Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?

Building on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based theory of the firm, it is argued that, following a technological change that is competence-destroying to firms and their suppliers, firms that are integrated vertically into the new technology will perform better than those that are not....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academy of Management journal 2001-12, Vol.44 (6), p.1211-1228
1. Verfasser: Afuah, Allan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1228
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1211
container_title Academy of Management journal
container_volume 44
creator Afuah, Allan
description Building on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based theory of the firm, it is argued that, following a technological change that is competence-destroying to firms and their suppliers, firms that are integrated vertically into the new technology will perform better than those that are not. At the same time, firms that had been vertically integrated into the old technology will perform worse than those that had not been. This argument suggests that the efficient boundaries of a firm are dynamic. The adoption of reduced instruction set computer (RISC) technology by makers of computer workstations was used to explore the hypotheses.
doi_str_mv 10.5465/3069397
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38362089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38362089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-154af7c280dbe317ff789d9ca2846ecdf232ace51da94fca2cc833c1929025453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1PwzAMhiMEEmMg_kLEAU6FfLRNwwVtg8GkSbsMrlVInS5Tm46kFdq_p1V34uTX9uPXlhG6peQxidPkiZNUcinO0ITKOIuIzOQ5mhBCaBQzwS_RVQj7Pu2bcoJ-X49O1VbjedO5QnkLATcGtzvAS-vrZzzzowp4Dm0LHm-M6aV1Jf4C31qtquqIV66F0qsWCmzdOK00DE4Kb0HvXFM15cDixU65El6u0YVRVYCbU5yiz-XbdvERrTfvq8VsHWkmZBvRJFZGaJaR4hs4FcaITBZSK5bFKejCMM76RQktlIxNX9Y641xTySRhSZzwKboffQ---ekgtHltg4aqUg6aLuQ84ykjmezBu3_gvum862_LqZRCCJoObg8jpH0TggeTH7ytlT_mlOTD9_PT9_kfMgV1sQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199777165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Afuah, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Afuah, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>Building on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based theory of the firm, it is argued that, following a technological change that is competence-destroying to firms and their suppliers, firms that are integrated vertically into the new technology will perform better than those that are not. At the same time, firms that had been vertically integrated into the old technology will perform worse than those that had not been. This argument suggests that the efficient boundaries of a firm are dynamic. The adoption of reduced instruction set computer (RISC) technology by makers of computer workstations was used to explore the hypotheses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5465/3069397</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMJOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management</publisher><subject>Computer industry ; Computers ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; Economic theory ; Firm theory ; Knowledge ; Microprocessors ; Organizational change ; Organizational structure ; Organizations ; Product development ; RISC ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Technological change ; Technology ; Transaction costs ; Vertical integration ; Work stations</subject><ispartof>Academy of Management journal, 2001-12, Vol.44 (6), p.1211-1228</ispartof><rights>Copyright Academy of Management Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-154af7c280dbe317ff789d9ca2846ecdf232ace51da94fca2cc833c1929025453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-154af7c280dbe317ff789d9ca2846ecdf232ace51da94fca2cc833c1929025453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Afuah, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?</title><title>Academy of Management journal</title><description>Building on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based theory of the firm, it is argued that, following a technological change that is competence-destroying to firms and their suppliers, firms that are integrated vertically into the new technology will perform better than those that are not. At the same time, firms that had been vertically integrated into the old technology will perform worse than those that had not been. This argument suggests that the efficient boundaries of a firm are dynamic. The adoption of reduced instruction set computer (RISC) technology by makers of computer workstations was used to explore the hypotheses.</description><subject>Computer industry</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Firm theory</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Microprocessors</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>RISC</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>Vertical integration</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><issn>0001-4273</issn><issn>1948-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1PwzAMhiMEEmMg_kLEAU6FfLRNwwVtg8GkSbsMrlVInS5Tm46kFdq_p1V34uTX9uPXlhG6peQxidPkiZNUcinO0ITKOIuIzOQ5mhBCaBQzwS_RVQj7Pu2bcoJ-X49O1VbjedO5QnkLATcGtzvAS-vrZzzzowp4Dm0LHm-M6aV1Jf4C31qtquqIV66F0qsWCmzdOK00DE4Kb0HvXFM15cDixU65El6u0YVRVYCbU5yiz-XbdvERrTfvq8VsHWkmZBvRJFZGaJaR4hs4FcaITBZSK5bFKejCMM76RQktlIxNX9Y641xTySRhSZzwKboffQ---ekgtHltg4aqUg6aLuQ84ykjmezBu3_gvum862_LqZRCCJoObg8jpH0TggeTH7ytlT_mlOTD9_PT9_kfMgV1sQ</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Afuah, Allan</creator><general>Academy of Management</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?</title><author>Afuah, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-154af7c280dbe317ff789d9ca2846ecdf232ace51da94fca2cc833c1929025453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Computer industry</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Firm theory</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Microprocessors</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>RISC</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>Vertical integration</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Afuah, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Academy of Management journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Afuah, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?</atitle><jtitle>Academy of Management journal</jtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1228</epage><pages>1211-1228</pages><issn>0001-4273</issn><eissn>1948-0989</eissn><coden>AMJOD6</coden><abstract>Building on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based theory of the firm, it is argued that, following a technological change that is competence-destroying to firms and their suppliers, firms that are integrated vertically into the new technology will perform better than those that are not. At the same time, firms that had been vertically integrated into the old technology will perform worse than those that had not been. This argument suggests that the efficient boundaries of a firm are dynamic. The adoption of reduced instruction set computer (RISC) technology by makers of computer workstations was used to explore the hypotheses.</abstract><cop>Briarcliff Manor</cop><pub>Academy of Management</pub><doi>10.5465/3069397</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4273
ispartof Academy of Management journal, 2001-12, Vol.44 (6), p.1211-1228
issn 0001-4273
1948-0989
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38362089
source Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Computer industry
Computers
Cost analysis
Costs
Economic theory
Firm theory
Knowledge
Microprocessors
Organizational change
Organizational structure
Organizations
Product development
RISC
Studies
Suppliers
Technological change
Technology
Transaction costs
Vertical integration
Work stations
title Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms Better Off Being Vertically Integrated in the Face of a Technological Change?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A19%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Boundaries%20of%20the%20Firm:%20Are%20Firms%20Better%20Off%20Being%20Vertically%20Integrated%20in%20the%20Face%20of%20a%20Technological%20Change?&rft.jtitle=Academy%20of%20Management%20journal&rft.au=Afuah,%20Allan&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1228&rft.pages=1211-1228&rft.issn=0001-4273&rft.eissn=1948-0989&rft.coden=AMJOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.5465/3069397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38362089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199777165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true