Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism"
Confucianism is often valued as a doctrine that highlights both the individual and social dimensions of the ideal person, for it indeed puts special emphasis on such lofty goals as loving all humanity and cultivating the self. Through a close and critical analysis of the texts of the Analects and th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophy east & west 2003-04, Vol.53 (2), p.234-250 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 250 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 234 |
container_title | Philosophy east & west |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Liu, Qingping |
description | Confucianism is often valued as a doctrine that highlights both the individual and social dimensions of the ideal person, for it indeed puts special emphasis on such lofty goals as loving all humanity and cultivating the self. Through a close and critical analysis of the texts of the Analects and the Mencius, however, it is attempted to demonstrate that because Confucius and Mencius always take filial piety, or, more generally, consanguineous affection, as not only the foundation but also the supreme principle of human life, the individual and social dimensions are inevitably subordinated to and substantially negated by the filial precisely within the Confucian framework, with the result that Confucianism in essence is neither collectivism nor individualism, but "consanguinitism." |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/pew.2003.0015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38494708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A101530199</galeid><jstor_id>1400091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A101530199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-7485c9421ea69e98114df12bcb2be82677b9cf8d046919f7a9fad28b81d4b0e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkGL1DAYhosoOK4evQmWERY8dMyXpG2yt3Vw14HFAUfPIU3TIUObjEm6uv9-U2dxHZmD5FB4ed584euTZa8BLYCU5MNe_1xghMgCISifZDMoMS-AcfY0m6UYCoYxPM9ehLBDCOEK1bPs65XpjexNvMtvtQ9jyDdOPQTStvnKtubWtOPv5CJf23zpbDcmxJow5DLk8xQEabejsSambP4ye9bJPuhXD9-z7PvVp2_Lz8XN-nq1vLwpVFnWsagpKxWnGLSsuOYMgLYd4EY1uNEMV3XdcNWxFtGKA-9qyTvZYtYwaGmDdEnOsvPDvXvvfow6RDGYoHTfS6vdGARhlNMasQTO_wF3bvQ2vU1gqFjNOSUJenuAtrLXovdqK8cQxCWkXRIEnCfi3V-EsZ2LXqpp5jG1OEGl0-rBKGd1Z1J-VHh_VEhM1L_iYfxq8-X_2Y_Xx2xxilWu7_VWi_QrluuTvPIuBK87sfdmkP5OABKTXyL5JSa_xORX4smfre60isMY9ONiKVCExWZScDIQEYwwJVPrzaG1C9H5xxE0GcmB3AM5jtXL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216879943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism"</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Liu, Qingping</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qingping</creatorcontrib><description>Confucianism is often valued as a doctrine that highlights both the individual and social dimensions of the ideal person, for it indeed puts special emphasis on such lofty goals as loving all humanity and cultivating the self. Through a close and critical analysis of the texts of the Analects and the Mencius, however, it is attempted to demonstrate that because Confucius and Mencius always take filial piety, or, more generally, consanguineous affection, as not only the foundation but also the supreme principle of human life, the individual and social dimensions are inevitably subordinated to and substantially negated by the filial precisely within the Confucian framework, with the result that Confucianism in essence is neither collectivism nor individualism, but "consanguinitism."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8221</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-1898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-1898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/pew.2003.0015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHEWAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press</publisher><subject>Affection ; Chinese studies ; Confucian ethics ; Confucianism ; Confucius ; Confucius (551-479 BC) ; Consanguinity ; Family ; Fathers ; Filial piety ; Humaneness ; Humanity ; Individuality ; Kinship ; Parents ; Philosophy ; Social aspects ; Sociality ; Society ; Sons ; The five bonds</subject><ispartof>Philosophy east & west, 2003-04, Vol.53 (2), p.234-250</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 University of Hawai'i Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2003 University of Hawai'i Press.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2003 University of Hawaii Press</rights><rights>Copyright University Press of Hawaii Apr 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-7485c9421ea69e98114df12bcb2be82677b9cf8d046919f7a9fad28b81d4b0e53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1400091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1400091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qingping</creatorcontrib><title>Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism"</title><title>Philosophy east & west</title><addtitle>Philosophy East and West</addtitle><description>Confucianism is often valued as a doctrine that highlights both the individual and social dimensions of the ideal person, for it indeed puts special emphasis on such lofty goals as loving all humanity and cultivating the self. Through a close and critical analysis of the texts of the Analects and the Mencius, however, it is attempted to demonstrate that because Confucius and Mencius always take filial piety, or, more generally, consanguineous affection, as not only the foundation but also the supreme principle of human life, the individual and social dimensions are inevitably subordinated to and substantially negated by the filial precisely within the Confucian framework, with the result that Confucianism in essence is neither collectivism nor individualism, but "consanguinitism."</description><subject>Affection</subject><subject>Chinese studies</subject><subject>Confucian ethics</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Confucius</subject><subject>Confucius (551-479 BC)</subject><subject>Consanguinity</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Fathers</subject><subject>Filial piety</subject><subject>Humaneness</subject><subject>Humanity</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Sociality</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sons</subject><subject>The five bonds</subject><issn>0031-8221</issn><issn>1529-1898</issn><issn>1529-1898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkGL1DAYhosoOK4evQmWERY8dMyXpG2yt3Vw14HFAUfPIU3TIUObjEm6uv9-U2dxHZmD5FB4ed584euTZa8BLYCU5MNe_1xghMgCISifZDMoMS-AcfY0m6UYCoYxPM9ehLBDCOEK1bPs65XpjexNvMtvtQ9jyDdOPQTStvnKtubWtOPv5CJf23zpbDcmxJow5DLk8xQEabejsSambP4ye9bJPuhXD9-z7PvVp2_Lz8XN-nq1vLwpVFnWsagpKxWnGLSsuOYMgLYd4EY1uNEMV3XdcNWxFtGKA-9qyTvZYtYwaGmDdEnOsvPDvXvvfow6RDGYoHTfS6vdGARhlNMasQTO_wF3bvQ2vU1gqFjNOSUJenuAtrLXovdqK8cQxCWkXRIEnCfi3V-EsZ2LXqpp5jG1OEGl0-rBKGd1Z1J-VHh_VEhM1L_iYfxq8-X_2Y_Xx2xxilWu7_VWi_QrluuTvPIuBK87sfdmkP5OABKTXyL5JSa_xORX4smfre60isMY9ONiKVCExWZScDIQEYwwJVPrzaG1C9H5xxE0GcmB3AM5jtXL</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Liu, Qingping</creator><general>University of Hawaii Press</general><general>University of Hawai'i Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism"</title><author>Liu, Qingping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-7485c9421ea69e98114df12bcb2be82677b9cf8d046919f7a9fad28b81d4b0e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Affection</topic><topic>Chinese studies</topic><topic>Confucian ethics</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Confucius</topic><topic>Confucius (551-479 BC)</topic><topic>Consanguinity</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Fathers</topic><topic>Filial piety</topic><topic>Humaneness</topic><topic>Humanity</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Sociality</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sons</topic><topic>The five bonds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qingping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philosophy east & west</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Qingping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism"</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy east & west</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophy East and West</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>234</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>234-250</pages><issn>0031-8221</issn><issn>1529-1898</issn><eissn>1529-1898</eissn><coden>PHEWAU</coden><abstract>Confucianism is often valued as a doctrine that highlights both the individual and social dimensions of the ideal person, for it indeed puts special emphasis on such lofty goals as loving all humanity and cultivating the self. Through a close and critical analysis of the texts of the Analects and the Mencius, however, it is attempted to demonstrate that because Confucius and Mencius always take filial piety, or, more generally, consanguineous affection, as not only the foundation but also the supreme principle of human life, the individual and social dimensions are inevitably subordinated to and substantially negated by the filial precisely within the Confucian framework, with the result that Confucianism in essence is neither collectivism nor individualism, but "consanguinitism."</abstract><cop>Honolulu</cop><pub>University of Hawaii Press</pub><doi>10.1353/pew.2003.0015</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-8221 |
ispartof | Philosophy east & west, 2003-04, Vol.53 (2), p.234-250 |
issn | 0031-8221 1529-1898 1529-1898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38494708 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Affection Chinese studies Confucian ethics Confucianism Confucius Confucius (551-479 BC) Consanguinity Family Fathers Filial piety Humaneness Humanity Individuality Kinship Parents Philosophy Social aspects Sociality Society Sons The five bonds |
title | Filiality versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism" |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Filiality%20versus%20Sociality%20and%20Individuality:%20On%20Confucianism%20as%20%22Consanguinitism%22&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20east%20&%20west&rft.au=Liu,%20Qingping&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=234&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=234-250&rft.issn=0031-8221&rft.eissn=1529-1898&rft.coden=PHEWAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/pew.2003.0015&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA101530199%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216879943&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A101530199&rft_jstor_id=1400091&rfr_iscdi=true |