Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics
Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to wha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business ethics quarterly 2005-04, Vol.15 (2), p.283-298 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 298 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | Business ethics quarterly |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Provis, Chris |
description | Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination." |
doi_str_mv | 10.5840/beq200515215 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38136813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3857681</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3857681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb4b25099904049042372506d499692ba769893c8b557e00f2ed28dd3d56ce083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs3jx4WD55cTTKbbHLUaluhWBWF4iVkd1NJ3W7aZAv23xtZKeJh3jDzPmaGQeiU4CsmMnxdmDXFmBFGCdtDvaiQAlC-j3oEM5oShmeH6CiEBcaESAE9RO-sb7fJWDdVSKIkE7fVdezYJpn6D93YoFvrGl0nT662rS3DMTqY6zqYk9_cR2_D-9fBOJ1MRw-Dm0laAqNtWhRZQRmWUuIMZ1Eo5LHmVSYll7TQOZdCQikKxnKD8Zyaioqqgorx0mABfXTRzV15t96Y0KqlDaWpa90YtwkKBAEeI4Ln_8CF2_h4clCUcABMaR6hyw4qvQvBm7laebvUfqsIVj_fU3-_F_GzDl-E1vkdC4LlPzv7KO1sG1rztbO1_1Q8h5wpPnpWt3Q0e3x_YWoI353Bd8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216330227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Provis, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Provis, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-3326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/beq200515215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aristotelean ethics ; Business ethics ; Business studies ; Friendship ; Individual behaviour ; Intragroup relations ; Moral judgment ; Morality ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Political attitudes ; Political ethics ; Political obligation ; Political philosophy ; Social relations ; Sociology of organizations ; Sociology of work ; Studies ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Business ethics quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.15 (2), p.283-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Society for Business Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright Loyola University of Chicago Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb4b25099904049042372506d499692ba769893c8b557e00f2ed28dd3d56ce083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3857681$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3857681$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Provis, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</title><title>Business ethics quarterly</title><description>Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."</description><subject>Aristotelean ethics</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Intragroup relations</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>Political obligation</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Sociology of work</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>1052-150X</issn><issn>2153-3326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs3jx4WD55cTTKbbHLUaluhWBWF4iVkd1NJ3W7aZAv23xtZKeJh3jDzPmaGQeiU4CsmMnxdmDXFmBFGCdtDvaiQAlC-j3oEM5oShmeH6CiEBcaESAE9RO-sb7fJWDdVSKIkE7fVdezYJpn6D93YoFvrGl0nT662rS3DMTqY6zqYk9_cR2_D-9fBOJ1MRw-Dm0laAqNtWhRZQRmWUuIMZ1Eo5LHmVSYll7TQOZdCQikKxnKD8Zyaioqqgorx0mABfXTRzV15t96Y0KqlDaWpa90YtwkKBAEeI4Ln_8CF2_h4clCUcABMaR6hyw4qvQvBm7laebvUfqsIVj_fU3-_F_GzDl-E1vkdC4LlPzv7KO1sG1rztbO1_1Q8h5wpPnpWt3Q0e3x_YWoI353Bd8w</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Provis, Chris</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Philosophical Documentation Center</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</title><author>Provis, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb4b25099904049042372506d499692ba769893c8b557e00f2ed28dd3d56ce083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aristotelean ethics</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Intragroup relations</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>Political obligation</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Sociology of work</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Provis, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Provis, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</atitle><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>283-298</pages><issn>1052-150X</issn><eissn>2153-3326</eissn><abstract>Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.5840/beq200515215</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-150X |
ispartof | Business ethics quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.15 (2), p.283-298 |
issn | 1052-150X 2153-3326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38136813 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Aristotelean ethics Business ethics Business studies Friendship Individual behaviour Intragroup relations Moral judgment Morality Organization theory Organizational behavior Political attitudes Political ethics Political obligation Political philosophy Social relations Sociology of organizations Sociology of work Studies Wisdom |
title | Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dirty%20Hands%20and%20Loyalty%20in%20Organisational%20Politics&rft.jtitle=Business%20ethics%20quarterly&rft.au=Provis,%20Chris&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=283-298&rft.issn=1052-150X&rft.eissn=2153-3326&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/beq200515215&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3857681%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216330227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3857681&rfr_iscdi=true |