Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives
The corporate approach to environmental protection has been evolving from a regulation-driven reactive mode to a more proactive approach involving voluntarily adopted management systems that integrate environmental concerns with traditional managerial functions. Several hypotheses about the factors...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Land economics 2002-11, Vol.78 (4), p.539-558 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 558 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 539 |
| container_title | Land economics |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Khanna, Madhu William Rose Q. Anton |
| description | The corporate approach to environmental protection has been evolving from a regulation-driven reactive mode to a more proactive approach involving voluntarily adopted management systems that integrate environmental concerns with traditional managerial functions. Several hypotheses about the factors explaining the diversity in the environmental management systems adopted by firms are tested using survey data for a sample of S&P 500 firms. The analysis shows that the threat of environmental liabilities, high costs of compliance, market pressures, and public pressures on firms with high on-site toxic emissions per unit output create incentives for adopting a more comprehensive environmental management system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3146852 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38418461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3146852</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3146852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9914c5034ffd41f704cac4953202a0ff3dbd0e63fdf5cc9c9b9139ee353cb1b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFLwzAUwPEgCs4pfoUioqdq0pemizcdUycTQfRc0vRldHbJTNrBvr0Z20kQcwkhPx68PyHnjN5kQItbYFyM8uyADFjOIR1Blh-SAaUZpIUAeUxOQljQeApRDMjL2PmV86rDZGLXjXd2ibZTbfKqrJrj9nGXvOO8b1Xn_CZRto5f_gu79EEFrJOp1dE0awyn5MioNuDZ_h6Sz8fJx_g5nb09Tcf3s1RzIbtUSsZ1ToEbU3NmCsq10lzmkNFMUWOgrmqKAkxtcq2llpVkIBEhB12xqoAhudrNXXn33WPoymUTNLatsuj6UMKIsxEX7F8YQ_FtrAgvfsGF672NS5QZFQUwKiCi6x3S3oXg0ZQr3yyV35SMltvy5b58lJc7uQix2Z_sB35Sf9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206731063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Khanna, Madhu ; William Rose Q. Anton</creator><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Madhu ; William Rose Q. Anton</creatorcontrib><description>The corporate approach to environmental protection has been evolving from a regulation-driven reactive mode to a more proactive approach involving voluntarily adopted management systems that integrate environmental concerns with traditional managerial functions. Several hypotheses about the factors explaining the diversity in the environmental management systems adopted by firms are tested using survey data for a sample of S&P 500 firms. The analysis shows that the threat of environmental liabilities, high costs of compliance, market pressures, and public pressures on firms with high on-site toxic emissions per unit output create incentives for adopting a more comprehensive environmental management system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-7639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-8325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3146852</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LAECAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: University of Wisconsin Press</publisher><subject>Business structures ; Compliance costs ; Corporate planning ; Economic regulation ; Economics ; Emissions regulations ; Enterprises ; Environment ; Environmental management ; Environmental management systems ; Environmental protection ; Environmental regulation ; Green businesses ; Green economics ; Land economics ; Market ; Polls & surveys ; Pollution control ; Regulation ; Studies ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Land economics, 2002-11, Vol.78 (4), p.539-558</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System</rights><rights>Copyright University of Wisconsin Press Nov 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9914c5034ffd41f704cac4953202a0ff3dbd0e63fdf5cc9c9b9139ee353cb1b73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3146852$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3146852$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Madhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>William Rose Q. Anton</creatorcontrib><title>Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives</title><title>Land economics</title><description>The corporate approach to environmental protection has been evolving from a regulation-driven reactive mode to a more proactive approach involving voluntarily adopted management systems that integrate environmental concerns with traditional managerial functions. Several hypotheses about the factors explaining the diversity in the environmental management systems adopted by firms are tested using survey data for a sample of S&P 500 firms. The analysis shows that the threat of environmental liabilities, high costs of compliance, market pressures, and public pressures on firms with high on-site toxic emissions per unit output create incentives for adopting a more comprehensive environmental management system.</description><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Compliance costs</subject><subject>Corporate planning</subject><subject>Economic regulation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Emissions regulations</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental management systems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental regulation</subject><subject>Green businesses</subject><subject>Green economics</subject><subject>Land economics</subject><subject>Market</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0023-7639</issn><issn>1543-8325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0EFLwzAUwPEgCs4pfoUioqdq0pemizcdUycTQfRc0vRldHbJTNrBvr0Z20kQcwkhPx68PyHnjN5kQItbYFyM8uyADFjOIR1Blh-SAaUZpIUAeUxOQljQeApRDMjL2PmV86rDZGLXjXd2ibZTbfKqrJrj9nGXvOO8b1Xn_CZRto5f_gu79EEFrJOp1dE0awyn5MioNuDZ_h6Sz8fJx_g5nb09Tcf3s1RzIbtUSsZ1ToEbU3NmCsq10lzmkNFMUWOgrmqKAkxtcq2llpVkIBEhB12xqoAhudrNXXn33WPoymUTNLatsuj6UMKIsxEX7F8YQ_FtrAgvfsGF672NS5QZFQUwKiCi6x3S3oXg0ZQr3yyV35SMltvy5b58lJc7uQix2Z_sB35Sf9s</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Khanna, Madhu</creator><creator>William Rose Q. Anton</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives</title><author>Khanna, Madhu ; William Rose Q. Anton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9914c5034ffd41f704cac4953202a0ff3dbd0e63fdf5cc9c9b9139ee353cb1b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Compliance costs</topic><topic>Corporate planning</topic><topic>Economic regulation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Emissions regulations</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental management systems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental regulation</topic><topic>Green businesses</topic><topic>Green economics</topic><topic>Land economics</topic><topic>Market</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khanna, Madhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>William Rose Q. Anton</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khanna, Madhu</au><au>William Rose Q. Anton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives</atitle><jtitle>Land economics</jtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>539-558</pages><issn>0023-7639</issn><eissn>1543-8325</eissn><coden>LAECAD</coden><abstract>The corporate approach to environmental protection has been evolving from a regulation-driven reactive mode to a more proactive approach involving voluntarily adopted management systems that integrate environmental concerns with traditional managerial functions. Several hypotheses about the factors explaining the diversity in the environmental management systems adopted by firms are tested using survey data for a sample of S&P 500 firms. The analysis shows that the threat of environmental liabilities, high costs of compliance, market pressures, and public pressures on firms with high on-site toxic emissions per unit output create incentives for adopting a more comprehensive environmental management system.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Press</pub><doi>10.2307/3146852</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-7639 |
| ispartof | Land economics, 2002-11, Vol.78 (4), p.539-558 |
| issn | 0023-7639 1543-8325 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38418461 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Business structures Compliance costs Corporate planning Economic regulation Economics Emissions regulations Enterprises Environment Environmental management Environmental management systems Environmental protection Environmental regulation Green businesses Green economics Land economics Market Polls & surveys Pollution control Regulation Studies U.S.A |
| title | Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T12%3A59%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corporate%20Environmental%20Management:%20Regulatory%20and%20Market-Based%20Incentives&rft.jtitle=Land%20economics&rft.au=Khanna,%20Madhu&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=539-558&rft.issn=0023-7639&rft.eissn=1543-8325&rft.coden=LAECAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3146852&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3146852%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206731063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3146852&rfr_iscdi=true |