Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages
Researchers examining ‘flaming’ - defined as hostile and aggressive interactions via text-based computer mediated-communication - have proposed theoretical frameworks to explain possible causes. However, precise conceptual and operational definitions of ‘flaming’ have yet to be established, which ha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New media & society 2003-03, Vol.5 (1), p.69-94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 94 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | New media & society |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | O’Sullivan, Patrick B. Flanagin, Andrew J. |
description | Researchers examining ‘flaming’ - defined as hostile and aggressive interactions via text-based computer mediated-communication - have proposed theoretical frameworks to explain possible causes. However, precise conceptual and operational definitions of ‘flaming’ have yet to be established, which has implications for understanding this phenomenon. Consequently, we propose an interactional- normative framework that focuses on interpretations of messages from multiple perspectives in the situated and evolving context of appropriateness norms. This framework incorporates intentionality and individuals’ strategic choices in language use and channel selection. We discuss the implications of this framework for research on flaming and other problematic interactions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1461444803005001908 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38439506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444803005001908</sage_id><sourcerecordid>38439506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8e61aa621fc4e674bd49ac9f54b7c1859ef16031ace74a49a081eae92cf085ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1KA0EQhRtRMEZP4GZW7ka70_8bQYJGISCIrptKpzpOmJ_YPbPQVY6h18tJnCFZiqsqqr5X1HuEXDJ6zZjWN0woJoQwlFMqKWWWmiMyGqa55kweH_oBOSVnKa17RgltR-T2BX1Te9y0HZTFV1Gvst32O5RQ9e1u-5NBvcya9h1jtonNosQK2sJnFaYEK0zn5CRAmfDiUMfk7eH-dfqYz59nT9O7ee65kW1uUDEANWHBC1RaLJbCgrdBioX2zEiLgSnKGXjUAvodNQwB7cQHaiQgH5Or_d3-iY8OU-uqInksS6ix6ZLjRnArqepBvgd9bFKKGNwmFhXET8eoG7Jyf2TVq-heNZhy66aLde_mX8kvZKVr_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38439506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>O’Sullivan, Patrick B. ; Flanagin, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Patrick B. ; Flanagin, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers examining ‘flaming’ - defined as hostile and aggressive interactions via text-based computer mediated-communication - have proposed theoretical frameworks to explain possible causes. However, precise conceptual and operational definitions of ‘flaming’ have yet to be established, which has implications for understanding this phenomenon. Consequently, we propose an interactional- normative framework that focuses on interpretations of messages from multiple perspectives in the situated and evolving context of appropriateness norms. This framework incorporates intentionality and individuals’ strategic choices in language use and channel selection. We discuss the implications of this framework for research on flaming and other problematic interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444803005001908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Communications technology ; Computers ; Media studies</subject><ispartof>New media & society, 2003-03, Vol.5 (1), p.69-94</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8e61aa621fc4e674bd49ac9f54b7c1859ef16031ace74a49a081eae92cf085ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8e61aa621fc4e674bd49ac9f54b7c1859ef16031ace74a49a081eae92cf085ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444803005001908$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444803005001908$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Patrick B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagin, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages</title><title>New media & society</title><description>Researchers examining ‘flaming’ - defined as hostile and aggressive interactions via text-based computer mediated-communication - have proposed theoretical frameworks to explain possible causes. However, precise conceptual and operational definitions of ‘flaming’ have yet to be established, which has implications for understanding this phenomenon. Consequently, we propose an interactional- normative framework that focuses on interpretations of messages from multiple perspectives in the situated and evolving context of appropriateness norms. This framework incorporates intentionality and individuals’ strategic choices in language use and channel selection. We discuss the implications of this framework for research on flaming and other problematic interactions.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Media studies</subject><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1KA0EQhRtRMEZP4GZW7ka70_8bQYJGISCIrptKpzpOmJ_YPbPQVY6h18tJnCFZiqsqqr5X1HuEXDJ6zZjWN0woJoQwlFMqKWWWmiMyGqa55kweH_oBOSVnKa17RgltR-T2BX1Te9y0HZTFV1Gvst32O5RQ9e1u-5NBvcya9h1jtonNosQK2sJnFaYEK0zn5CRAmfDiUMfk7eH-dfqYz59nT9O7ee65kW1uUDEANWHBC1RaLJbCgrdBioX2zEiLgSnKGXjUAvodNQwB7cQHaiQgH5Or_d3-iY8OU-uqInksS6ix6ZLjRnArqepBvgd9bFKKGNwmFhXET8eoG7Jyf2TVq-heNZhy66aLde_mX8kvZKVr_w</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>O’Sullivan, Patrick B.</creator><creator>Flanagin, Andrew J.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages</title><author>O’Sullivan, Patrick B. ; Flanagin, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8e61aa621fc4e674bd49ac9f54b7c1859ef16031ace74a49a081eae92cf085ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Media studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Patrick B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagin, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Sullivan, Patrick B.</au><au>Flanagin, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages</atitle><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>69-94</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>Researchers examining ‘flaming’ - defined as hostile and aggressive interactions via text-based computer mediated-communication - have proposed theoretical frameworks to explain possible causes. However, precise conceptual and operational definitions of ‘flaming’ have yet to be established, which has implications for understanding this phenomenon. Consequently, we propose an interactional- normative framework that focuses on interpretations of messages from multiple perspectives in the situated and evolving context of appropriateness norms. This framework incorporates intentionality and individuals’ strategic choices in language use and channel selection. We discuss the implications of this framework for research on flaming and other problematic interactions.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461444803005001908</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-4448 |
ispartof | New media & society, 2003-03, Vol.5 (1), p.69-94 |
issn | 1461-4448 1461-7315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38439506 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Communication Communications technology Computers Media studies |
title | Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A23%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconceptualizing%20%E2%80%98flaming%E2%80%99%20and%20other%20problematic%20messages&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Sullivan,%20Patrick%20B.&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=69-94&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444803005001908&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38439506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38439506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444803005001908&rfr_iscdi=true |