A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the "Hapdong" Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea

The city of Seoul has devised a distinctive scheme of residential redevelopment, the Hapdong (partnership) Redevelopment. Its market-oriented approach differs from conventional public residential redevelopment and can be characterised as an owner-initiated gentrification process. However, the chroni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2003-10, Vol.40 (11), p.2223-2237
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Chang-Moo, Lee, Jong-Hyun, Yim, Chang-Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2237
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2223
container_title Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 40
creator Lee, Chang-Moo
Lee, Jong-Hyun
Yim, Chang-Ho
description The city of Seoul has devised a distinctive scheme of residential redevelopment, the Hapdong (partnership) Redevelopment. Its market-oriented approach differs from conventional public residential redevelopment and can be characterised as an owner-initiated gentrification process. However, the chronic problem of relocation in residential redevelopment has been aggravated rather than lessened. Also, considerable amounts of the project's profits have gone to outside investors rather than to residents, changing the old equity battles in urban renewal into a revenue-sharing game in the market system. Their financial vulnerability means that most residents lose the game in a relative sense. This paper analyses the behaviour of the owners in the framework of personal financing strategy rather than from an advocacy-planning point of view. The results indicate that the high degree of owners' relocation was inevitable following the introduction of the market-oriented scheme.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0042098032000123268
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38554849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43100485</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1080_0042098032000123268</sage_id><sourcerecordid>43100485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2145e9fca186cdda78309a0f25a18a3b4fa3583aeee31a0667f089a400630c5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx4NY6Kn9C4oQDvTJtZOfZn07Dq2lSku10Ldlmp2922NvcyZ7BR_6v5vjREHEpwyTz_eTCcPYZwGnAhx8AdASSgdKAoCQSlq3w0ZCWSjAqj-7bLQhig3yke2ltMiYlaUZsf8T_ov-Ub-mIs0xtv2M34SaOh6afJHamvqhxS7Xdca6sFrmBv8Zw4L8kM753Zz4FBNt-CHX4ytc1aGfjV8lbv2clsTbnt9SWHcn_HuIhAfsQ4Ndok9P5z77fXlxN70qrn98_TadXBdey3IopNCGysajcNbXNZ45BSVCI03uoPqrG1TGKSQiJRCsPWvAlajzJxV4Q2qfHW-9qxju15SGatkmT12HfZ4mVcoZo50uMzh-BS7COvZ5tkqqLBPWugypLeRjSClSU61iu8T4UAmoNvuo3thHTh09qTF57JqIvW_TS9SC0dbJzMGWSzijl-ffVx9uI4s0hPis1Epk2hn1COrjoCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236301668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the "Hapdong" Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lee, Chang-Moo ; Lee, Jong-Hyun ; Yim, Chang-Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Moo ; Lee, Jong-Hyun ; Yim, Chang-Ho</creatorcontrib><description>The city of Seoul has devised a distinctive scheme of residential redevelopment, the Hapdong (partnership) Redevelopment. Its market-oriented approach differs from conventional public residential redevelopment and can be characterised as an owner-initiated gentrification process. However, the chronic problem of relocation in residential redevelopment has been aggravated rather than lessened. Also, considerable amounts of the project's profits have gone to outside investors rather than to residents, changing the old equity battles in urban renewal into a revenue-sharing game in the market system. Their financial vulnerability means that most residents lose the game in a relative sense. This paper analyses the behaviour of the owners in the framework of personal financing strategy rather than from an advocacy-planning point of view. The results indicate that the high degree of owners' relocation was inevitable following the introduction of the market-oriented scheme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-063X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000123268</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URBSAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Carfax Publishing, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisition costs ; Asia ; Behavior ; Bgi / Prodig ; Cash ; Cities ; Equity ; Houses ; Housing ; Housing units ; Investors ; Light rail transportation ; Mongolia. Korea ; North Korea. South Korea ; Personal finance ; Present value ; Profit ; Redevelopment ; Relocation ; Residential areas ; Revenue sharing ; Seoul ; South Korea ; Urban development ; Urban renewal ; Urban studies</subject><ispartof>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2003-10, Vol.40 (11), p.2223-2237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 The Editors of Urban Studies</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Oct 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2145e9fca186cdda78309a0f25a18a3b4fa3583aeee31a0667f089a400630c5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2145e9fca186cdda78309a0f25a18a3b4fa3583aeee31a0667f089a400630c5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43100485$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43100485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16054682$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yim, Chang-Ho</creatorcontrib><title>A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the "Hapdong" Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea</title><title>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><description>The city of Seoul has devised a distinctive scheme of residential redevelopment, the Hapdong (partnership) Redevelopment. Its market-oriented approach differs from conventional public residential redevelopment and can be characterised as an owner-initiated gentrification process. However, the chronic problem of relocation in residential redevelopment has been aggravated rather than lessened. Also, considerable amounts of the project's profits have gone to outside investors rather than to residents, changing the old equity battles in urban renewal into a revenue-sharing game in the market system. Their financial vulnerability means that most residents lose the game in a relative sense. This paper analyses the behaviour of the owners in the framework of personal financing strategy rather than from an advocacy-planning point of view. The results indicate that the high degree of owners' relocation was inevitable following the introduction of the market-oriented scheme.</description><subject>Acquisition costs</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>Cash</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing units</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Light rail transportation</subject><subject>Mongolia. Korea</subject><subject>North Korea. South Korea</subject><subject>Personal finance</subject><subject>Present value</subject><subject>Profit</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Seoul</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban renewal</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><issn>0042-0980</issn><issn>1360-063X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx4NY6Kn9C4oQDvTJtZOfZn07Dq2lSku10Ldlmp2922NvcyZ7BR_6v5vjREHEpwyTz_eTCcPYZwGnAhx8AdASSgdKAoCQSlq3w0ZCWSjAqj-7bLQhig3yke2ltMiYlaUZsf8T_ov-Ub-mIs0xtv2M34SaOh6afJHamvqhxS7Xdca6sFrmBv8Zw4L8kM753Zz4FBNt-CHX4ytc1aGfjV8lbv2clsTbnt9SWHcn_HuIhAfsQ4Ndok9P5z77fXlxN70qrn98_TadXBdey3IopNCGysajcNbXNZ45BSVCI03uoPqrG1TGKSQiJRCsPWvAlajzJxV4Q2qfHW-9qxju15SGatkmT12HfZ4mVcoZo50uMzh-BS7COvZ5tkqqLBPWugypLeRjSClSU61iu8T4UAmoNvuo3thHTh09qTF57JqIvW_TS9SC0dbJzMGWSzijl-ffVx9uI4s0hPis1Epk2hn1COrjoCc</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Lee, Chang-Moo</creator><creator>Lee, Jong-Hyun</creator><creator>Yim, Chang-Ho</creator><general>Carfax Publishing, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Longman Group</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the "Hapdong" Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea</title><author>Lee, Chang-Moo ; Lee, Jong-Hyun ; Yim, Chang-Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2145e9fca186cdda78309a0f25a18a3b4fa3583aeee31a0667f089a400630c5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acquisition costs</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>Cash</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing units</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Light rail transportation</topic><topic>Mongolia. Korea</topic><topic>North Korea. South Korea</topic><topic>Personal finance</topic><topic>Present value</topic><topic>Profit</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Seoul</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban renewal</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yim, Chang-Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Chang-Moo</au><au>Lee, Jong-Hyun</au><au>Yim, Chang-Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the "Hapdong" Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea</atitle><jtitle>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2223</spage><epage>2237</epage><pages>2223-2237</pages><issn>0042-0980</issn><eissn>1360-063X</eissn><coden>URBSAQ</coden><abstract>The city of Seoul has devised a distinctive scheme of residential redevelopment, the Hapdong (partnership) Redevelopment. Its market-oriented approach differs from conventional public residential redevelopment and can be characterised as an owner-initiated gentrification process. However, the chronic problem of relocation in residential redevelopment has been aggravated rather than lessened. Also, considerable amounts of the project's profits have gone to outside investors rather than to residents, changing the old equity battles in urban renewal into a revenue-sharing game in the market system. Their financial vulnerability means that most residents lose the game in a relative sense. This paper analyses the behaviour of the owners in the framework of personal financing strategy rather than from an advocacy-planning point of view. The results indicate that the high degree of owners' relocation was inevitable following the introduction of the market-oriented scheme.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Carfax Publishing, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/0042098032000123268</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-0980
ispartof Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2003-10, Vol.40 (11), p.2223-2237
issn 0042-0980
1360-063X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38554849
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR
subjects Acquisition costs
Asia
Behavior
Bgi / Prodig
Cash
Cities
Equity
Houses
Housing
Housing units
Investors
Light rail transportation
Mongolia. Korea
North Korea. South Korea
Personal finance
Present value
Profit
Redevelopment
Relocation
Residential areas
Revenue sharing
Seoul
South Korea
Urban development
Urban renewal
Urban studies
title A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the "Hapdong" Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Revenue-sharing%20Model%20of%20Residential%20Redevelopment%20Projects:%20The%20Case%20of%20the%20%22Hapdong%22%20Redevelopment%20Scheme%20in%20Seoul,%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Urban%20studies%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Lee,%20Chang-Moo&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2223&rft.epage=2237&rft.pages=2223-2237&rft.issn=0042-0980&rft.eissn=1360-063X&rft.coden=URBSAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0042098032000123268&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43100485%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236301668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43100485&rft_sage_id=10.1080_0042098032000123268&rfr_iscdi=true