“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002
This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical perspectives on accounting 2003-08, Vol.14 (6), p.617-645 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 645 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 617 |
container_title | Critical perspectives on accounting |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Crompton, Gerald Jupe, Robert |
description | This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38517405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1045235402001879</els_id><sourcerecordid>38517405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9Kw0AQxoMoWKuPIOxJ9BDd3WQ3u14khtQEYluaVOlp2SQbiLRNzbaCt7yDJ0FfLk9i-ucuwzAz8JtvmM8wLhG8RRDRuxhBm5jYIvY1xDcQIuaY_MjoIciJyTkhx9v-gJwaZ1q_dRCyOe0Z47b5iadeAFwQh1E0A7EX-M9-2_zegyTwwXgSvrhJGHc5GoLRADxOwsQNh23zHYOJG0av7iwGiHPcNl8YQnxunBRyrtXFofaN6cBPvMCMRk-h50Zmhom1NqVkqUUsySjJKFKp00UhbZ7nzElhzpmk3Qg5tWRBU0Rx6kDGCmx3p4hS0OobV3vdVV29b5Rei0WpMzWfy6WqNlpYjCDHhqQDyR7M6krrWhViVZcLWX8KBMXWP7HzT2zNERCLnX-Cd3sP-z3VffFRqlrorFTLTOVlrbK1yKvyH4U_rORzzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38517405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Crompton, Gerald ; Jupe, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Gerald ; Jupe, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Conservative parties ; Customer service ; Economic efficiency ; Error ; Failure ; Government policy ; Ideology ; Privatization ; Railways ; Subsidies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 2003-08, Vol.14 (6), p.617-645</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jupe, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Conservative parties</subject><subject>Customer service</subject><subject>Economic efficiency</subject><subject>Error</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Railways</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9Kw0AQxoMoWKuPIOxJ9BDd3WQ3u14khtQEYluaVOlp2SQbiLRNzbaCt7yDJ0FfLk9i-ucuwzAz8JtvmM8wLhG8RRDRuxhBm5jYIvY1xDcQIuaY_MjoIciJyTkhx9v-gJwaZ1q_dRCyOe0Z47b5iadeAFwQh1E0A7EX-M9-2_zegyTwwXgSvrhJGHc5GoLRADxOwsQNh23zHYOJG0av7iwGiHPcNl8YQnxunBRyrtXFofaN6cBPvMCMRk-h50Zmhom1NqVkqUUsySjJKFKp00UhbZ7nzElhzpmk3Qg5tWRBU0Rx6kDGCmx3p4hS0OobV3vdVV29b5Rei0WpMzWfy6WqNlpYjCDHhqQDyR7M6krrWhViVZcLWX8KBMXWP7HzT2zNERCLnX-Cd3sP-z3VffFRqlrorFTLTOVlrbK1yKvyH4U_rORzzg</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Crompton, Gerald</creator><creator>Jupe, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</title><author>Crompton, Gerald ; Jupe, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Conservative parties</topic><topic>Customer service</topic><topic>Economic efficiency</topic><topic>Error</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Railways</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jupe, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crompton, Gerald</au><au>Jupe, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>617-645</pages><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-2354 |
ispartof | Critical perspectives on accounting, 2003-08, Vol.14 (6), p.617-645 |
issn | 1045-2354 1095-9955 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38517405 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Accounting Conservative parties Customer service Economic efficiency Error Failure Government policy Ideology Privatization Railways Subsidies United Kingdom |
title | “SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A39%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CSUCH%20A%20SILLY%20SCHEME%E2%80%9D:%20THE%20PRIVATISATION%20OF%20BRITAIN%E2%80%99S%20RAILWAYS%201992%E2%80%932002&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Crompton,%20Gerald&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=617-645&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38517405%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38517405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1045235402001879&rfr_iscdi=true |