Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence
This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the internation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international economics 2001-10, Vol.55 (1), p.3-28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 28 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Journal of international economics |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Fatás, Antonio Mihov, Ilian |
description | This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38298321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022199601000939</els_id><sourcerecordid>38298321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-BGFPoofVfGx2N15ERKsgeLD3ME1mMbKbrUlaqH-9aSu9engz8HhvGH6EXDB6wyirbz8o5bxkStVXlF1TSpUo1QGZsLYRJRVSHJLJPnJMTmL8yqGmFdWEfEzHFQY_oE9FdD9YgLcFLNM4QHKmiAnmrs9-iHeF8ylHsz966LfB7ATYO7hyFr3BM3LUQR_x_G-fktnz0-zxpXx7n74-PryVpuYqlbYTCLKppOC2AZjTGizD_K-qQBppK4kNt3beKgFWVbU1psKqq-a0U4JZcUoud2cXYfxeYkx6cNFg34PHcRm1aLlqBWc5KHdBE8YYA3Z6EdwAYa0Z1RuCektQb_BoyvSWoFa5N931Ai7Q7EuI6Dya0euVFiBlHussTnNVgMva7EWW0LzVn2nIl-53lzDjWDkMOhq3QWVdQJO0Hd0_v_wC_RCS4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38298321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian</creator><creatorcontrib>Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian</creatorcontrib><description>This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Automatic stabilizers ; Automation ; Business cycles ; Economics ; Evidence ; Government ; Government size ; International economics ; Intranational economics ; OECD ; Organizational size ; Output rate ; Stabilization policy ; U.S.A ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Journal of international economics, 2001-10, Vol.55 (1), p.3-28</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeinecon/v_3a55_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a3-28.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fatás, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihov, Ilian</creatorcontrib><title>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</title><title>Journal of international economics</title><description>This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.</description><subject>Automatic stabilizers</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government size</subject><subject>International economics</subject><subject>Intranational economics</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Organizational size</subject><subject>Output rate</subject><subject>Stabilization policy</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0022-1996</issn><issn>1873-0353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWD_-BGFPoofVfGx2N15ERKsgeLD3ME1mMbKbrUlaqH-9aSu9engz8HhvGH6EXDB6wyirbz8o5bxkStVXlF1TSpUo1QGZsLYRJRVSHJLJPnJMTmL8yqGmFdWEfEzHFQY_oE9FdD9YgLcFLNM4QHKmiAnmrs9-iHeF8ylHsz966LfB7ATYO7hyFr3BM3LUQR_x_G-fktnz0-zxpXx7n74-PryVpuYqlbYTCLKppOC2AZjTGizD_K-qQBppK4kNt3beKgFWVbU1psKqq-a0U4JZcUoud2cXYfxeYkx6cNFg34PHcRm1aLlqBWc5KHdBE8YYA3Z6EdwAYa0Z1RuCektQb_BoyvSWoFa5N931Ai7Q7EuI6Dya0euVFiBlHussTnNVgMva7EWW0LzVn2nIl-53lzDjWDkMOhq3QWVdQJO0Hd0_v_wC_RCS4g</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Fatás, Antonio</creator><creator>Mihov, Ilian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</title><author>Fatás, Antonio ; Mihov, Ilian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-df3ea574532d7aab06ad1e03594a5c5d45e72ddb893ad946dcc4e4f4b0f931d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Automatic stabilizers</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government size</topic><topic>International economics</topic><topic>Intranational economics</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Organizational size</topic><topic>Output rate</topic><topic>Stabilization policy</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fatás, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihov, Ilian</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of international economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fatás, Antonio</au><au>Mihov, Ilian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international economics</jtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>3-28</pages><issn>0022-1996</issn><eissn>1873-0353</eissn><abstract>This paper documents a strong negative correlation between government size and output volatility both for the OECD countries and across US states. This correlation is robust to the inclusion of a large set of controls as well as to alternative methods of detrending and estimation. In the international sample, a one percentage point increase in government spending relative to GDP reduces output volatility by eight basis points. Whereas in the US states the reduction in volatility is significantly larger ranging from 13 to 40 basis points.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1996 |
ispartof | Journal of international economics, 2001-10, Vol.55 (1), p.3-28 |
issn | 0022-1996 1873-0353 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38298321 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Automatic stabilizers Automation Business cycles Economics Evidence Government Government size International economics Intranational economics OECD Organizational size Output rate Stabilization policy U.S.A Volatility |
title | Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Government%20size%20and%20automatic%20stabilizers:%20international%20and%20intranational%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20economics&rft.au=Fat%C3%A1s,%20Antonio&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=3-28&rft.issn=0022-1996&rft.eissn=1873-0353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00093-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38298321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38298321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022199601000939&rfr_iscdi=true |