Conservative perspectives on American federalism

Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Publius 2004-10, Vol.34 (4), p.1-7
1. Verfasser: Hendrickson, Kimberly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Publius
container_volume 34
creator Hendrickson, Kimberly
description Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38207243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38207243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-3abe720dbd94d6ee83d273624a7a6816db48e90dad520fc8edfea18002fc2a043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLtqAzEQAFU4EMfJP1yV7mCt1elRmsN5gCGNe7MnreDCvaK1_f3BOB-QaqYYZqXWAMbXTWjgUT2JfAMABu_WCtp5Ei5XOvdXrhYusnC8uVTzVO1GLn2kqcqcuNDQy_isHjINwi9_3Kjj2_7YftSHr_fPdneoF6uxRurYaUhdCiZZZo9JO7TakCPrtzZ1xnOARKnRkKPnlJm2HkDnqAkMbtTrfbuU-efCcj6NvUQeBpp4vsgJvQanDf4rNBgM_gLMak4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38204394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><description>Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Banfield, Edward ; Buchanan, James ; Civil rights ; Communitarianism ; Conservatism ; Criticism ; Federalism ; Government structure ; Individual rights ; Kirk, Russell ; Meyer, Frank ; Morley, Felix ; Natural rights ; Nisbet, Robert ; Political opposition ; Political science ; Political thought ; Relations between the powers ; Riker, William H ; Self-government ; State structure ; Sutherland, George ; U.S.A ; Weaver, Richard</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2004-10, Vol.34 (4), p.1-7</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><title>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</title><title>Publius</title><description>Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius</description><subject>Banfield, Edward</subject><subject>Buchanan, James</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Communitarianism</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Government structure</subject><subject>Individual rights</subject><subject>Kirk, Russell</subject><subject>Meyer, Frank</subject><subject>Morley, Felix</subject><subject>Natural rights</subject><subject>Nisbet, Robert</subject><subject>Political opposition</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political thought</subject><subject>Relations between the powers</subject><subject>Riker, William H</subject><subject>Self-government</subject><subject>State structure</subject><subject>Sutherland, George</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Weaver, Richard</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjLtqAzEQAFU4EMfJP1yV7mCt1elRmsN5gCGNe7MnreDCvaK1_f3BOB-QaqYYZqXWAMbXTWjgUT2JfAMABu_WCtp5Ei5XOvdXrhYusnC8uVTzVO1GLn2kqcqcuNDQy_isHjINwi9_3Kjj2_7YftSHr_fPdneoF6uxRurYaUhdCiZZZo9JO7TakCPrtzZ1xnOARKnRkKPnlJm2HkDnqAkMbtTrfbuU-efCcj6NvUQeBpp4vsgJvQanDf4rNBgM_gLMak4k</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</title><author>Hendrickson, Kimberly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-3abe720dbd94d6ee83d273624a7a6816db48e90dad520fc8edfea18002fc2a043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Banfield, Edward</topic><topic>Buchanan, James</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Communitarianism</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Government structure</topic><topic>Individual rights</topic><topic>Kirk, Russell</topic><topic>Meyer, Frank</topic><topic>Morley, Felix</topic><topic>Natural rights</topic><topic>Nisbet, Robert</topic><topic>Political opposition</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political thought</topic><topic>Relations between the powers</topic><topic>Riker, William H</topic><topic>Self-government</topic><topic>State structure</topic><topic>Sutherland, George</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Weaver, Richard</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendrickson, Kimberly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><abstract>Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius</abstract><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5950
ispartof Publius, 2004-10, Vol.34 (4), p.1-7
issn 0048-5950
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38207243
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Banfield, Edward
Buchanan, James
Civil rights
Communitarianism
Conservatism
Criticism
Federalism
Government structure
Individual rights
Kirk, Russell
Meyer, Frank
Morley, Felix
Natural rights
Nisbet, Robert
Political opposition
Political science
Political thought
Relations between the powers
Riker, William H
Self-government
State structure
Sutherland, George
U.S.A
Weaver, Richard
title Conservative perspectives on American federalism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A15%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservative%20perspectives%20on%20American%20federalism&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Hendrickson,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E38207243%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38204394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true