Asymmetric volatility of basis and the theory of storage
The theory of storage states that the marginal convenience yield on inventory falls at a decreasing rate as inventory increases. Previous literature has tested this hypothesis using the so‐called “direct test” approach, which employs a direct measurement of inventory levels, or the “indirect test” a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of futures markets 2005-04, Vol.25 (4), p.399-418 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 418 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | The journal of futures markets |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Gao, Andre H. Wang, George H. K. |
description | The theory of storage states that the marginal convenience yield on inventory falls at a decreasing rate as inventory increases. Previous literature has tested this hypothesis using the so‐called “direct test” approach, which employs a direct measurement of inventory levels, or the “indirect test” approach, which examines the relative variation of spot and futures prices and the relative variation of negative basis to positive basis as alternative proxies for inventory levels. The rationale behind the indirect test is based on the hypothesis that futures prices are less variable than spot prices when inventory is low, and have similar variability when inventory is high. The authors propose a “unified test” of the theory of storage that incorporates aspects of both direct and indirect tests in an ARMAX‐asymmetric GARCH model framework. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 25:399–418, 2005 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fut.20144 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38085555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38085555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-47effcc79ef026ad3bad876e494ef00439f5e3669682019651d98fa987c8cd9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKcP_gfFB8GHbkmT5uNxfmwTxkTd8DFkaaKZ7TqTTu1_b7eqD4IXLhcOv3M5HABOEewhCJO-3VS9BCJC9kAHQUFjITDZBx2YMBgzjMghOAphCSEUgsAO4INQF4WpvNPRe5mryuWuqqPSRgsVXIjUKouqF7Pd0u_0UJVePZtjcGBVHszJ9-2C-fBmdjWOJ3ej26vBJNYkYSQmzFirNRPGwoSqDC9Uxhk1RJBGgQQLmxpMqaC8iS1oijLBrRKcaa4zscBdcN7-XfvybWNCJQsXtMlztTLlJkjMIU-bacCzP-Cy3PhVk00mCCUII8Eb6KKFtC9D8MbKtXeF8rVEUG4LlE2Bcldgw_Zb9sPlpv4flMP57McRtw4XKvP561D-VVKGWSqfpiP5-JCS6fX4Xl7iL6Mgf_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211213198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asymmetric volatility of basis and the theory of storage</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gao, Andre H. ; Wang, George H. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Andre H. ; Wang, George H. K.</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of storage states that the marginal convenience yield on inventory falls at a decreasing rate as inventory increases. Previous literature has tested this hypothesis using the so‐called “direct test” approach, which employs a direct measurement of inventory levels, or the “indirect test” approach, which examines the relative variation of spot and futures prices and the relative variation of negative basis to positive basis as alternative proxies for inventory levels. The rationale behind the indirect test is based on the hypothesis that futures prices are less variable than spot prices when inventory is low, and have similar variability when inventory is high. The authors propose a “unified test” of the theory of storage that incorporates aspects of both direct and indirect tests in an ARMAX‐asymmetric GARCH model framework. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 25:399–418, 2005</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-7314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9934</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fut.20144</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFMADT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Finance ; Futures ; Hypotheses ; Inventory ; Regression analysis ; Stochastic models ; Studies ; Theory ; Volatility ; Yield</subject><ispartof>The journal of futures markets, 2005-04, Vol.25 (4), p.399-418</ispartof><rights>2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-47effcc79ef026ad3bad876e494ef00439f5e3669682019651d98fa987c8cd9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-47effcc79ef026ad3bad876e494ef00439f5e3669682019651d98fa987c8cd9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffut.20144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffut.20144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Andre H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, George H. K.</creatorcontrib><title>Asymmetric volatility of basis and the theory of storage</title><title>The journal of futures markets</title><addtitle>J. Fut. Mark</addtitle><description>The theory of storage states that the marginal convenience yield on inventory falls at a decreasing rate as inventory increases. Previous literature has tested this hypothesis using the so‐called “direct test” approach, which employs a direct measurement of inventory levels, or the “indirect test” approach, which examines the relative variation of spot and futures prices and the relative variation of negative basis to positive basis as alternative proxies for inventory levels. The rationale behind the indirect test is based on the hypothesis that futures prices are less variable than spot prices when inventory is low, and have similar variability when inventory is high. The authors propose a “unified test” of the theory of storage that incorporates aspects of both direct and indirect tests in an ARMAX‐asymmetric GARCH model framework. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 25:399–418, 2005</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Futures</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>0270-7314</issn><issn>1096-9934</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKcP_gfFB8GHbkmT5uNxfmwTxkTd8DFkaaKZ7TqTTu1_b7eqD4IXLhcOv3M5HABOEewhCJO-3VS9BCJC9kAHQUFjITDZBx2YMBgzjMghOAphCSEUgsAO4INQF4WpvNPRe5mryuWuqqPSRgsVXIjUKouqF7Pd0u_0UJVePZtjcGBVHszJ9-2C-fBmdjWOJ3ej26vBJNYkYSQmzFirNRPGwoSqDC9Uxhk1RJBGgQQLmxpMqaC8iS1oijLBrRKcaa4zscBdcN7-XfvybWNCJQsXtMlztTLlJkjMIU-bacCzP-Cy3PhVk00mCCUII8Eb6KKFtC9D8MbKtXeF8rVEUG4LlE2Bcldgw_Zb9sPlpv4flMP57McRtw4XKvP561D-VVKGWSqfpiP5-JCS6fX4Xl7iL6Mgf_g</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Gao, Andre H.</creator><creator>Wang, George H. K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Asymmetric volatility of basis and the theory of storage</title><author>Gao, Andre H. ; Wang, George H. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-47effcc79ef026ad3bad876e494ef00439f5e3669682019651d98fa987c8cd9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Futures</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Andre H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, George H. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of futures markets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Andre H.</au><au>Wang, George H. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asymmetric volatility of basis and the theory of storage</atitle><jtitle>The journal of futures markets</jtitle><addtitle>J. Fut. Mark</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>399-418</pages><issn>0270-7314</issn><eissn>1096-9934</eissn><coden>JFMADT</coden><abstract>The theory of storage states that the marginal convenience yield on inventory falls at a decreasing rate as inventory increases. Previous literature has tested this hypothesis using the so‐called “direct test” approach, which employs a direct measurement of inventory levels, or the “indirect test” approach, which examines the relative variation of spot and futures prices and the relative variation of negative basis to positive basis as alternative proxies for inventory levels. The rationale behind the indirect test is based on the hypothesis that futures prices are less variable than spot prices when inventory is low, and have similar variability when inventory is high. The authors propose a “unified test” of the theory of storage that incorporates aspects of both direct and indirect tests in an ARMAX‐asymmetric GARCH model framework. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 25:399–418, 2005</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/fut.20144</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-7314 |
ispartof | The journal of futures markets, 2005-04, Vol.25 (4), p.399-418 |
issn | 0270-7314 1096-9934 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38085555 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Economic theory Finance Futures Hypotheses Inventory Regression analysis Stochastic models Studies Theory Volatility Yield |
title | Asymmetric volatility of basis and the theory of storage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A06%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymmetric%20volatility%20of%20basis%20and%20the%20theory%20of%20storage&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20futures%20markets&rft.au=Gao,%20Andre%20H.&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=399-418&rft.issn=0270-7314&rft.eissn=1096-9934&rft.coden=JFMADT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fut.20144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38085555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211213198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |