Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees

Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental acco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary accounting research 2005-06, Vol.22 (2), p.409-447
Hauptverfasser: JACKSON, SCOTT B., SHOEMAKER, PAUL A., BARRICK, JOHN A., BURTON, F. GREG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 447
container_issue 2
container_start_page 409
container_title Contemporary accounting research
container_volume 22
creator JACKSON, SCOTT B.
SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.
BARRICK, JOHN A.
BURTON, F. GREG
description Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.
doi_str_mv 10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38164891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38164891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtu2zAUQImiAeIm-YIsQod2YsL3YyoCw3LedQw7fSwEI10BSm3JIWXE_vtQUNEhUydegOeQFwehU0rOqCTqfLnkEzzjv3I8-2lzvLCL_AMaUUsp5kaoj2hEDOPYJvgQfYrxmRCihDYj9G3hdxu_hxC_ZrMAaVxD02WzNtZd3TYx802ZJSabQ7cNzcAE399lOUA8RgeVX0U4-XseoWU-WYwv8e336dX44hYXggmGpZBCGFvIQltWlrqoyBNRVWklU6wUoK3gXmkGVWUqKbxUVLInLUsLUBqj-BH6Mry7Ce3LFmLn1nUsYLXyDbTb6LihKn1AE_j5HfjcpsXTbo5awSg32iaID1AR2hgDVG4T6rUPe0eJ64u6vqjri7q-qOuLJksP1mu9gv3_KG58MZ9Ylkw8mHXsYPfP9OGPU5pr6X7cT93d74fHm-vpvXvkb4Tiiuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194213879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>JACKSON, SCOTT B. ; SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. ; BARRICK, JOHN A. ; BURTON, F. GREG</creator><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, SCOTT B. ; SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. ; BARRICK, JOHN A. ; BURTON, F. GREG</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0823-9150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-3846</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountants ; Accounting theory ; Costs ; Data analysis ; Empirical research ; Income tax ; Individual behaviour ; Mental accounting ; Prepayment position ; Prepayments ; Professional fees ; Prospect theory ; Public economics ; Public finance ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Tax collection ; Tax deductions ; Tax overpayment ; Tax refunds ; Tax return preparation fees ; Tax returns ; Tax systems ; Taxpayers ; Theory ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Contemporary accounting research, 2005-06, Vol.22 (2), p.409-447</ispartof><rights>2005 Canadian Academic Accounting Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Academic Accounting Association Summer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1506%2FUU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1506%2FUU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRICK, JOHN A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURTON, F. GREG</creatorcontrib><title>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</title><title>Contemporary accounting research</title><description>Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.</description><subject>Accountants</subject><subject>Accounting theory</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Income tax</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Mental accounting</subject><subject>Prepayment position</subject><subject>Prepayments</subject><subject>Professional fees</subject><subject>Prospect theory</subject><subject>Public economics</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax collection</subject><subject>Tax deductions</subject><subject>Tax overpayment</subject><subject>Tax refunds</subject><subject>Tax return preparation fees</subject><subject>Tax returns</subject><subject>Tax systems</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0823-9150</issn><issn>1911-3846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtu2zAUQImiAeIm-YIsQod2YsL3YyoCw3LedQw7fSwEI10BSm3JIWXE_vtQUNEhUydegOeQFwehU0rOqCTqfLnkEzzjv3I8-2lzvLCL_AMaUUsp5kaoj2hEDOPYJvgQfYrxmRCihDYj9G3hdxu_hxC_ZrMAaVxD02WzNtZd3TYx802ZJSabQ7cNzcAE399lOUA8RgeVX0U4-XseoWU-WYwv8e336dX44hYXggmGpZBCGFvIQltWlrqoyBNRVWklU6wUoK3gXmkGVWUqKbxUVLInLUsLUBqj-BH6Mry7Ce3LFmLn1nUsYLXyDbTb6LihKn1AE_j5HfjcpsXTbo5awSg32iaID1AR2hgDVG4T6rUPe0eJ64u6vqjri7q-qOuLJksP1mu9gv3_KG58MZ9Ylkw8mHXsYPfP9OGPU5pr6X7cT93d74fHm-vpvXvkb4Tiiuc</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</creator><creator>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</creator><creator>BARRICK, JOHN A.</creator><creator>BURTON, F. GREG</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Canadian Academic Accounting Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</title><author>JACKSON, SCOTT B. ; SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. ; BARRICK, JOHN A. ; BURTON, F. GREG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accountants</topic><topic>Accounting theory</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Income tax</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Mental accounting</topic><topic>Prepayment position</topic><topic>Prepayments</topic><topic>Professional fees</topic><topic>Prospect theory</topic><topic>Public economics</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax collection</topic><topic>Tax deductions</topic><topic>Tax overpayment</topic><topic>Tax refunds</topic><topic>Tax return preparation fees</topic><topic>Tax returns</topic><topic>Tax systems</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRICK, JOHN A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURTON, F. GREG</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Contemporary accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</au><au>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</au><au>BARRICK, JOHN A.</au><au>BURTON, F. GREG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary accounting research</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>409-447</pages><issn>0823-9150</issn><eissn>1911-3846</eissn><abstract>Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0823-9150
ispartof Contemporary accounting research, 2005-06, Vol.22 (2), p.409-447
issn 0823-9150
1911-3846
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38164891
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Accountants
Accounting theory
Costs
Data analysis
Empirical research
Income tax
Individual behaviour
Mental accounting
Prepayment position
Prepayments
Professional fees
Prospect theory
Public economics
Public finance
Regression analysis
Studies
Tax collection
Tax deductions
Tax overpayment
Tax refunds
Tax return preparation fees
Tax returns
Tax systems
Taxpayers
Theory
U.S.A
title Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A24%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taxpayers'%20Prepayment%20Positions%20and%20Tax%20Return%20Preparation%20Fees&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20accounting%20research&rft.au=JACKSON,%20SCOTT%20B.&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=409-447&rft.issn=0823-9150&rft.eissn=1911-3846&rft_id=info:doi/10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38164891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194213879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true