The Role of Dynamic Scoring in the Federal Budget Process: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice
This paper discusses several issues that arise in the process of analyzing the macroeconomic effects of tax policy proposals in a way that is of practical use to legislators. In the current federal legislative process, much of the economic analysis of tax legislation boils down to a single set of nu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 2005-05, Vol.95 (2), p.432-436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 432 |
container_title | The American economic review |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Altshuler, Rosanne Nicholas Bull John Diamond Tim Dowd Pamela Moomau |
description | This paper discusses several issues that arise in the process of analyzing the macroeconomic effects of tax policy proposals in a way that is of practical use to legislators. In the current federal legislative process, much of the economic analysis of tax legislation boils down to a single set of numbers: an estimate of the effects of the proposal on projected federal revenues over the ten-year period following the current fiscal year. The authors discuss some of the practical aspects of developing a methodology for "dynamic scoring" or accounting for potential macroeconomic effects in the estimate of the revenue costs of a specific tax proposal. The authors discuss often-overlooked practical issues in incorporating those effects in a revenue estimate. The authors also show how the effects of proposed tax changes on GDP and revenues can vary depending on the methodologies chosen to address each of these issues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/000282805774669754 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38211932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4132860</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4132860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-4735c6e21146f81a33f1dc21eb9af664084a76181e08e568cd2fa87f4ef9be8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0E9LwzAYBvAgCs7pFxAPwYO3av41Sb3pdCoMFJ3nkqVvZkfXzKRF9u1NmXjQU3jJ73l4eRE6peSSslxdEUKYZprkSgkpC5WLPTSihRCZKjTdR6MBZEmwQ3QU44oMM1Uj5OYfgF99A9g7fLdtzbq2-M36ULdLXLe4S99TqCCYBt_21RI6_BK8hRiv8aTxcWCDeTAbvIDuC6DFqdKHLTZtlayxXW3hGB0400Q4-XnH6H16P588ZrPnh6fJzSyzXOsuE4rnVgKjVEinqeHc0coyCovCOCkF0cIoSTUFoiGX2lbMGa2cAFcsQDs-Rhe73k3wnz3ErlzX0ULTmBZ8H0uuU3fBWYLnf-DK96FNu5WMc8IKKWRCbIds8DEGcOUm1GsTtiUl5XD38v_dU-hsF1rFzoffhKCcaUn4Nzl0fS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233029646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Dynamic Scoring in the Federal Budget Process: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Altshuler, Rosanne ; Nicholas Bull ; John Diamond ; Tim Dowd ; Pamela Moomau</creator><creatorcontrib>Altshuler, Rosanne ; Nicholas Bull ; John Diamond ; Tim Dowd ; Pamela Moomau</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses several issues that arise in the process of analyzing the macroeconomic effects of tax policy proposals in a way that is of practical use to legislators. In the current federal legislative process, much of the economic analysis of tax legislation boils down to a single set of numbers: an estimate of the effects of the proposal on projected federal revenues over the ten-year period following the current fiscal year. The authors discuss some of the practical aspects of developing a methodology for "dynamic scoring" or accounting for potential macroeconomic effects in the estimate of the revenue costs of a specific tax proposal. The authors discuss often-overlooked practical issues in incorporating those effects in a revenue estimate. The authors also show how the effects of proposed tax changes on GDP and revenues can vary depending on the methodologies chosen to address each of these issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/000282805774669754</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Aggregate analysis ; Aggregates ; Average tax rate ; Disposable income ; Dynamic models ; Dynamic Scoring ; Economic development ; Economic forecasting ; Economic theory ; Estimated taxes ; Federal budget ; Fiscal policy ; GDP ; GNP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Gross National Product ; Income taxes ; Internal Revenue Code ; Labor supply ; Macroeconomic modeling ; Macroeconomics ; Marginal tax rate ; Modeling ; Policy analysis ; Proposals ; Public finance ; Simulation ; Studies ; Tax policy ; Tax rates ; Tax returns ; Tax systems ; Taxable income ; Taxpayers ; Taxpaying ; U.S.A ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2005-05, Vol.95 (2), p.432-436</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998-2005 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association May 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-4735c6e21146f81a33f1dc21eb9af664084a76181e08e568cd2fa87f4ef9be8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-4735c6e21146f81a33f1dc21eb9af664084a76181e08e568cd2fa87f4ef9be8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4132860$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4132860$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,3737,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altshuler, Rosanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas Bull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John Diamond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tim Dowd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamela Moomau</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Dynamic Scoring in the Federal Budget Process: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>This paper discusses several issues that arise in the process of analyzing the macroeconomic effects of tax policy proposals in a way that is of practical use to legislators. In the current federal legislative process, much of the economic analysis of tax legislation boils down to a single set of numbers: an estimate of the effects of the proposal on projected federal revenues over the ten-year period following the current fiscal year. The authors discuss some of the practical aspects of developing a methodology for "dynamic scoring" or accounting for potential macroeconomic effects in the estimate of the revenue costs of a specific tax proposal. The authors discuss often-overlooked practical issues in incorporating those effects in a revenue estimate. The authors also show how the effects of proposed tax changes on GDP and revenues can vary depending on the methodologies chosen to address each of these issues.</description><subject>Aggregate analysis</subject><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Average tax rate</subject><subject>Disposable income</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Dynamic Scoring</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic forecasting</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Estimated taxes</subject><subject>Federal budget</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>GNP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Gross National Product</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Internal Revenue Code</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Macroeconomic modeling</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Marginal tax rate</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax returns</subject><subject>Tax systems</subject><subject>Taxable income</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><subject>Taxpaying</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0E9LwzAYBvAgCs7pFxAPwYO3av41Sb3pdCoMFJ3nkqVvZkfXzKRF9u1NmXjQU3jJ73l4eRE6peSSslxdEUKYZprkSgkpC5WLPTSihRCZKjTdR6MBZEmwQ3QU44oMM1Uj5OYfgF99A9g7fLdtzbq2-M36ULdLXLe4S99TqCCYBt_21RI6_BK8hRiv8aTxcWCDeTAbvIDuC6DFqdKHLTZtlayxXW3hGB0400Q4-XnH6H16P588ZrPnh6fJzSyzXOsuE4rnVgKjVEinqeHc0coyCovCOCkF0cIoSTUFoiGX2lbMGa2cAFcsQDs-Rhe73k3wnz3ErlzX0ULTmBZ8H0uuU3fBWYLnf-DK96FNu5WMc8IKKWRCbIds8DEGcOUm1GsTtiUl5XD38v_dU-hsF1rFzoffhKCcaUn4Nzl0fS0</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Altshuler, Rosanne</creator><creator>Nicholas Bull</creator><creator>John Diamond</creator><creator>Tim Dowd</creator><creator>Pamela Moomau</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>The Role of Dynamic Scoring in the Federal Budget Process: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice</title><author>Altshuler, Rosanne ; Nicholas Bull ; John Diamond ; Tim Dowd ; Pamela Moomau</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-4735c6e21146f81a33f1dc21eb9af664084a76181e08e568cd2fa87f4ef9be8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aggregate analysis</topic><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Average tax rate</topic><topic>Disposable income</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Dynamic Scoring</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic forecasting</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Estimated taxes</topic><topic>Federal budget</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>GNP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Gross National Product</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Internal Revenue Code</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Macroeconomic modeling</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Marginal tax rate</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax returns</topic><topic>Tax systems</topic><topic>Taxable income</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><topic>Taxpaying</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altshuler, Rosanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas Bull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John Diamond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tim Dowd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamela Moomau</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altshuler, Rosanne</au><au>Nicholas Bull</au><au>John Diamond</au><au>Tim Dowd</au><au>Pamela Moomau</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Dynamic Scoring in the Federal Budget Process: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>432-436</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>This paper discusses several issues that arise in the process of analyzing the macroeconomic effects of tax policy proposals in a way that is of practical use to legislators. In the current federal legislative process, much of the economic analysis of tax legislation boils down to a single set of numbers: an estimate of the effects of the proposal on projected federal revenues over the ten-year period following the current fiscal year. The authors discuss some of the practical aspects of developing a methodology for "dynamic scoring" or accounting for potential macroeconomic effects in the estimate of the revenue costs of a specific tax proposal. The authors discuss often-overlooked practical issues in incorporating those effects in a revenue estimate. The authors also show how the effects of proposed tax changes on GDP and revenues can vary depending on the methodologies chosen to address each of these issues.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/000282805774669754</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
ispartof | The American economic review, 2005-05, Vol.95 (2), p.432-436 |
issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38211932 |
source | Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; American Economic Association Web |
subjects | Aggregate analysis Aggregates Average tax rate Disposable income Dynamic models Dynamic Scoring Economic development Economic forecasting Economic theory Estimated taxes Federal budget Fiscal policy GDP GNP Gross Domestic Product Gross National Product Income taxes Internal Revenue Code Labor supply Macroeconomic modeling Macroeconomics Marginal tax rate Modeling Policy analysis Proposals Public finance Simulation Studies Tax policy Tax rates Tax returns Tax systems Taxable income Taxpayers Taxpaying U.S.A Wages & salaries |
title | The Role of Dynamic Scoring in the Federal Budget Process: Closing the Gap between Theory and Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A12%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Dynamic%20Scoring%20in%20the%20Federal%20Budget%20Process:%20Closing%20the%20Gap%20between%20Theory%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Altshuler,%20Rosanne&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=432-436&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/000282805774669754&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4132860%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233029646&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4132860&rfr_iscdi=true |