Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups
According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental social psychology 2002-11, Vol.38 (6), p.586-602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 602 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 586 |
container_title | Journal of experimental social psychology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Jost, John T Pelham, Brett W Carvallo, Mauricio R |
description | According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit
outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38408673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002210310200505X</els_id><sourcerecordid>38408673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFTEQhoMoeKz-BCEIil5sO_nY7K43RYofhVIvVOhdyGYnPTnsbtYkW-i_N-ecouBNr4bAM-_MPCHkNYNTBkyd_QDgvGIg2HvgHwBqqKubJ2TDoFMVSFU_JZu_yHPyIqUdAHTA2Yb46zBXNszJ-rAm6kKcEg2OpvuUcaK7NWXvvDXZh_kjvZyW0VufqZkH2uPW3PkQzUiXiA4jzhYPEXTrb7cYacoml9DbGNYlvSTPnBkTvnqoJ-TXl88_L75VV9-_Xl58uqqslE2umsZyhaYVqhfDoGxvG2uxE1CevZSubYXrlOPOtQwZFLoxvepwqJlhnW3ECXl3zF1i-L1iynryyeI4mhnLiVq0ElrViAK--Q_chTXOZTfNmWxBguwKVB8hG0NK5Uy9RD-ZeK8Z6L19fbCv92o1cH2wr29K39uHcJOsGV00s_XpX7OUXLRqv8T5kcOi5M5j1OUn9iIHH9FmPQT_yKQ_2RWbDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214804049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jost, John T ; Pelham, Brett W ; Carvallo, Mauricio R</creator><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T ; Pelham, Brett W ; Carvallo, Mauricio R</creatorcontrib><description>According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit
outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Human behaviour ; In-group ; Out-groups ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Self ; Self-esteem ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Social research</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2002-11, Vol.38 (6), p.586-602</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Nov 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210310200505X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14423863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelham, Brett W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvallo, Mauricio R</creatorcontrib><title>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit
outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>In-group</subject><subject>Out-groups</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self-esteem</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1rFTEQhoMoeKz-BCEIil5sO_nY7K43RYofhVIvVOhdyGYnPTnsbtYkW-i_N-ecouBNr4bAM-_MPCHkNYNTBkyd_QDgvGIg2HvgHwBqqKubJ2TDoFMVSFU_JZu_yHPyIqUdAHTA2Yb46zBXNszJ-rAm6kKcEg2OpvuUcaK7NWXvvDXZh_kjvZyW0VufqZkH2uPW3PkQzUiXiA4jzhYPEXTrb7cYacoml9DbGNYlvSTPnBkTvnqoJ-TXl88_L75VV9-_Xl58uqqslE2umsZyhaYVqhfDoGxvG2uxE1CevZSubYXrlOPOtQwZFLoxvepwqJlhnW3ECXl3zF1i-L1iynryyeI4mhnLiVq0ElrViAK--Q_chTXOZTfNmWxBguwKVB8hG0NK5Uy9RD-ZeK8Z6L19fbCv92o1cH2wr29K39uHcJOsGV00s_XpX7OUXLRqv8T5kcOi5M5j1OUn9iIHH9FmPQT_yKQ_2RWbDQ</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Jost, John T</creator><creator>Pelham, Brett W</creator><creator>Carvallo, Mauricio R</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</title><author>Jost, John T ; Pelham, Brett W ; Carvallo, Mauricio R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>In-group</topic><topic>Out-groups</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self-esteem</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelham, Brett W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvallo, Mauricio R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jost, John T</au><au>Pelham, Brett W</au><au>Carvallo, Mauricio R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>602</epage><pages>586-602</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit
outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1031 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental social psychology, 2002-11, Vol.38 (6), p.586-602 |
issn | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38408673 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Behavior Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Group dynamics Human behaviour In-group Out-groups Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Self Self-esteem Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology Social research |
title | Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-conscious%20forms%20of%20system%20justification:%20Implicit%20and%20behavioral%20preferences%20for%20higher%20status%20groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Jost,%20John%20T&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=602&rft.pages=586-602&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38408673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214804049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S002210310200505X&rfr_iscdi=true |