Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics

Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to wha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business ethics quarterly 2005-04, Vol.15 (2), p.283-298
1. Verfasser: Provis, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 2
container_start_page 283
container_title Business ethics quarterly
container_volume 15
creator Provis, Chris
description Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."
doi_str_mv 10.5840/beq200515215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38136813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3857681</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3857681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb4b25099904049042372506d499692ba769893c8b557e00f2ed28dd3d56ce083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs3jx4WD55cTTKbbHLUaluhWBWF4iVkd1NJ3W7aZAv23xtZKeJh3jDzPmaGQeiU4CsmMnxdmDXFmBFGCdtDvaiQAlC-j3oEM5oShmeH6CiEBcaESAE9RO-sb7fJWDdVSKIkE7fVdezYJpn6D93YoFvrGl0nT662rS3DMTqY6zqYk9_cR2_D-9fBOJ1MRw-Dm0laAqNtWhRZQRmWUuIMZ1Eo5LHmVSYll7TQOZdCQikKxnKD8Zyaioqqgorx0mABfXTRzV15t96Y0KqlDaWpa90YtwkKBAEeI4Ln_8CF2_h4clCUcABMaR6hyw4qvQvBm7laebvUfqsIVj_fU3-_F_GzDl-E1vkdC4LlPzv7KO1sG1rztbO1_1Q8h5wpPnpWt3Q0e3x_YWoI353Bd8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216330227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Provis, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Provis, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-3326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/beq200515215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aristotelean ethics ; Business ethics ; Business studies ; Friendship ; Individual behaviour ; Intragroup relations ; Moral judgment ; Morality ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Political attitudes ; Political ethics ; Political obligation ; Political philosophy ; Social relations ; Sociology of organizations ; Sociology of work ; Studies ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Business ethics quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.15 (2), p.283-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Society for Business Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright Loyola University of Chicago Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb4b25099904049042372506d499692ba769893c8b557e00f2ed28dd3d56ce083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3857681$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3857681$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Provis, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</title><title>Business ethics quarterly</title><description>Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."</description><subject>Aristotelean ethics</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Intragroup relations</subject><subject>Moral judgment</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>Political obligation</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Sociology of work</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>1052-150X</issn><issn>2153-3326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFLAzEQhYMoWKs3jx4WD55cTTKbbHLUaluhWBWF4iVkd1NJ3W7aZAv23xtZKeJh3jDzPmaGQeiU4CsmMnxdmDXFmBFGCdtDvaiQAlC-j3oEM5oShmeH6CiEBcaESAE9RO-sb7fJWDdVSKIkE7fVdezYJpn6D93YoFvrGl0nT662rS3DMTqY6zqYk9_cR2_D-9fBOJ1MRw-Dm0laAqNtWhRZQRmWUuIMZ1Eo5LHmVSYll7TQOZdCQikKxnKD8Zyaioqqgorx0mABfXTRzV15t96Y0KqlDaWpa90YtwkKBAEeI4Ln_8CF2_h4clCUcABMaR6hyw4qvQvBm7laebvUfqsIVj_fU3-_F_GzDl-E1vkdC4LlPzv7KO1sG1rztbO1_1Q8h5wpPnpWt3Q0e3x_YWoI353Bd8w</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Provis, Chris</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Philosophical Documentation Center</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</title><author>Provis, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-bb4b25099904049042372506d499692ba769893c8b557e00f2ed28dd3d56ce083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aristotelean ethics</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Intragroup relations</topic><topic>Moral judgment</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>Political obligation</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Sociology of work</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Provis, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Provis, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics</atitle><jtitle>Business ethics quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>283-298</pages><issn>1052-150X</issn><eissn>2153-3326</eissn><abstract>Organisational politics can raise the problem of "dirty hands," illustrated in this paper by an example drawn from a textbook on organisation theory. The initial question is whether the main character has different ethical and political obligations, but this leads on to the question to what extent we can distinguish various different categories of obligation. The example may be of special interest because of the importance of close personal relationship in organisational politics, which brings the dirty hands problem together with the question to what extent friendships generate distinctive obligations. However, it is doubtful whether the allocation of obligations to different categories can be sustained in a useful way. It may be that we can put aside loyalty to an organisation, as a consideration which does not generate any distinctive obligation, but balancing other factors against one another may require the sort of judgment that has sometimes been called "political wisdom," and sometimes "moral imagination."</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.5840/beq200515215</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-150X
ispartof Business ethics quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.15 (2), p.283-298
issn 1052-150X
2153-3326
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38136813
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete
subjects Aristotelean ethics
Business ethics
Business studies
Friendship
Individual behaviour
Intragroup relations
Moral judgment
Morality
Organization theory
Organizational behavior
Political attitudes
Political ethics
Political obligation
Political philosophy
Social relations
Sociology of organizations
Sociology of work
Studies
Wisdom
title Dirty Hands and Loyalty in Organisational Politics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dirty%20Hands%20and%20Loyalty%20in%20Organisational%20Politics&rft.jtitle=Business%20ethics%20quarterly&rft.au=Provis,%20Chris&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=283-298&rft.issn=1052-150X&rft.eissn=2153-3326&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/beq200515215&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3857681%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216330227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3857681&rfr_iscdi=true