Conservative perspectives on American federalism
Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Publius 2004-10, Vol.34 (4), p.1-7 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Publius |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Hendrickson, Kimberly |
description | Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38207243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38207243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-3abe720dbd94d6ee83d273624a7a6816db48e90dad520fc8edfea18002fc2a043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLtqAzEQAFU4EMfJP1yV7mCt1elRmsN5gCGNe7MnreDCvaK1_f3BOB-QaqYYZqXWAMbXTWjgUT2JfAMABu_WCtp5Ei5XOvdXrhYusnC8uVTzVO1GLn2kqcqcuNDQy_isHjINwi9_3Kjj2_7YftSHr_fPdneoF6uxRurYaUhdCiZZZo9JO7TakCPrtzZ1xnOARKnRkKPnlJm2HkDnqAkMbtTrfbuU-efCcj6NvUQeBpp4vsgJvQanDf4rNBgM_gLMak4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38204394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><description>Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Banfield, Edward ; Buchanan, James ; Civil rights ; Communitarianism ; Conservatism ; Criticism ; Federalism ; Government structure ; Individual rights ; Kirk, Russell ; Meyer, Frank ; Morley, Felix ; Natural rights ; Nisbet, Robert ; Political opposition ; Political science ; Political thought ; Relations between the powers ; Riker, William H ; Self-government ; State structure ; Sutherland, George ; U.S.A ; Weaver, Richard</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2004-10, Vol.34 (4), p.1-7</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><title>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</title><title>Publius</title><description>Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius</description><subject>Banfield, Edward</subject><subject>Buchanan, James</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Communitarianism</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Government structure</subject><subject>Individual rights</subject><subject>Kirk, Russell</subject><subject>Meyer, Frank</subject><subject>Morley, Felix</subject><subject>Natural rights</subject><subject>Nisbet, Robert</subject><subject>Political opposition</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political thought</subject><subject>Relations between the powers</subject><subject>Riker, William H</subject><subject>Self-government</subject><subject>State structure</subject><subject>Sutherland, George</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Weaver, Richard</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjLtqAzEQAFU4EMfJP1yV7mCt1elRmsN5gCGNe7MnreDCvaK1_f3BOB-QaqYYZqXWAMbXTWjgUT2JfAMABu_WCtp5Ei5XOvdXrhYusnC8uVTzVO1GLn2kqcqcuNDQy_isHjINwi9_3Kjj2_7YftSHr_fPdneoF6uxRurYaUhdCiZZZo9JO7TakCPrtzZ1xnOARKnRkKPnlJm2HkDnqAkMbtTrfbuU-efCcj6NvUQeBpp4vsgJvQanDf4rNBgM_gLMak4k</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</title><author>Hendrickson, Kimberly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-3abe720dbd94d6ee83d273624a7a6816db48e90dad520fc8edfea18002fc2a043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Banfield, Edward</topic><topic>Buchanan, James</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Communitarianism</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Government structure</topic><topic>Individual rights</topic><topic>Kirk, Russell</topic><topic>Meyer, Frank</topic><topic>Morley, Felix</topic><topic>Natural rights</topic><topic>Nisbet, Robert</topic><topic>Political opposition</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political thought</topic><topic>Relations between the powers</topic><topic>Riker, William H</topic><topic>Self-government</topic><topic>State structure</topic><topic>Sutherland, George</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Weaver, Richard</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendrickson, Kimberly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservative perspectives on American federalism</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><abstract>Conservatives were regularly criticized by liberals and others for their approach to federalism throughout the twentieth century. This trend began during the Progressive era, when the justices of the `Lochner Court' were vilified for using national judicial power to strike down local regulations. Several decades later, conservative opposition to New Deal programs was seen as insensitive and elitist. Arguments for constitutional limitations on executive power in the 1930s were attributed to the greed of businessmen and corporations. During the 1950s and 1960s, the conservative defense of states' rights was explained by other unpleasant motivations. Opposition to national civil rights laws was, for many, analogous to fondness for Jim Crow and other forms of racial subjugation. Since the 1980s, conservative members of the Rehnquist Court have been denounced from various quarters for their federalist perspectives. According to the Court's critics, specious arguments about state sovereignty have been used to rescind national rights and benefits. Reprinted by permission of CFS Associates: Publius</abstract><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-5950 |
ispartof | Publius, 2004-10, Vol.34 (4), p.1-7 |
issn | 0048-5950 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38207243 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Banfield, Edward Buchanan, James Civil rights Communitarianism Conservatism Criticism Federalism Government structure Individual rights Kirk, Russell Meyer, Frank Morley, Felix Natural rights Nisbet, Robert Political opposition Political science Political thought Relations between the powers Riker, William H Self-government State structure Sutherland, George U.S.A Weaver, Richard |
title | Conservative perspectives on American federalism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A15%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservative%20perspectives%20on%20American%20federalism&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Hendrickson,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E38207243%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38204394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |