What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?

This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical perspectives on accounting 2005-08, Vol.16 (6), p.787-796
1. Verfasser: Moriceau, Jean-Luc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 6
container_start_page 787
container_title Critical perspectives on accounting
container_volume 16
creator Moriceau, Jean-Luc
description This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38163468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1045235404000541</els_id><sourcerecordid>38163468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG_Fg7fWSdOkCR5EZP0DC14UjyGbTjW1m65Jq_jtzbKePHgYZuC9N8z8CDmlUFCg4qIr7MYUJQArQBYAao_MKCieK8X5_naueF4yXh2Soxg7AEorJWakfHkzY2aNz74w69EEn7VhWGcmi86_Tr0JSYxJcu-YLXwY_NUxOWhNH_Hkt8_J8-3i6eY-Xz7ePdxcL3Nb1jDmuMKGU1VTKpRltDZA1apBUVtsheJVa420sqmYTSXqRiHWJVa2BC5RMMbm5Hy3dxOGjwnjqNcuWux743GYomaSClYJmYxnf4zdMAWfbtMlExVTUkAy0Z3JhiHGgK3eBLc24VtT0FuEutMJod4i1CB1Qpgyl7sMpjc_HQYdrUNvsXEB7aibwf2T_gGFBnbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236439860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><description>This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Auditing ; Business accounting ; Business failures ; Case studies ; Energy industry ; Enron ; External validity ; Financial accounting ; Fraud ; Repetition ; Scandals ; Single case study ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 2005-08, Vol.16 (6), p.787-796</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><title>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.</description><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Business accounting</subject><subject>Business failures</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Enron</subject><subject>External validity</subject><subject>Financial accounting</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Single case study</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG_Fg7fWSdOkCR5EZP0DC14UjyGbTjW1m65Jq_jtzbKePHgYZuC9N8z8CDmlUFCg4qIr7MYUJQArQBYAao_MKCieK8X5_naueF4yXh2Soxg7AEorJWakfHkzY2aNz74w69EEn7VhWGcmi86_Tr0JSYxJcu-YLXwY_NUxOWhNH_Hkt8_J8-3i6eY-Xz7ePdxcL3Nb1jDmuMKGU1VTKpRltDZA1apBUVtsheJVa420sqmYTSXqRiHWJVa2BC5RMMbm5Hy3dxOGjwnjqNcuWux743GYomaSClYJmYxnf4zdMAWfbtMlExVTUkAy0Z3JhiHGgK3eBLc24VtT0FuEutMJod4i1CB1Qpgyl7sMpjc_HQYdrUNvsXEB7aibwf2T_gGFBnbo</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</title><author>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Business accounting</topic><topic>Business failures</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Enron</topic><topic>External validity</topic><topic>Financial accounting</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Single case study</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>787-796</pages><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-2354
ispartof Critical perspectives on accounting, 2005-08, Vol.16 (6), p.787-796
issn 1045-2354
1095-9955
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38163468
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Auditing
Business accounting
Business failures
Case studies
Energy industry
Enron
External validity
Financial accounting
Fraud
Repetition
Scandals
Single case study
Validity
title What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20can%20we%20learn%20from%20a%20singular%20case%20like%20Enron?&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Moriceau,%20Jean-Luc&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=787-796&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38163468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236439860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1045235404000541&rfr_iscdi=true