Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”

This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that busi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2002-12, Vol.30 (15), p.1357-1361
Hauptverfasser: Haar, Lawrence, Stanciu, Laura N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1361
container_issue 15
container_start_page 1357
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 30
creator Haar, Lawrence
Stanciu, Laura N
description This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38399919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421502000782</els_id><sourcerecordid>38399919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN2K1TAUhYsoOI4-ghAERS-qO0nTtN6IHPyDEQX1OqTp7jFjm3SS9sjczYPoy82TuM-cYQRvDOwksL-1WKyieMjhOQdev_gCEnhZCa6egngGALopxa3iiDdalrXW-nZxdIPcLe7lfEpQ1bTVUfFjE6cJw8LWOQZ2efHr89qN3rFtjH1mNvRsTn5nF2Q-LJgwL_klW0OPKS-09WHLQgwlLXxPNt6OrMdprxtiYtuEGNgcf2K6vPh9v7gz2DHjg-v3uPj29s3Xzfvy5NO7D5vXJ6WrarWU0kHbQFfVXd1y6KCzNQ7aOeWEQg4anHaKdk7yuudCDqiU65SwtVOCSy6PiycH3znFs5Uim8lnh-NoA8Y1G9nItm15S-Cjf8DTuKZA2YwAJQVvQBKkDpBLMeeEg6FGJpvODQez799c9W_25RoQ5qp_I0j38aBLOKO7ESGdgHMczc5IK4GucxoBJJXW05CNtPP-I5U2XNbcfF8m8nt8HdZmZ8ch2eB8_humUjXnrSbu1YFDqnjnMZnsPAaHvU_oFtNH_5_kfwCGkLWM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205321803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Haar, Lawrence ; Stanciu, Laura N</creator><creatorcontrib>Haar, Lawrence ; Stanciu, Laura N</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Applied sciences ; Criticism ; Customer choice ; Demand ; Economic data ; Electric energy ; Energy ; Energy economics ; Energy policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Green power ; Policy studies ; Power ; Public goods ; Renewable energy ; Renewable energy sources ; Renewable resources ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2002-12, Vol.30 (15), p.1357-1361</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421502000782$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,3993,27845,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14561197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a30_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a15_3ap_3a1357-1361.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanciu, Laura N</creatorcontrib><title>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Customer choice</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Electric energy</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Green power</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN2K1TAUhYsoOI4-ghAERS-qO0nTtN6IHPyDEQX1OqTp7jFjm3SS9sjczYPoy82TuM-cYQRvDOwksL-1WKyieMjhOQdev_gCEnhZCa6egngGALopxa3iiDdalrXW-nZxdIPcLe7lfEpQ1bTVUfFjE6cJw8LWOQZ2efHr89qN3rFtjH1mNvRsTn5nF2Q-LJgwL_klW0OPKS-09WHLQgwlLXxPNt6OrMdprxtiYtuEGNgcf2K6vPh9v7gz2DHjg-v3uPj29s3Xzfvy5NO7D5vXJ6WrarWU0kHbQFfVXd1y6KCzNQ7aOeWEQg4anHaKdk7yuudCDqiU65SwtVOCSy6PiycH3znFs5Uim8lnh-NoA8Y1G9nItm15S-Cjf8DTuKZA2YwAJQVvQBKkDpBLMeeEg6FGJpvODQez799c9W_25RoQ5qp_I0j38aBLOKO7ESGdgHMczc5IK4GucxoBJJXW05CNtPP-I5U2XNbcfF8m8nt8HdZmZ8ch2eB8_humUjXnrSbu1YFDqnjnMZnsPAaHvU_oFtNH_5_kfwCGkLWM</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Haar, Lawrence</creator><creator>Stanciu, Laura N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</title><author>Haar, Lawrence ; Stanciu, Laura N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-3c0980b46b6910b0ba6ef7cc5c25e1070c7c5b69c316d123fe55cb52a6c521313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Customer choice</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Electric energy</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Green power</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haar, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanciu, Laura N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haar, Lawrence</au><au>Stanciu, Laura N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1357-1361</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This article presents a critique of the recent contribution to Energy Policy (November 2001) by Wiser, Fowlie and Holt, entitled, “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”. In their article, the aforementioned authors explore the proposition that business and other organisations adopt green power, and will pay even a premium for it, because of what the authors describe as “altruism”. According to the article below, although Wiser et al. address an important problem and raise interesting issues, their attempt at challenging received theory and existing paradigms is undermined by the manner in which their research was undertaken. Deficiencies arise with regard to survey techniques, data preparation, model specification, and statistical methods. The deficiencies in their research methods cast doubt upon their findings, facilitating alternative interpretations of their empiricism.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2002-12, Vol.30 (15), p.1357-1361
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38399919
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alternative energy sources
Applied sciences
Criticism
Customer choice
Demand
Economic data
Electric energy
Energy
Energy economics
Energy policy
Exact sciences and technology
General, economic and professional studies
Green power
Policy studies
Power
Public goods
Renewable energy
Renewable energy sources
Renewable resources
Studies
title Comment upon “Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20upon%20%E2%80%9CPublic%20goods%20and%20private%20interests:%20understanding%20non-residential%20demand%20for%20green%20power%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Haar,%20Lawrence&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1357-1361&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00078-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38399919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205321803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421502000782&rfr_iscdi=true