Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees
Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental acco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary accounting research 2005-06, Vol.22 (2), p.409-447 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 447 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 409 |
container_title | Contemporary accounting research |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | JACKSON, SCOTT B. SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. BARRICK, JOHN A. BURTON, F. GREG |
description | Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38164891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38164891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtu2zAUQImiAeIm-YIsQod2YsL3YyoCw3LedQw7fSwEI10BSm3JIWXE_vtQUNEhUydegOeQFwehU0rOqCTqfLnkEzzjv3I8-2lzvLCL_AMaUUsp5kaoj2hEDOPYJvgQfYrxmRCihDYj9G3hdxu_hxC_ZrMAaVxD02WzNtZd3TYx802ZJSabQ7cNzcAE399lOUA8RgeVX0U4-XseoWU-WYwv8e336dX44hYXggmGpZBCGFvIQltWlrqoyBNRVWklU6wUoK3gXmkGVWUqKbxUVLInLUsLUBqj-BH6Mry7Ce3LFmLn1nUsYLXyDbTb6LihKn1AE_j5HfjcpsXTbo5awSg32iaID1AR2hgDVG4T6rUPe0eJ64u6vqjri7q-qOuLJksP1mu9gv3_KG58MZ9Ylkw8mHXsYPfP9OGPU5pr6X7cT93d74fHm-vpvXvkb4Tiiuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194213879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>JACKSON, SCOTT B. ; SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. ; BARRICK, JOHN A. ; BURTON, F. GREG</creator><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, SCOTT B. ; SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. ; BARRICK, JOHN A. ; BURTON, F. GREG</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0823-9150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-3846</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountants ; Accounting theory ; Costs ; Data analysis ; Empirical research ; Income tax ; Individual behaviour ; Mental accounting ; Prepayment position ; Prepayments ; Professional fees ; Prospect theory ; Public economics ; Public finance ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Tax collection ; Tax deductions ; Tax overpayment ; Tax refunds ; Tax return preparation fees ; Tax returns ; Tax systems ; Taxpayers ; Theory ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Contemporary accounting research, 2005-06, Vol.22 (2), p.409-447</ispartof><rights>2005 Canadian Academic Accounting Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Academic Accounting Association Summer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1506%2FUU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1506%2FUU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRICK, JOHN A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURTON, F. GREG</creatorcontrib><title>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</title><title>Contemporary accounting research</title><description>Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.</description><subject>Accountants</subject><subject>Accounting theory</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Income tax</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Mental accounting</subject><subject>Prepayment position</subject><subject>Prepayments</subject><subject>Professional fees</subject><subject>Prospect theory</subject><subject>Public economics</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax collection</subject><subject>Tax deductions</subject><subject>Tax overpayment</subject><subject>Tax refunds</subject><subject>Tax return preparation fees</subject><subject>Tax returns</subject><subject>Tax systems</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0823-9150</issn><issn>1911-3846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtu2zAUQImiAeIm-YIsQod2YsL3YyoCw3LedQw7fSwEI10BSm3JIWXE_vtQUNEhUydegOeQFwehU0rOqCTqfLnkEzzjv3I8-2lzvLCL_AMaUUsp5kaoj2hEDOPYJvgQfYrxmRCihDYj9G3hdxu_hxC_ZrMAaVxD02WzNtZd3TYx802ZJSabQ7cNzcAE399lOUA8RgeVX0U4-XseoWU-WYwv8e336dX44hYXggmGpZBCGFvIQltWlrqoyBNRVWklU6wUoK3gXmkGVWUqKbxUVLInLUsLUBqj-BH6Mry7Ce3LFmLn1nUsYLXyDbTb6LihKn1AE_j5HfjcpsXTbo5awSg32iaID1AR2hgDVG4T6rUPe0eJ64u6vqjri7q-qOuLJksP1mu9gv3_KG58MZ9Ylkw8mHXsYPfP9OGPU5pr6X7cT93d74fHm-vpvXvkb4Tiiuc</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</creator><creator>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</creator><creator>BARRICK, JOHN A.</creator><creator>BURTON, F. GREG</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Canadian Academic Accounting Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</title><author>JACKSON, SCOTT B. ; SHOEMAKER, PAUL A. ; BARRICK, JOHN A. ; BURTON, F. GREG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4242-5454489c5c792dd7cf0b06fd95262d4e7943a672eff8f54a56152b75d9eed8863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accountants</topic><topic>Accounting theory</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Income tax</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Mental accounting</topic><topic>Prepayment position</topic><topic>Prepayments</topic><topic>Professional fees</topic><topic>Prospect theory</topic><topic>Public economics</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax collection</topic><topic>Tax deductions</topic><topic>Tax overpayment</topic><topic>Tax refunds</topic><topic>Tax return preparation fees</topic><topic>Tax returns</topic><topic>Tax systems</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRICK, JOHN A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURTON, F. GREG</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Contemporary accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JACKSON, SCOTT B.</au><au>SHOEMAKER, PAUL A.</au><au>BARRICK, JOHN A.</au><au>BURTON, F. GREG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary accounting research</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>409-447</pages><issn>0823-9150</issn><eissn>1911-3846</eissn><abstract>Individuals who have their tax returns professionally prepared often overpay estimated income taxes, effectively giving the government an interest‐free loan. To understand why tax professionals may place their clients in positive prepayment positions, we draw on mental accounting theory. Mental accounting theory suggests that by placing taxpayers in positive prepayment positions, tax professionals induce a favorable mental representation of tax return preparation fees, perhaps allowing them to collect larger fractions of billable time and costs incurred on taxpayers' behalves. Thus, we hypothesize that tax return preparation fees are higher for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions than for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions. Regression results using tax return data for 68,736 taxpayers provide strong support for this hypothesis. To more fully understand the general nature of the relationship between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees, we adapt the prospect theory value function to the tax domain and formulate three additional hypotheses. Consistent with theory, regression results indicate that the relation between taxpayers' prepayment positions and tax return preparation fees is (1) positive, (2) stronger for taxpayers who receive refunds that are less than fees than it is for taxpayers who receive refunds that are greater than fees, and (3) stronger for taxpayers in negative prepayment positions than for taxpayers in positive prepayment positions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0823-9150 |
ispartof | Contemporary accounting research, 2005-06, Vol.22 (2), p.409-447 |
issn | 0823-9150 1911-3846 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38164891 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Accountants Accounting theory Costs Data analysis Empirical research Income tax Individual behaviour Mental accounting Prepayment position Prepayments Professional fees Prospect theory Public economics Public finance Regression analysis Studies Tax collection Tax deductions Tax overpayment Tax refunds Tax return preparation fees Tax returns Tax systems Taxpayers Theory U.S.A |
title | Taxpayers' Prepayment Positions and Tax Return Preparation Fees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A24%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taxpayers'%20Prepayment%20Positions%20and%20Tax%20Return%20Preparation%20Fees&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20accounting%20research&rft.au=JACKSON,%20SCOTT%20B.&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=409-447&rft.issn=0823-9150&rft.eissn=1911-3846&rft_id=info:doi/10.1506/UU3E-P3YF-PX9F-T9TF&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38164891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194213879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |