Pricing Eurodollar Futures Options with the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model
This article uses the algorithm developed by Ritchken and Sankarasubramanian (1995) to make comparisons among the Heath—Jarrow—Morton (HJM) models (Heath, Jarrow, & Morton, 1992) with different volatility structures in pricing the Eurodollar futures options. We show that the differences among th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of futures markets 2001-07, Vol.21 (7), p.655-680 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 680 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 655 |
container_title | The journal of futures markets |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Cakici, Nusret Zhu, Jintao |
description | This article uses the algorithm developed by Ritchken and Sankarasubramanian (1995) to make comparisons among the Heath—Jarrow—Morton (HJM) models (Heath, Jarrow, & Morton, 1992) with different volatility structures in pricing the Eurodollar futures options. We show that the differences among the HJM models as well as the difference between the HJM models and Black's model can be insignificant when the volatility of the forward rate is relatively small. Moreover, our findings imply that the difference between the American‐style and European‐style options is insignificant for options with a life of less than 1 year. However, the difference can be significant for options with a 1‐year maturity, the difference depending on the exercise price. Finally, our tests indicate that the difference between the forward price and the futures price is insignificant if the volatility parameter is low enough and when the volatility of the spot rate is proportional to the spot rate. A higher volatility parameter can lead to a significant difference between the forward price and the futures price, although its impact on the price of the options will still be trivial. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21: 655–680, 2001 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fut.1703 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38257304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38257304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4213-261548d70e9d3d7b4db8694c063a66ec2b4bff69f70e0937f1c99acdc1385d183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FtLwzAYxvEgCs4p-BGKF-JNZ05tmksZO6g7KG4MvAlpmrrOrplJyty3t2MiKHj13vx4efgDcIlgB0GIb_PadxCD5Ai0EORxyDmhx6AFMYMhI4iegjPnVhBCzilsgd6TLVRRvQW92prMlKW0Qb_2tdUumG58YSoXbAu_DPxSB0Mt_TJ8kNaabTg21psqGJtMl-fgJJel0xfftw3m_d6sOwxH08F9924UKooRCXGMIppkDGqekYylNEuTmFMFYyLjWCuc0jTPY543AnLCcqQ4lypTiCRRhhLSBteHvxtrPmrtvFgXTulmdaVN7QRJcMQIpA28-gNXprZVs01ghDCjuOnSBjcHpKxxzupcbGyxlnYnEBT7mKKJKfYxGxoe6LYo9e5fJ_rz2W9fOK8_f7y07yJmhEViMRmIl8krf3weU7EgXzSKg-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211274299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pricing Eurodollar Futures Options with the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cakici, Nusret ; Zhu, Jintao</creator><creatorcontrib>Cakici, Nusret ; Zhu, Jintao</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses the algorithm developed by Ritchken and Sankarasubramanian (1995) to make comparisons among the Heath—Jarrow—Morton (HJM) models (Heath, Jarrow, & Morton, 1992) with different volatility structures in pricing the Eurodollar futures options. We show that the differences among the HJM models as well as the difference between the HJM models and Black's model can be insignificant when the volatility of the forward rate is relatively small. Moreover, our findings imply that the difference between the American‐style and European‐style options is insignificant for options with a life of less than 1 year. However, the difference can be significant for options with a 1‐year maturity, the difference depending on the exercise price. Finally, our tests indicate that the difference between the forward price and the futures price is insignificant if the volatility parameter is low enough and when the volatility of the spot rate is proportional to the spot rate. A higher volatility parameter can lead to a significant difference between the forward price and the futures price, although its impact on the price of the options will still be trivial. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21: 655–680, 2001</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-7314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9934</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fut.1703</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFMADT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Arbitrage ; Eurodollar markets ; Eurodollars ; Futures trading ; Interest rates ; Mathematical models ; Option pricing ; Price models ; Securities prices ; Stochastic models ; Stock prices ; Studies ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>The journal of futures markets, 2001-07, Vol.21 (7), p.655-680</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4213-261548d70e9d3d7b4db8694c063a66ec2b4bff69f70e0937f1c99acdc1385d183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4213-261548d70e9d3d7b4db8694c063a66ec2b4bff69f70e0937f1c99acdc1385d183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffut.1703$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffut.1703$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cakici, Nusret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jintao</creatorcontrib><title>Pricing Eurodollar Futures Options with the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model</title><title>The journal of futures markets</title><addtitle>J. Fut. Mark</addtitle><description>This article uses the algorithm developed by Ritchken and Sankarasubramanian (1995) to make comparisons among the Heath—Jarrow—Morton (HJM) models (Heath, Jarrow, & Morton, 1992) with different volatility structures in pricing the Eurodollar futures options. We show that the differences among the HJM models as well as the difference between the HJM models and Black's model can be insignificant when the volatility of the forward rate is relatively small. Moreover, our findings imply that the difference between the American‐style and European‐style options is insignificant for options with a life of less than 1 year. However, the difference can be significant for options with a 1‐year maturity, the difference depending on the exercise price. Finally, our tests indicate that the difference between the forward price and the futures price is insignificant if the volatility parameter is low enough and when the volatility of the spot rate is proportional to the spot rate. A higher volatility parameter can lead to a significant difference between the forward price and the futures price, although its impact on the price of the options will still be trivial. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21: 655–680, 2001</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Arbitrage</subject><subject>Eurodollar markets</subject><subject>Eurodollars</subject><subject>Futures trading</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Option pricing</subject><subject>Price models</subject><subject>Securities prices</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0270-7314</issn><issn>1096-9934</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FtLwzAYxvEgCs4p-BGKF-JNZ05tmksZO6g7KG4MvAlpmrrOrplJyty3t2MiKHj13vx4efgDcIlgB0GIb_PadxCD5Ai0EORxyDmhx6AFMYMhI4iegjPnVhBCzilsgd6TLVRRvQW92prMlKW0Qb_2tdUumG58YSoXbAu_DPxSB0Mt_TJ8kNaabTg21psqGJtMl-fgJJel0xfftw3m_d6sOwxH08F9924UKooRCXGMIppkDGqekYylNEuTmFMFYyLjWCuc0jTPY543AnLCcqQ4lypTiCRRhhLSBteHvxtrPmrtvFgXTulmdaVN7QRJcMQIpA28-gNXprZVs01ghDCjuOnSBjcHpKxxzupcbGyxlnYnEBT7mKKJKfYxGxoe6LYo9e5fJ_rz2W9fOK8_f7y07yJmhEViMRmIl8krf3weU7EgXzSKg-I</recordid><startdate>200107</startdate><enddate>200107</enddate><creator>Cakici, Nusret</creator><creator>Zhu, Jintao</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200107</creationdate><title>Pricing Eurodollar Futures Options with the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model</title><author>Cakici, Nusret ; Zhu, Jintao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4213-261548d70e9d3d7b4db8694c063a66ec2b4bff69f70e0937f1c99acdc1385d183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Arbitrage</topic><topic>Eurodollar markets</topic><topic>Eurodollars</topic><topic>Futures trading</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Option pricing</topic><topic>Price models</topic><topic>Securities prices</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cakici, Nusret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jintao</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of futures markets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cakici, Nusret</au><au>Zhu, Jintao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pricing Eurodollar Futures Options with the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model</atitle><jtitle>The journal of futures markets</jtitle><addtitle>J. Fut. Mark</addtitle><date>2001-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>680</epage><pages>655-680</pages><issn>0270-7314</issn><eissn>1096-9934</eissn><coden>JFMADT</coden><abstract>This article uses the algorithm developed by Ritchken and Sankarasubramanian (1995) to make comparisons among the Heath—Jarrow—Morton (HJM) models (Heath, Jarrow, & Morton, 1992) with different volatility structures in pricing the Eurodollar futures options. We show that the differences among the HJM models as well as the difference between the HJM models and Black's model can be insignificant when the volatility of the forward rate is relatively small. Moreover, our findings imply that the difference between the American‐style and European‐style options is insignificant for options with a life of less than 1 year. However, the difference can be significant for options with a 1‐year maturity, the difference depending on the exercise price. Finally, our tests indicate that the difference between the forward price and the futures price is insignificant if the volatility parameter is low enough and when the volatility of the spot rate is proportional to the spot rate. A higher volatility parameter can lead to a significant difference between the forward price and the futures price, although its impact on the price of the options will still be trivial. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21: 655–680, 2001</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/fut.1703</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-7314 |
ispartof | The journal of futures markets, 2001-07, Vol.21 (7), p.655-680 |
issn | 0270-7314 1096-9934 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38257304 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Arbitrage Eurodollar markets Eurodollars Futures trading Interest rates Mathematical models Option pricing Price models Securities prices Stochastic models Stock prices Studies Volatility |
title | Pricing Eurodollar Futures Options with the Heath-Jarrow-Morton Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A31%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pricing%20Eurodollar%20Futures%20Options%20with%20the%20Heath-Jarrow-Morton%20Model&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20futures%20markets&rft.au=Cakici,%20Nusret&rft.date=2001-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=680&rft.pages=655-680&rft.issn=0270-7314&rft.eissn=1096-9934&rft.coden=JFMADT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fut.1703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38257304%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211274299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |