A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea

This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a col...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of development studies 2005-02, Vol.41 (2), p.242-260
1. Verfasser: Hundt, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 242
container_title The Journal of development studies
container_volume 41
creator Hundt, David
description This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0022038042000309232
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_repec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38212739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38212739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-56f90fc0847d0098fc9dd99d8c4be5d7b3a85ce12690cab7f72fcdc62d00e8ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1EJZaWX8Al4sAtMLGT2OaAVFV8Lx_i42x57THNKhtvbW_p_nsm3aoHVNHDeDzS8772zDD2tIEXDSh4CcA5CAUtBwABmgv-gC0a2YpaNy08ZIuZqAlRj9jjnNeEtZ2WC_b5tFri76EMG1uw-maT9fHqVfUFYz0OK0x2rL5jiGlT2clX5RypLLs0VTFcVz_KrBum6lNMaE_YUbBjxic3-Zj9evvm59n7evn13Yez02XtOslL3fVBQ3CgWukBtApOe6-1V65dYeflSljVOWx4r8HZlQySB-ddz4lGhV4cs-cH322KFzvMxWyG7HAc7YRxl00PvWo63d4LCsUbLoUm8Nk_4DpSm9SEodH2IPW1mzhALsWcEwazTTS4tDcNmHkR5o5FkOrjQZVwi-5WUmxYe7ykly6NsG1Dx56ChB2lYb5SbOfccsN7MOdlQ2b6YDZM81bsn5hGT177MaaQ7OSGfNcnTLkqpH19r1b8r5O_Z8K4OA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220607994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hundt, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0022038042000309232</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDVSA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Development studies ; East Asia ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Economic Development ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Korea ; Liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Policy Implementation ; Political economy ; Reform ; Regional studies ; South Korea ; State ; State Power ; State Role ; World economy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of development studies, 2005-02, Vol.41 (2), p.242-260</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Frank Cass &amp; Co. Ltd Feb 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-56f90fc0847d0098fc9dd99d8c4be5d7b3a85ce12690cab7f72fcdc62d00e8ed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3996,27911,27912,33761</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tafjdevst/v_3a41_3ay_3a2005_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a242-260.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><title>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</title><title>The Journal of development studies</title><description>This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.</description><subject>Development studies</subject><subject>East Asia</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Policy Implementation</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>State Power</subject><subject>State Role</subject><subject>World economy</subject><issn>0022-0388</issn><issn>1743-9140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1EJZaWX8Al4sAtMLGT2OaAVFV8Lx_i42x57THNKhtvbW_p_nsm3aoHVNHDeDzS8772zDD2tIEXDSh4CcA5CAUtBwABmgv-gC0a2YpaNy08ZIuZqAlRj9jjnNeEtZ2WC_b5tFri76EMG1uw-maT9fHqVfUFYz0OK0x2rL5jiGlT2clX5RypLLs0VTFcVz_KrBum6lNMaE_YUbBjxic3-Zj9evvm59n7evn13Yez02XtOslL3fVBQ3CgWukBtApOe6-1V65dYeflSljVOWx4r8HZlQySB-ddz4lGhV4cs-cH322KFzvMxWyG7HAc7YRxl00PvWo63d4LCsUbLoUm8Nk_4DpSm9SEodH2IPW1mzhALsWcEwazTTS4tDcNmHkR5o5FkOrjQZVwi-5WUmxYe7ykly6NsG1Dx56ChB2lYb5SbOfccsN7MOdlQ2b6YDZM81bsn5hGT177MaaQ7OSGfNcnTLkqpH19r1b8r5O_Z8K4OA</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Hundt, David</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</title><author>Hundt, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-56f90fc0847d0098fc9dd99d8c4be5d7b3a85ce12690cab7f72fcdc62d00e8ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Development studies</topic><topic>East Asia</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Policy Implementation</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>State Power</topic><topic>State Role</topic><topic>World economy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of development studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hundt, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of development studies</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>242-260</pages><issn>0022-0388</issn><eissn>1743-9140</eissn><coden>JDVSA9</coden><abstract>This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0022038042000309232</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0388
ispartof The Journal of development studies, 2005-02, Vol.41 (2), p.242-260
issn 0022-0388
1743-9140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38212739
source RePEc; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Development studies
East Asia
Economic Crises
Economic crisis
Economic Development
Economic policy
Economic reform
Korea
Liberalism
Neoliberalism
Policy Implementation
Political economy
Reform
Regional studies
South Korea
State
State Power
State Role
World economy
title A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A02%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_repec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Legitimate%20Paradox:%20Neo-liberal%20Reform%20and%20the%20Return%20of%20the%20State%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20development%20studies&rft.au=Hundt,%20David&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=242-260&rft.issn=0022-0388&rft.eissn=1743-9140&rft.coden=JDVSA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0022038042000309232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_repec%3E38212739%3C/proquest_repec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220607994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true