More power to the WTO?
Because of its unique characteristics (package deals; effective dispute resolution), the WTO has the potential to become a key pillar of global governance. In principle, it could very well take on additional duties relating to the environment, labour, investment, competition law, etc. Yet in its pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international economic law 2001-03, Vol.4 (1), p.41-65 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Journal of international economic law |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Bronckers, M. |
description | Because of its unique characteristics (package deals; effective dispute resolution), the WTO has the potential to become a key pillar of global governance. In principle, it could very well take on additional duties relating to the environment, labour, investment, competition law, etc. Yet in its present form, the WTO cannot responsibly assume a larger mandate. A number of fundamental, institutional changes will first have to be made. Trade and other societal values incorporated in the WTO framework ought to be recognized as equals; a liberal trade bias to interpret each and every rule in the WTO package is to be excluded. Co-operation with specialized international organizations, and NGOs, to prepare and implement new norms must intensify. To a greater extent the WTO ought to operate as an open, rather than a self-contained, regime under public international law. It is up to its members, the now some 140 countries including the European Union, to enable the WTO to take up this challenge. If national governments do so, and thereby take the need for global governance seriously, the WTO deserves a better name: the World Economic Organization, the WEO. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jiel/4.1.41 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38388863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>405273501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-64ffe3383bf4c12be75c748a2d936174f81954cb1bf9973af998211abb855f333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouK6eBM_FgxdpN9OZtslJZPELVvay4jE0NcGW7qYmXcR_b8p68jLvHB6eGV7GLoFnwCUuutb0C8ogIzhiM6CSUqwKcRx3LGWKHOmUnYXQcQ4VAczY1avzJhnct_HJ6JLx0yTvm_XdOTuxdR_MxV_O2dvjw2b5nK7WTy_L-1XaEJdjWpK1BlGgttRArk1VNBWJOv-QWMYLVoAsqNGgrZQV1nGKHKDWWhSFRcQ5uzl4B---9iaMatuGxvR9vTNuH1RUCyHKCbz-B3Zu73fxN5WD4NFeigjdHqDGuxC8sWrw7bb2Pwq4mgpSU0GKFCgC_AX8TVW7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218099768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>More power to the WTO?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bronckers, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bronckers, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Because of its unique characteristics (package deals; effective dispute resolution), the WTO has the potential to become a key pillar of global governance. In principle, it could very well take on additional duties relating to the environment, labour, investment, competition law, etc. Yet in its present form, the WTO cannot responsibly assume a larger mandate. A number of fundamental, institutional changes will first have to be made. Trade and other societal values incorporated in the WTO framework ought to be recognized as equals; a liberal trade bias to interpret each and every rule in the WTO package is to be excluded. Co-operation with specialized international organizations, and NGOs, to prepare and implement new norms must intensify. To a greater extent the WTO ought to operate as an open, rather than a self-contained, regime under public international law. It is up to its members, the now some 140 countries including the European Union, to enable the WTO to take up this challenge. If national governments do so, and thereby take the need for global governance seriously, the WTO deserves a better name: the World Economic Organization, the WEO. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-3034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jiel/4.1.41</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Competition policy ; Decision making ; Developing countries ; Institutional change ; Intellectual property ; International ; International economic law ; International economic relations ; International law ; International organizations ; International trade ; Jurisdiction ; LDCs ; Non-governmental organizations ; Organizations ; Political power ; Studies ; World Trade Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of international economic law, 2001-03, Vol.4 (1), p.41-65</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Mar 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-64ffe3383bf4c12be75c748a2d936174f81954cb1bf9973af998211abb855f333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bronckers, M.</creatorcontrib><title>More power to the WTO?</title><title>Journal of international economic law</title><description>Because of its unique characteristics (package deals; effective dispute resolution), the WTO has the potential to become a key pillar of global governance. In principle, it could very well take on additional duties relating to the environment, labour, investment, competition law, etc. Yet in its present form, the WTO cannot responsibly assume a larger mandate. A number of fundamental, institutional changes will first have to be made. Trade and other societal values incorporated in the WTO framework ought to be recognized as equals; a liberal trade bias to interpret each and every rule in the WTO package is to be excluded. Co-operation with specialized international organizations, and NGOs, to prepare and implement new norms must intensify. To a greater extent the WTO ought to operate as an open, rather than a self-contained, regime under public international law. It is up to its members, the now some 140 countries including the European Union, to enable the WTO to take up this challenge. If national governments do so, and thereby take the need for global governance seriously, the WTO deserves a better name: the World Economic Organization, the WEO. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Competition policy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International economic law</subject><subject>International economic relations</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>World Trade Organization</subject><issn>1369-3034</issn><issn>1464-3758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouK6eBM_FgxdpN9OZtslJZPELVvay4jE0NcGW7qYmXcR_b8p68jLvHB6eGV7GLoFnwCUuutb0C8ogIzhiM6CSUqwKcRx3LGWKHOmUnYXQcQ4VAczY1avzJhnct_HJ6JLx0yTvm_XdOTuxdR_MxV_O2dvjw2b5nK7WTy_L-1XaEJdjWpK1BlGgttRArk1VNBWJOv-QWMYLVoAsqNGgrZQV1nGKHKDWWhSFRcQ5uzl4B---9iaMatuGxvR9vTNuH1RUCyHKCbz-B3Zu73fxN5WD4NFeigjdHqDGuxC8sWrw7bb2Pwq4mgpSU0GKFCgC_AX8TVW7</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Bronckers, M.</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>More power to the WTO?</title><author>Bronckers, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-64ffe3383bf4c12be75c748a2d936174f81954cb1bf9973af998211abb855f333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Competition policy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International economic law</topic><topic>International economic relations</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>World Trade Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bronckers, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of international economic law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bronckers, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More power to the WTO?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international economic law</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>41-65</pages><issn>1369-3034</issn><eissn>1464-3758</eissn><abstract>Because of its unique characteristics (package deals; effective dispute resolution), the WTO has the potential to become a key pillar of global governance. In principle, it could very well take on additional duties relating to the environment, labour, investment, competition law, etc. Yet in its present form, the WTO cannot responsibly assume a larger mandate. A number of fundamental, institutional changes will first have to be made. Trade and other societal values incorporated in the WTO framework ought to be recognized as equals; a liberal trade bias to interpret each and every rule in the WTO package is to be excluded. Co-operation with specialized international organizations, and NGOs, to prepare and implement new norms must intensify. To a greater extent the WTO ought to operate as an open, rather than a self-contained, regime under public international law. It is up to its members, the now some 140 countries including the European Union, to enable the WTO to take up this challenge. If national governments do so, and thereby take the need for global governance seriously, the WTO deserves a better name: the World Economic Organization, the WEO. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><doi>10.1093/jiel/4.1.41</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-3034 |
ispartof | Journal of international economic law, 2001-03, Vol.4 (1), p.41-65 |
issn | 1369-3034 1464-3758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38388863 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Competition policy Decision making Developing countries Institutional change Intellectual property International International economic law International economic relations International law International organizations International trade Jurisdiction LDCs Non-governmental organizations Organizations Political power Studies World Trade Organization |
title | More power to the WTO? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20power%20to%20the%20WTO?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20economic%20law&rft.au=Bronckers,%20M.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=41-65&rft.issn=1369-3034&rft.eissn=1464-3758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jiel/4.1.41&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E405273501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218099768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |