Common Ground Between Free-Traders and Environmentalists

We use a North-South model with property right differences and resource dynamics to study the effects of trade on resource use and welfare. Autarky is likely to Pareto-dominate free trade in the long run when the environment is quite fragile, and the result is reversed when the environment is quite...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International economic review (Philadelphia) 2001-08, Vol.42 (3), p.617-648
Hauptverfasser: Karp, Larry, Sacheti, Sandeep, Zhao, Jinhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 3
container_start_page 617
container_title International economic review (Philadelphia)
container_volume 42
creator Karp, Larry
Sacheti, Sandeep
Zhao, Jinhua
description We use a North-South model with property right differences and resource dynamics to study the effects of trade on resource use and welfare. Autarky is likely to Pareto-dominate free trade in the long run when the environment is quite fragile, and the result is reversed when the environment is quite resilient. Trade may cause an environmentally poor country to "drag down" its richer trading partner, when they degrade their stocks which would be preserved under autarky. It may enable the environmentally richer country to "pull up" its partner, when they preserve their stocks which would be degraded under autarky.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1468-2354.00127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38290404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>827023</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>827023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5987-33874937ba0f64d64f9ced1e7896fa30c9f959df384c8dd0c26bb973e131fc2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEuUxM7BUDGwp14_E9ghVWyrxkBCoo-UmN1JKEoOdUvj3uAR1YMGLJX_f8b06hJxRGNF4rqjIVMJ4KkYAlMk9Mti97JMBAIMkS7U6JEchrAAg40IOiBq7pnHtcObdui2GN9htENvh1CMmz94W6MPQxmDSflTetQ22na2r0IUTclDaOuDp731MXqaT5_Ftcvc4m4-v75I8DpMJ50oKzeXSQpmJIhOlzrGgKJXOSssh16VOdVFyJXJVFJCzbLnUkiPltMyZ5cfksv_3zbv3NYbONFXIsa5ti24dDFdMgwARixd_iiu39m3czTAap2mRbktXfSn3LgSPpXnzVWP9l6FgthrNVprZSjM_GiMhemJT1fj1X93MJ0-THjvvsVXonN9hiklgPKZJn0aT-LlLrX81meQyNYuHmVnA7FY_3d8Yyb8B92KK4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218969454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Common Ground Between Free-Traders and Environmentalists</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Karp, Larry ; Sacheti, Sandeep ; Zhao, Jinhua</creator><creatorcontrib>Karp, Larry ; Sacheti, Sandeep ; Zhao, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><description>We use a North-South model with property right differences and resource dynamics to study the effects of trade on resource use and welfare. Autarky is likely to Pareto-dominate free trade in the long run when the environment is quite fragile, and the result is reversed when the environment is quite resilient. Trade may cause an environmentally poor country to "drag down" its richer trading partner, when they degrade their stocks which would be preserved under autarky. It may enable the environmentally richer country to "pull up" its partner, when they preserve their stocks which would be degraded under autarky.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-6598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1468-2354.00127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>Countries ; Economic theory ; Environmental economics ; Environmentalism ; Environmentalists ; Free trade ; Natural resources ; North South trade ; Pareto optimum ; Property rights ; Resource stocks ; Steady state economies ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Trade ; Trade regionalization ; Welfare ; Welfare economics</subject><ispartof>International economic review (Philadelphia), 2001-08, Vol.42 (3), p.617-648</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association</rights><rights>Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5987-33874937ba0f64d64f9ced1e7896fa30c9f959df384c8dd0c26bb973e131fc2a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/827023$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/827023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karp, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacheti, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><title>Common Ground Between Free-Traders and Environmentalists</title><title>International economic review (Philadelphia)</title><description>We use a North-South model with property right differences and resource dynamics to study the effects of trade on resource use and welfare. Autarky is likely to Pareto-dominate free trade in the long run when the environment is quite fragile, and the result is reversed when the environment is quite resilient. Trade may cause an environmentally poor country to "drag down" its richer trading partner, when they degrade their stocks which would be preserved under autarky. It may enable the environmentally richer country to "pull up" its partner, when they preserve their stocks which would be degraded under autarky.</description><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Environmentalists</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>North South trade</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Resource stocks</subject><subject>Steady state economies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade regionalization</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><issn>0020-6598</issn><issn>1468-2354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EEuUxM7BUDGwp14_E9ghVWyrxkBCoo-UmN1JKEoOdUvj3uAR1YMGLJX_f8b06hJxRGNF4rqjIVMJ4KkYAlMk9Mti97JMBAIMkS7U6JEchrAAg40IOiBq7pnHtcObdui2GN9htENvh1CMmz94W6MPQxmDSflTetQ22na2r0IUTclDaOuDp731MXqaT5_Ftcvc4m4-v75I8DpMJ50oKzeXSQpmJIhOlzrGgKJXOSssh16VOdVFyJXJVFJCzbLnUkiPltMyZ5cfksv_3zbv3NYbONFXIsa5ti24dDFdMgwARixd_iiu39m3czTAap2mRbktXfSn3LgSPpXnzVWP9l6FgthrNVprZSjM_GiMhemJT1fj1X93MJ0-THjvvsVXonN9hiklgPKZJn0aT-LlLrX81meQyNYuHmVnA7FY_3d8Yyb8B92KK4Q</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Karp, Larry</creator><creator>Sacheti, Sandeep</creator><creator>Zhao, Jinhua</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Common Ground Between Free-Traders and Environmentalists</title><author>Karp, Larry ; Sacheti, Sandeep ; Zhao, Jinhua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5987-33874937ba0f64d64f9ced1e7896fa30c9f959df384c8dd0c26bb973e131fc2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Environmentalists</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>North South trade</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Resource stocks</topic><topic>Steady state economies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade regionalization</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karp, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacheti, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International economic review (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karp, Larry</au><au>Sacheti, Sandeep</au><au>Zhao, Jinhua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Common Ground Between Free-Traders and Environmentalists</atitle><jtitle>International economic review (Philadelphia)</jtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>617-648</pages><issn>0020-6598</issn><eissn>1468-2354</eissn><abstract>We use a North-South model with property right differences and resource dynamics to study the effects of trade on resource use and welfare. Autarky is likely to Pareto-dominate free trade in the long run when the environment is quite fragile, and the result is reversed when the environment is quite resilient. Trade may cause an environmentally poor country to "drag down" its richer trading partner, when they degrade their stocks which would be preserved under autarky. It may enable the environmentally richer country to "pull up" its partner, when they preserve their stocks which would be degraded under autarky.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1468-2354.00127</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-6598
ispartof International economic review (Philadelphia), 2001-08, Vol.42 (3), p.617-648
issn 0020-6598
1468-2354
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38290404
source Wiley Journals; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Countries
Economic theory
Environmental economics
Environmentalism
Environmentalists
Free trade
Natural resources
North South trade
Pareto optimum
Property rights
Resource stocks
Steady state economies
Studies
Sustainability
Trade
Trade regionalization
Welfare
Welfare economics
title Common Ground Between Free-Traders and Environmentalists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A22%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Common%20Ground%20Between%20Free-Traders%20and%20Environmentalists&rft.jtitle=International%20economic%20review%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=Karp,%20Larry&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=617-648&rft.issn=0020-6598&rft.eissn=1468-2354&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1468-2354.00127&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E827023%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218969454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=827023&rfr_iscdi=true