Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence

This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the internation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international economics 2001-10, Vol.55 (1), p.3-28
Hauptverfasser: Fatás, Antonio, Mihov, Ilian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Journal of international economics
container_volume 55
creator Fatás, Antonio
Mihov, Ilian
description This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38298321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022199601000939</els_id><sourcerecordid>38298321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-BGFPoofVfGx2N15ERKsgeLD3ME1mMbKbrUlaqH-9aSu9engz8HhvGH6EXDB6wyirbz8o5bxkStVXlF1TSpUo1QGZsLYRJRVSHJLJPnJMTmL8yqGmFdWEfEzHFQY_oE9FdD9YgLcFLNM4QHKmiAnmrs9-iHeF8ylHsz966LfB7ATYO7hyFr3BM3LUQR_x_G-fktnz0-zxpXx7n74-PryVpuYqlbYTCLKppOC2AZjTGizD_K-qQBppK4kNt3beKgFWVbU1psKqq-a0U4JZcUoud2cXYfxeYkx6cNFg34PHcRm1aLlqBWc5KHdBE8YYA3Z6EdwAYa0Z1RuCektQb_BoyvSWoFa5N931Ai7Q7EuI6Dya0euVFiBlHussTnNVgMva7EWW0LzVn2nIl-53lzDjWDkMOhq3QWVdQJO0Hd0_v_wC_RCS4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38298321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian</creator><creatorcontrib>Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian</creatorcontrib><description>This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Automatic stabilizers ; Automation ; Business cycles ; Economics ; Evidence ; Government ; Government size ; International economics ; Intranational economics ; OECD ; Organizational size ; Output rate ; Stabilization policy ; U.S.A ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Journal of international economics, 2001-10, Vol.55 (1), p.3-28</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeinecon/v_3a55_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a3-28.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fatás, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihov, Ilian</creatorcontrib><title>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</title><title>Journal of international economics</title><description>This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.</description><subject>Automatic stabilizers</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government size</subject><subject>International economics</subject><subject>Intranational economics</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Organizational size</subject><subject>Output rate</subject><subject>Stabilization policy</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0022-1996</issn><issn>1873-0353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-BGFPoofVfGx2N15ERKsgeLD3ME1mMbKbrUlaqH-9aSu9engz8HhvGH6EXDB6wyirbz8o5bxkStVXlF1TSpUo1QGZsLYRJRVSHJLJPnJMTmL8yqGmFdWEfEzHFQY_oE9FdD9YgLcFLNM4QHKmiAnmrs9-iHeF8ylHsz966LfB7ATYO7hyFr3BM3LUQR_x_G-fktnz0-zxpXx7n74-PryVpuYqlbYTCLKppOC2AZjTGizD_K-qQBppK4kNt3beKgFWVbU1psKqq-a0U4JZcUoud2cXYfxeYkx6cNFg34PHcRm1aLlqBWc5KHdBE8YYA3Z6EdwAYa0Z1RuCektQb_BoyvSWoFa5N931Ai7Q7EuI6Dya0euVFiBlHussTnNVgMva7EWW0LzVn2nIl-53lzDjWDkMOhq3QWVdQJO0Hd0_v_wC_RCS4g</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Fatás, Antonio</creator><creator>Mihov, Ilian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</title><author>Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Automatic stabilizers</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government size</topic><topic>International economics</topic><topic>Intranational economics</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Organizational size</topic><topic>Output rate</topic><topic>Stabilization policy</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fatás, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihov, Ilian</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of international economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fatás, Antonio</au><au>Mihov, Ilian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international economics</jtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>3-28</pages><issn>0022-1996</issn><eissn>1873-0353</eissn><abstract>This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1996
ispartof Journal of international economics, 2001-10, Vol.55 (1), p.3-28
issn 0022-1996
1873-0353
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38298321
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Automatic stabilizers
Automation
Business cycles
Economics
Evidence
Government
Government size
International economics
Intranational economics
OECD
Organizational size
Output rate
Stabilization policy
U.S.A
Volatility
title Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Government%20size%20and%20automatic%20stabilizers:%20international%20and%20intranational%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20economics&rft.au=Fat%C3%A1s,%20Antonio&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=3-28&rft.issn=0022-1996&rft.eissn=1873-0353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38298321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38298321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022199601000939&rfr_iscdi=true