Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents
How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International labour review 2002-12, Vol.141 (4), p.385-411 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 411 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 385 |
| container_title | International labour review |
| container_volume | 141 |
| creator | LEVISON, Deborah RITTER, Joseph A. STOCK, Rosamund ANKER, Richard |
| description | How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional principles of need, equality and equity. In particular, they investigate the preferences of different demographic groups and empirically verify the previously observed pattern of consensus on need as a distributional principle combined with dissensus on the acceptability of inequality. They also examine whether people of lower socio-economic status favor distributional rules that would mitigate their position, including support for positive discrimination in labour markets. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00246.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38474158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38474158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-b367d3b2b35f1d940078705be0e038de4342faa8c7acf239e6fa1d010331d6593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcFrHCEYxaU00G3S_0Fy6G0mOuo4m0MgpEkasmygtKTs5cOZ0eJ0R7fqpJv_vg4bcugtHhQ-33s-fiJ0SklJ8zobSipqXiwp-1lWhFRlavPO63L_Di1er96jRZ6SQsqGfEAfYxwIIayhYoEev9iYgm2nZL3D3mDrOj9qrFyPB99iv9v5kCZnk9XxHK99GFWyTxoPU_9Lj9qliE3wIzZ-CrjzLlk3D0_QkVHbqD-9nMfox83196uvxerh9u7qclV0nDSiaFkte9ZWLROG9ktOiGwkEa0mOhfsNWe8Mko1nVSdqdhS10bRnlDCGO1rsWTH6PMhdxf8n0nHBKONnd5uldN-isAaLjkVTRae_icccmOXu0FV5XeJkDyLzg-iLvgYgzawC3ZU4RkogRk4DDBThZkqzMDhBTjss_niYP5rt_r5DU64W31jjcgBxSEgf4nevwao8BtqyaSAx_UtbO7vNxt5s4I1-wfBeJiZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224000574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LEVISON, Deborah ; RITTER, Joseph A. ; STOCK, Rosamund ; ANKER, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>LEVISON, Deborah ; RITTER, Joseph A. ; STOCK, Rosamund ; ANKER, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional principles of need, equality and equity. In particular, they investigate the preferences of different demographic groups and empirically verify the previously observed pattern of consensus on need as a distributional principle combined with dissensus on the acceptability of inequality. They also examine whether people of lower socio-economic status favor distributional rules that would mitigate their position, including support for positive discrimination in labour markets. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1564-913X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00246.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Demographics ; Discrimination ; Distributive justice ; Economic security ; Economic Status ; Employment Opportunities ; Equality ; Income distribution ; Individual Characteristics ; Industrial relations ; Inequality ; Labor market ; Labour force ; Manycountries ; Polls & surveys ; Principles ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Social justice ; Social Psychology ; Social security ; Spreadsheets ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International labour review, 2002-12, Vol.141 (4), p.385-411</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Labour Office 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-b367d3b2b35f1d940078705be0e038de4342faa8c7acf239e6fa1d010331d6593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1564-913X.2002.tb00246.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1564-913X.2002.tb00246.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,12846,27866,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LEVISON, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RITTER, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOCK, Rosamund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANKER, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents</title><title>International labour review</title><description>How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional principles of need, equality and equity. In particular, they investigate the preferences of different demographic groups and empirically verify the previously observed pattern of consensus on need as a distributional principle combined with dissensus on the acceptability of inequality. They also examine whether people of lower socio-economic status favor distributional rules that would mitigate their position, including support for positive discrimination in labour markets. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Economic security</subject><subject>Economic Status</subject><subject>Employment Opportunities</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Industrial relations</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labour force</subject><subject>Manycountries</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Spreadsheets</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0020-7780</issn><issn>1564-913X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkcFrHCEYxaU00G3S_0Fy6G0mOuo4m0MgpEkasmygtKTs5cOZ0eJ0R7fqpJv_vg4bcugtHhQ-33s-fiJ0SklJ8zobSipqXiwp-1lWhFRlavPO63L_Di1er96jRZ6SQsqGfEAfYxwIIayhYoEev9iYgm2nZL3D3mDrOj9qrFyPB99iv9v5kCZnk9XxHK99GFWyTxoPU_9Lj9qliE3wIzZ-CrjzLlk3D0_QkVHbqD-9nMfox83196uvxerh9u7qclV0nDSiaFkte9ZWLROG9ktOiGwkEa0mOhfsNWe8Mko1nVSdqdhS10bRnlDCGO1rsWTH6PMhdxf8n0nHBKONnd5uldN-isAaLjkVTRae_icccmOXu0FV5XeJkDyLzg-iLvgYgzawC3ZU4RkogRk4DDBThZkqzMDhBTjss_niYP5rt_r5DU64W31jjcgBxSEgf4nevwao8BtqyaSAx_UtbO7vNxt5s4I1-wfBeJiZ</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>LEVISON, Deborah</creator><creator>RITTER, Joseph A.</creator><creator>STOCK, Rosamund</creator><creator>ANKER, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>International Labour Organization, represented by the International Labour Office (ILO)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents</title><author>LEVISON, Deborah ; RITTER, Joseph A. ; STOCK, Rosamund ; ANKER, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4085-b367d3b2b35f1d940078705be0e038de4342faa8c7acf239e6fa1d010331d6593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Economic security</topic><topic>Economic Status</topic><topic>Employment Opportunities</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Industrial relations</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labour force</topic><topic>Manycountries</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Spreadsheets</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LEVISON, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RITTER, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOCK, Rosamund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANKER, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>International labour review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LEVISON, Deborah</au><au>RITTER, Joseph A.</au><au>STOCK, Rosamund</au><au>ANKER, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents</atitle><jtitle>International labour review</jtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>385-411</pages><issn>0020-7780</issn><eissn>1564-913X</eissn><abstract>How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional principles of need, equality and equity. In particular, they investigate the preferences of different demographic groups and empirically verify the previously observed pattern of consensus on need as a distributional principle combined with dissensus on the acceptability of inequality. They also examine whether people of lower socio-economic status favor distributional rules that would mitigate their position, including support for positive discrimination in labour markets. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00246.x</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7780 |
| ispartof | International labour review, 2002-12, Vol.141 (4), p.385-411 |
| issn | 0020-7780 1564-913X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38474158 |
| source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Comparative analysis Demographics Discrimination Distributive justice Economic security Economic Status Employment Opportunities Equality Income distribution Individual Characteristics Industrial relations Inequality Labor market Labour force Manycountries Polls & surveys Principles Resistance (Psychology) Social justice Social Psychology Social security Spreadsheets Studies |
| title | Distribution of income and job opportunities: Normative judgements from four continents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A32%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20income%20and%20job%20opportunities:%20Normative%20judgements%20from%20four%20continents&rft.jtitle=International%20labour%20review&rft.au=LEVISON,%20Deborah&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=385-411&rft.issn=0020-7780&rft.eissn=1564-913X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2002.tb00246.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38474158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224000574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |