What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?
This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical perspectives on accounting 2005-08, Vol.16 (6), p.787-796 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | Critical perspectives on accounting |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Moriceau, Jean-Luc |
description | This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38163468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1045235404000541</els_id><sourcerecordid>38163468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG_Fg7fWSdOkCR5EZP0DC14UjyGbTjW1m65Jq_jtzbKePHgYZuC9N8z8CDmlUFCg4qIr7MYUJQArQBYAao_MKCieK8X5_naueF4yXh2Soxg7AEorJWakfHkzY2aNz74w69EEn7VhWGcmi86_Tr0JSYxJcu-YLXwY_NUxOWhNH_Hkt8_J8-3i6eY-Xz7ePdxcL3Nb1jDmuMKGU1VTKpRltDZA1apBUVtsheJVa420sqmYTSXqRiHWJVa2BC5RMMbm5Hy3dxOGjwnjqNcuWux743GYomaSClYJmYxnf4zdMAWfbtMlExVTUkAy0Z3JhiHGgK3eBLc24VtT0FuEutMJod4i1CB1Qpgyl7sMpjc_HQYdrUNvsXEB7aibwf2T_gGFBnbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236439860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><description>This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Auditing ; Business accounting ; Business failures ; Case studies ; Energy industry ; Enron ; External validity ; Financial accounting ; Fraud ; Repetition ; Scandals ; Single case study ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Critical perspectives on accounting, 2005-08, Vol.16 (6), p.787-796</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><title>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</title><title>Critical perspectives on accounting</title><description>This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.</description><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Business accounting</subject><subject>Business failures</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Enron</subject><subject>External validity</subject><subject>Financial accounting</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Single case study</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1045-2354</issn><issn>1095-9955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG_Fg7fWSdOkCR5EZP0DC14UjyGbTjW1m65Jq_jtzbKePHgYZuC9N8z8CDmlUFCg4qIr7MYUJQArQBYAao_MKCieK8X5_naueF4yXh2Soxg7AEorJWakfHkzY2aNz74w69EEn7VhWGcmi86_Tr0JSYxJcu-YLXwY_NUxOWhNH_Hkt8_J8-3i6eY-Xz7ePdxcL3Nb1jDmuMKGU1VTKpRltDZA1apBUVtsheJVa420sqmYTSXqRiHWJVa2BC5RMMbm5Hy3dxOGjwnjqNcuWux743GYomaSClYJmYxnf4zdMAWfbtMlExVTUkAy0Z3JhiHGgK3eBLc24VtT0FuEutMJod4i1CB1Qpgyl7sMpjc_HQYdrUNvsXEB7aibwf2T_gGFBnbo</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</title><author>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-ebed51971169c317a019bde67cef6954fca8c8d43cd4367d9ee72e4c2058e6333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Business accounting</topic><topic>Business failures</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Enron</topic><topic>External validity</topic><topic>Financial accounting</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Single case study</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moriceau, Jean-Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What can we learn from a singular case like Enron?</atitle><jtitle>Critical perspectives on accounting</jtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>787-796</pages><issn>1045-2354</issn><eissn>1095-9955</eissn><abstract>This story narratively contends that lessons to be learnt from Enron collapse far exceed punishments of illegal behaviors as well as some new auditing and accounting regulations. But this requires to convince the external validity of a singular case. Usual ways of claiming external validity doesn’t appear to suit this situation. Participants then try Deleuze’s concept of repetition and examines the insight this permits to gain on Enron possible lessons. This external validity criteria is finally discussed, still grounded on Enron case.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-2354 |
ispartof | Critical perspectives on accounting, 2005-08, Vol.16 (6), p.787-796 |
issn | 1045-2354 1095-9955 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38163468 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier) |
subjects | Auditing Business accounting Business failures Case studies Energy industry Enron External validity Financial accounting Fraud Repetition Scandals Single case study Validity |
title | What can we learn from a singular case like Enron? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20can%20we%20learn%20from%20a%20singular%20case%20like%20Enron?&rft.jtitle=Critical%20perspectives%20on%20accounting&rft.au=Moriceau,%20Jean-Luc&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=787-796&rft.issn=1045-2354&rft.eissn=1095-9955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38163468%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236439860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1045235404000541&rfr_iscdi=true |