“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002

This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical perspectives on accounting 2003-08, Vol.14 (6), p.617-645
Hauptverfasser: Crompton, Gerald, Jupe, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 645
container_issue 6
container_start_page 617
container_title Critical perspectives on accounting
container_volume 14
creator Crompton, Gerald
Jupe, Robert
description This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38517405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1045235402001879</els_id><sourcerecordid>38517405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9Kw0AQxoMoWKuPIOxJ9BDd3WQ3u14khtQEYluaVOlp2SQbiLRNzbaCt7yDJ0FfLk9i-ucuwzAz8JtvmM8wLhG8RRDRuxhBm5jYIvY1xDcQIuaY_MjoIciJyTkhx9v-gJwaZ1q_dRCyOe0Z47b5iadeAFwQh1E0A7EX-M9-2_zegyTwwXgSvrhJGHc5GoLRADxOwsQNh23zHYOJG0av7iwGiHPcNl8YQnxunBRyrtXFofaN6cBPvMCMRk-h50Zmhom1NqVkqUUsySjJKFKp00UhbZ7nzElhzpmk3Qg5tWRBU0Rx6kDGCmx3p4hS0OobV3vdVV29b5Rei0WpMzWfy6WqNlpYjCDHhqQDyR7M6krrWhViVZcLWX8KBMXWP7HzT2zNERCLnX-Cd3sP-z3VffFRqlrorFTLTOVlrbK1yKvyH4U_rORzzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38517405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Crompton, Gerald ; Jupe, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Gerald ; Jupe, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Conservative parties ; Customer service ; Economic efficiency ; Error ; Failure ; Government policy ; Ideology ; Privatization ; Railways ; Subsidies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 2003-08, Vol.14 (6), p.617-645</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jupe, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Conservative parties</subject><subject>Customer service</subject><subject>Economic efficiency</subject><subject>Error</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Railways</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9Kw0AQxoMoWKuPIOxJ9BDd3WQ3u14khtQEYluaVOlp2SQbiLRNzbaCt7yDJ0FfLk9i-ucuwzAz8JtvmM8wLhG8RRDRuxhBm5jYIvY1xDcQIuaY_MjoIciJyTkhx9v-gJwaZ1q_dRCyOe0Z47b5iadeAFwQh1E0A7EX-M9-2_zegyTwwXgSvrhJGHc5GoLRADxOwsQNh23zHYOJG0av7iwGiHPcNl8YQnxunBRyrtXFofaN6cBPvMCMRk-h50Zmhom1NqVkqUUsySjJKFKp00UhbZ7nzElhzpmk3Qg5tWRBU0Rx6kDGCmx3p4hS0OobV3vdVV29b5Rei0WpMzWfy6WqNlpYjCDHhqQDyR7M6krrWhViVZcLWX8KBMXWP7HzT2zNERCLnX-Cd3sP-z3VffFRqlrorFTLTOVlrbK1yKvyH4U_rORzzg</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Crompton, Gerald</creator><creator>Jupe, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</title><author>Crompton, Gerald ; Jupe, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-aa8b353a865c61eb7b7bfa49dd87b0d98a6fa40963af6b162b7088f241995ee03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Conservative parties</topic><topic>Customer service</topic><topic>Economic efficiency</topic><topic>Error</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Railways</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jupe, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crompton, Gerald</au><au>Jupe, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>617-645</pages><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>This paper analyses the privatisation of Britain’s railways, starting with the original legislation and ending with the insolvency of the infrastructure owner, Railtrack. It examines the performance of the privatised system, focusing on the three key benefits which the Major Government claimed for privatisation: greater efficiency; improved quality for consumers; reduction in public subsidy. It examines the performance of Railtrack, but also considers the behaviour of government, regulators and train operating companies. Attention is given to the importance of ideology in the privatisation, and to the broader role of privatisation in government policy. The paper argues that privatisation was fundamentally flawed, as it was impossible for the system to generate sufficient profits to deal with the demands upon it. Privatisation failed in all areas as it produced an inefficient system with higher costs, poorer quality of service, and increased public subsidy.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2354
ispartof Critical perspectives on accounting, 2003-08, Vol.14 (6), p.617-645
issn 1045-2354
1095-9955
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38517405
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Accounting
Conservative parties
Customer service
Economic efficiency
Error
Failure
Government policy
Ideology
Privatization
Railways
Subsidies
United Kingdom
title “SUCH A SILLY SCHEME”: THE PRIVATISATION OF BRITAIN’S RAILWAYS 1992–2002
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A39%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CSUCH%20A%20SILLY%20SCHEME%E2%80%9D:%20THE%20PRIVATISATION%20OF%20BRITAIN%E2%80%99S%20RAILWAYS%201992%E2%80%932002&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Crompton,%20Gerald&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=617-645&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00187-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38517405%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38517405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1045235402001879&rfr_iscdi=true