpBL2i9710XPN1gj9G1FB-n0IZ1DFNHXe_afQrpI3nfuDbhp5d8Qu6uft1d3hTL39e3lxfLwksFY-GrRipZCy0RStS1cR6ddoKvawfa8IZrpbhmqLDkiilu1uvc9MJVrEEjTsjpwXYbh8cJ02i7kDy2retxmJIVuoKSM5HBL_-AD8MU87DJgtEgKiZmt69vQhK0kEZJlSl5oHwcUorY2G0MnYt7C8zOJ7DPJ7Dzfq1R9vkEdpV1y4Mu4hb9qwjn5yPu7M4KV_L87XOAMTqnkEPl2M4lng2Bl8bej122-3mww7zeXcBokw_Ye6xDRD_aegj_GegvQYemAw</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Chin, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Miller, Preston J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North Holland Publishing Company, etc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</title><author>Chin, Daniel M. ; Miller, Preston J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-c6f575d385e14e8d9acea8a32bda1892f2877280e7e4270729bb32bc3a60fe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Budgetary policy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dynamic general equilibrium</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Exchange rate policy</topic><topic>Exchange rate regimes</topic><topic>Exchange rates</topic><topic>Fixed exchange rates</topic><topic>Floating exchange rates</topic><topic>Foreign exchange rates</topic><topic>General economic equilibrium</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Policy co-ordination</topic><topic>Social planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Preston J.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin, Daniel M.</au><au>Miller, Preston J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis</atitle><jtitle>European economic review</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1221</spage><epage>1249</epage><pages>1221-1249</pages><issn>0014-2921</issn><eissn>1873-572X</eissn><coden>EERVAI</coden><abstract>In this study we contrast fixed and floating exchange rate regimes in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that the fundamental difference in the regimes is in the courses they imply for monetary policies. Because of policy coordination requirements, a tighter monetary policy needed to maintain a fixed exchange rate may necessitate a tightening in budget policy as well. We show that under some initial conditions voters or a social planner will favor one regime, but under other conditions they will favor the other. However, the choices of voters and a social planner are almost diametrically opposed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam, etc</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-2921
ispartof European economic review, 1998-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1221-1249
issn 0014-2921
1873-572X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38614203
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; RePEc; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Budgetary policy
Comparative analysis
Dynamic general equilibrium
Dynamic models
Equilibrium
Exchange rate policy
Exchange rate regimes
Exchange rates
Fixed exchange rates
Floating exchange rates
Foreign exchange rates
General economic equilibrium
Mathematical models
Monetary policy
Policy co-ordination
Social planning
Studies
Voting behaviour
title Fixed vs. floating exchange rates: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fixed%20vs.%20floating%20exchange%20rates:%20A%20dynamic%20general%20equilibrium%20analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20economic%20review&rft.au=Chin,%20Daniel%20M.&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1221&rft.epage=1249&rft.pages=1221-1249&rft.issn=0014-2921&rft.eissn=1873-572X&rft.coden=EERVAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00069-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1518359757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518359757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S001429219700069X&rfr_iscdi=true