Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”
This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that busi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2002-12, Vol.30 (15), p.1357-1361 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1361 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 1357 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Haar, Lawrence Stanciu, Laura N |
description | This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to
Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38399919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421502000782</els_id><sourcerecordid>38399919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN2K1TAUhYsoOI4-ghAERS-qO0nTtN6IHPyDEQX1OqTp7jFjm3SS9sjczYPoy82TuM-cYQRvDOwksL-1WKyieMjhOQdev_gCEnhZCa6egngGALopxa3iiDdalrXW-nZxdIPcLe7lfEpQ1bTVUfFjE6cJw8LWOQZ2efHr89qN3rFtjH1mNvRsTn5nF2Q-LJgwL_klW0OPKS-09WHLQgwlLXxPNt6OrMdprxtiYtuEGNgcf2K6vPh9v7gz2DHjg-v3uPj29s3Xzfvy5NO7D5vXJ6WrarWU0kHbQFfVXd1y6KCzNQ7aOeWEQg4anHaKdk7yuudCDqiU65SwtVOCSy6PiycH3znFs5Uim8lnh-NoA8Y1G9nItm15S-Cjf8DTuKZA2YwAJQVvQBKkDpBLMeeEg6FGJpvODQez799c9W_25RoQ5qp_I0j38aBLOKO7ESGdgHMczc5IK4GucxoBJJXW05CNtPP-I5U2XNbcfF8m8nt8HdZmZ8ch2eB8_humUjXnrSbu1YFDqnjnMZnsPAaHvU_oFtNH_5_kfwCGkLWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205321803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Haar, Lawrence ; Stanciu, Laura N</creator><creatorcontrib>Haar, Lawrence ; Stanciu, Laura N</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to
Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Applied sciences ; Criticism ; Customer choice ; Demand ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Green power ; Policy studies ; Power ; Public goods ; Renewable energy ; Renewable energy sources ; Renewable resources ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2002-12, Vol.30 (15), p.1357-1361</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421502000782$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,3993,27845,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14561197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a30_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a15_3ap_3a1357-1361.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanciu, Laura N</creatorcontrib><title>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to
Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Customer choice</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Green power</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN2K1TAUhYsoOI4-ghAERS-qO0nTtN6IHPyDEQX1OqTp7jFjm3SS9sjczYPoy82TuM-cYQRvDOwksL-1WKyieMjhOQdev_gCEnhZCa6egngGALopxa3iiDdalrXW-nZxdIPcLe7lfEpQ1bTVUfFjE6cJw8LWOQZ2efHr89qN3rFtjH1mNvRsTn5nF2Q-LJgwL_klW0OPKS-09WHLQgwlLXxPNt6OrMdprxtiYtuEGNgcf2K6vPh9v7gz2DHjg-v3uPj29s3Xzfvy5NO7D5vXJ6WrarWU0kHbQFfVXd1y6KCzNQ7aOeWEQg4anHaKdk7yuudCDqiU65SwtVOCSy6PiycH3znFs5Uim8lnh-NoA8Y1G9nItm15S-Cjf8DTuKZA2YwAJQVvQBKkDpBLMeeEg6FGJpvODQez799c9W_25RoQ5qp_I0j38aBLOKO7ESGdgHMczc5IK4GucxoBJJXW05CNtPP-I5U2XNbcfF8m8nt8HdZmZ8ch2eB8_humUjXnrSbu1YFDqnjnMZnsPAaHvU_oFtNH_5_kfwCGkLWM</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Haar, Lawrence</creator><creator>Stanciu, Laura N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</title><author>Haar, Lawrence ; Stanciu, Laura N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Customer choice</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Green power</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanciu, Laura N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haar, Lawrence</au><au>Stanciu, Laura N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1357-1361</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to
Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2002-12, Vol.30 (15), p.1357-1361 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38399919 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Applied sciences Criticism Customer choice Demand Economic data Electric energy Energy Energy economics Energy policy Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies Green power Policy studies Power Public goods Renewable energy Renewable energy sources Renewable resources Studies |
title | Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20upon%20%E2%80%9CPublic%20goods%20and%20private%20interests:%20understanding%20non-residential%20demand%20for%20green%20power%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Haar,%20Lawrence&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1357-1361&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38399919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205321803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421502000782&rfr_iscdi=true |