A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea
This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a col...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of development studies 2005-02, Vol.41 (2), p.242-260 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 242 |
container_title | The Journal of development studies |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Hundt, David |
description | This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0022038042000309232 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_repec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38212739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38212739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-56f90fc0847d0098fc9dd99d8c4be5d7b3a85ce12690cab7f72fcdc62d00e8ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1EJZaWX8Al4sAtMLGT2OaAVFV8Lx_i42x57THNKhtvbW_p_nsm3aoHVNHDeDzS8772zDD2tIEXDSh4CcA5CAUtBwABmgv-gC0a2YpaNy08ZIuZqAlRj9jjnNeEtZ2WC_b5tFri76EMG1uw-maT9fHqVfUFYz0OK0x2rL5jiGlT2clX5RypLLs0VTFcVz_KrBum6lNMaE_YUbBjxic3-Zj9evvm59n7evn13Yez02XtOslL3fVBQ3CgWukBtApOe6-1V65dYeflSljVOWx4r8HZlQySB-ddz4lGhV4cs-cH322KFzvMxWyG7HAc7YRxl00PvWo63d4LCsUbLoUm8Nk_4DpSm9SEodH2IPW1mzhALsWcEwazTTS4tDcNmHkR5o5FkOrjQZVwi-5WUmxYe7ykly6NsG1Dx56ChB2lYb5SbOfccsN7MOdlQ2b6YDZM81bsn5hGT177MaaQ7OSGfNcnTLkqpH19r1b8r5O_Z8K4OA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220607994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hundt, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0022038042000309232</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDVSA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Development studies ; East Asia ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Economic Development ; Economic policy ; Economic reform ; Korea ; Liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Policy Implementation ; Political economy ; Reform ; Regional studies ; South Korea ; State ; State Power ; State Role ; World economy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of development studies, 2005-02, Vol.41 (2), p.242-260</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright Frank Cass & Co. Ltd Feb 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-56f90fc0847d0098fc9dd99d8c4be5d7b3a85ce12690cab7f72fcdc62d00e8ed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3996,27911,27912,33761</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tafjdevst/v_3a41_3ay_3a2005_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a242-260.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><title>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</title><title>The Journal of development studies</title><description>This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.</description><subject>Development studies</subject><subject>East Asia</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Policy Implementation</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>State Power</subject><subject>State Role</subject><subject>World economy</subject><issn>0022-0388</issn><issn>1743-9140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1EJZaWX8Al4sAtMLGT2OaAVFV8Lx_i42x57THNKhtvbW_p_nsm3aoHVNHDeDzS8772zDD2tIEXDSh4CcA5CAUtBwABmgv-gC0a2YpaNy08ZIuZqAlRj9jjnNeEtZ2WC_b5tFri76EMG1uw-maT9fHqVfUFYz0OK0x2rL5jiGlT2clX5RypLLs0VTFcVz_KrBum6lNMaE_YUbBjxic3-Zj9evvm59n7evn13Yez02XtOslL3fVBQ3CgWukBtApOe6-1V65dYeflSljVOWx4r8HZlQySB-ddz4lGhV4cs-cH322KFzvMxWyG7HAc7YRxl00PvWo63d4LCsUbLoUm8Nk_4DpSm9SEodH2IPW1mzhALsWcEwazTTS4tDcNmHkR5o5FkOrjQZVwi-5WUmxYe7ykly6NsG1Dx56ChB2lYb5SbOfccsN7MOdlQ2b6YDZM81bsn5hGT177MaaQ7OSGfNcnTLkqpH19r1b8r5O_Z8K4OA</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Hundt, David</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</title><author>Hundt, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-56f90fc0847d0098fc9dd99d8c4be5d7b3a85ce12690cab7f72fcdc62d00e8ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Development studies</topic><topic>East Asia</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Policy Implementation</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>State Power</topic><topic>State Role</topic><topic>World economy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hundt, David</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of development studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hundt, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of development studies</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>242-260</pages><issn>0022-0388</issn><eissn>1743-9140</eissn><coden>JDVSA9</coden><abstract>This article examines the neo-liberal reforms that the Kim government implemented in post-crisis Korea. It argues that by embracing the reforms, the state, paradoxically, re-legitimised itself in the national political economy. The process of enacting the reforms completed the power shift from a collusive state-chaebol alliance towards a new alliance based on a more populist social contract - but one that nonetheless generally conformed to the tenets of neo-liberalism. Kim and his closest associates identified the malpractices of the chaebols as the main cause of the crisis, so reforming the chaebols would be the key to economic recovery. Combining populism and neo-liberalism, they drew on support from both domestic and international sources to rein in, rather than nurture, the chaebols.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0022038042000309232</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0388 |
ispartof | The Journal of development studies, 2005-02, Vol.41 (2), p.242-260 |
issn | 0022-0388 1743-9140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38212739 |
source | RePEc; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Development studies East Asia Economic Crises Economic crisis Economic Development Economic policy Economic reform Korea Liberalism Neoliberalism Policy Implementation Political economy Reform Regional studies South Korea State State Power State Role World economy |
title | A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A02%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_repec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Legitimate%20Paradox:%20Neo-liberal%20Reform%20and%20the%20Return%20of%20the%20State%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20development%20studies&rft.au=Hundt,%20David&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=242-260&rft.issn=0022-0388&rft.eissn=1743-9140&rft.coden=JDVSA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0022038042000309232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_repec%3E38212739%3C/proquest_repec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220607994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |