Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups

According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental social psychology 2002-11, Vol.38 (6), p.586-602
Hauptverfasser: Jost, John T, Pelham, Brett W, Carvallo, Mauricio R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 602
container_issue 6
container_start_page 586
container_title Journal of experimental social psychology
container_volume 38
creator Jost, John T
Pelham, Brett W
Carvallo, Mauricio R
description According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38408673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002210310200505X</els_id><sourcerecordid>38408673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFTEQhoMoeKz-BCEIil5sO_nY7K43RYofhVIvVOhdyGYnPTnsbtYkW-i_N-ecouBNr4bAM-_MPCHkNYNTBkyd_QDgvGIg2HvgHwBqqKubJ2TDoFMVSFU_JZu_yHPyIqUdAHTA2Yb46zBXNszJ-rAm6kKcEg2OpvuUcaK7NWXvvDXZh_kjvZyW0VufqZkH2uPW3PkQzUiXiA4jzhYPEXTrb7cYacoml9DbGNYlvSTPnBkTvnqoJ-TXl88_L75VV9-_Xl58uqqslE2umsZyhaYVqhfDoGxvG2uxE1CevZSubYXrlOPOtQwZFLoxvepwqJlhnW3ECXl3zF1i-L1iynryyeI4mhnLiVq0ElrViAK--Q_chTXOZTfNmWxBguwKVB8hG0NK5Uy9RD-ZeK8Z6L19fbCv92o1cH2wr29K39uHcJOsGV00s_XpX7OUXLRqv8T5kcOi5M5j1OUn9iIHH9FmPQT_yKQ_2RWbDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214804049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jost, John T ; Pelham, Brett W ; Carvallo, Mauricio R</creator><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T ; Pelham, Brett W ; Carvallo, Mauricio R</creatorcontrib><description>According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Human behaviour ; In-group ; Out-groups ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Self ; Self-esteem ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Social research</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2002-11, Vol.38 (6), p.586-602</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Nov 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002210310200505X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14423863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelham, Brett W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvallo, Mauricio R</creatorcontrib><title>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><description>According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>In-group</subject><subject>Out-groups</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Self</subject><subject>Self-esteem</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV1rFTEQhoMoeKz-BCEIil5sO_nY7K43RYofhVIvVOhdyGYnPTnsbtYkW-i_N-ecouBNr4bAM-_MPCHkNYNTBkyd_QDgvGIg2HvgHwBqqKubJ2TDoFMVSFU_JZu_yHPyIqUdAHTA2Yb46zBXNszJ-rAm6kKcEg2OpvuUcaK7NWXvvDXZh_kjvZyW0VufqZkH2uPW3PkQzUiXiA4jzhYPEXTrb7cYacoml9DbGNYlvSTPnBkTvnqoJ-TXl88_L75VV9-_Xl58uqqslE2umsZyhaYVqhfDoGxvG2uxE1CevZSubYXrlOPOtQwZFLoxvepwqJlhnW3ECXl3zF1i-L1iynryyeI4mhnLiVq0ElrViAK--Q_chTXOZTfNmWxBguwKVB8hG0NK5Uy9RD-ZeK8Z6L19fbCv92o1cH2wr29K39uHcJOsGV00s_XpX7OUXLRqv8T5kcOi5M5j1OUn9iIHH9FmPQT_yKQ_2RWbDQ</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Jost, John T</creator><creator>Pelham, Brett W</creator><creator>Carvallo, Mauricio R</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</title><author>Jost, John T ; Pelham, Brett W ; Carvallo, Mauricio R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-77c26ea836b3dd6cbc7cce930b3db44f883f96f2ff81e107c27ab69ed51a19c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>In-group</topic><topic>Out-groups</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Self</topic><topic>Self-esteem</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jost, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelham, Brett W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvallo, Mauricio R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jost, John T</au><au>Pelham, Brett W</au><au>Carvallo, Mauricio R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>602</epage><pages>586-602</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>According to system justification theory, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, even though it sometimes means harboring preferences for members of higher status outgroups. In Study 1, students from a high status (but not a low status) university exhibited significant ingroup favoritism on the IAT, an automatic evaluative measure. Furthermore, for students at the high status university, implicit ingroup bias was positively correlated with implicit self-esteem. For students at the low status university, implicit acceptance of consensual stereotypes concerning academic and extracurricular characteristics was associated with implicit outgroup favoritism. In Study 2, Latinos and Asian Americans exhibited significant outgroup favoritism on an unobtrusive behavioral measure by choosing White interaction partners over members of their own groups. In Study 3, parents named newborn children disproportionately after their fathers (compared with their mothers) and published birth announcements for boys slightly more often than for girls. Thus, we observed evidence of system justification on implicit or unobtrusive measures in three different socially disadvantaged groups.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1031
ispartof Journal of experimental social psychology, 2002-11, Vol.38 (6), p.586-602
issn 0022-1031
1096-0465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38408673
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Group dynamics
Human behaviour
In-group
Out-groups
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Self
Self-esteem
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social psychology
Social research
title Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-conscious%20forms%20of%20system%20justification:%20Implicit%20and%20behavioral%20preferences%20for%20higher%20status%20groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Jost,%20John%20T&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=602&rft.pages=586-602&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38408673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214804049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S002210310200505X&rfr_iscdi=true