The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status

This paper explores the implications for risk‐taking behavior and the equilibrium distribution of income of assuming that the desire for status positions is a powerful motive and that it raises the marginal utility of consumption. In contrast to previous analyses, we consider the case in which statu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of political economy 2005-04, Vol.113 (2), p.282-310
Hauptverfasser: Becker, Gary S., Murphy, Kevin M., Werning, Iván
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 2
container_start_page 282
container_title The Journal of political economy
container_volume 113
creator Becker, Gary S.
Murphy, Kevin M.
Werning, Iván
description This paper explores the implications for risk‐taking behavior and the equilibrium distribution of income of assuming that the desire for status positions is a powerful motive and that it raises the marginal utility of consumption. In contrast to previous analyses, we consider the case in which status positions are sold in a hedonic market. We show that such a complete hedonic market in status positions can be perfectly replicated by a simpler arrangement with a “status good” and a social norm that assigns higher status to those that consume more of this good. The main result is that for a wide range of initial conditions the equilibrium distribution over income, status, and consumption is the same, that this allocation requires inequality of income and consumption, and that this allocation coincides with the optimum of a utilitarian planner.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/427463
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38075123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ697070</ericid><jstor_id>10.1086/427463</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/427463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-e46303cd98768cc6804dc1a381f7a88167c850343605bfaa111642ce7f9646063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXAL-AQIcQtYMfP3EClQFERB4rELXJdh7okcevHgX-PUVBB3cse5tPs7ABwiuAVgoJdk4IThvfAAFHMc4rJ-z4YQFgUORZQHIIj71cwDYJ4AG5mS52NN9E0Zu5MbLM744Mz8xiM7TJbZ5NO2VZnsltkIaHP0n3qkNXWZa9BhuiPwUEtG69PfvcQvN2PZ6PHfPryMBndTnNFBAy5TpEgVotScCaUYgKShUISC1RzKQRiXAkKMcEM0nktJUKIkUJpXpeMMMjwEFz2vmtnN1H7ULXGK900stM2-ir9xikqcALPd8CVja5L2SpUUoILwf65KWe9d7qu1s600n1VCFY_LVZ9iwk860HtjNpC4ydWcshhki96OaqlUfLDrp32_u_irsvKB-u2NphSilKab4FDgDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195432866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status</title><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Becker, Gary S. ; Murphy, Kevin M. ; Werning, Iván</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S. ; Murphy, Kevin M. ; Werning, Iván</creatorcontrib><description>This paper explores the implications for risk‐taking behavior and the equilibrium distribution of income of assuming that the desire for status positions is a powerful motive and that it raises the marginal utility of consumption. In contrast to previous analyses, we consider the case in which status positions are sold in a hedonic market. We show that such a complete hedonic market in status positions can be perfectly replicated by a simpler arrangement with a “status good” and a social norm that assigns higher status to those that consume more of this good. The main result is that for a wide range of initial conditions the equilibrium distribution over income, status, and consumption is the same, that this allocation requires inequality of income and consumption, and that this allocation coincides with the optimum of a utilitarian planner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3808</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-534X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/427463</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLPEAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Consumer economics ; Consumer equilibrium ; Consumption ; Diminishing marginal utility ; Economic theory ; Economists ; Encyclopedias ; Endowments ; Equilibrium ; Income ; Income distribution ; Income inequality ; Income redistribution ; Inequality ; Lotteries ; Marginal utility ; Market ; Market equilibrium ; Philosophers ; Political economy ; Social status ; Socioeconomic factors ; Status ; Studies ; Utility functions</subject><ispartof>The Journal of political economy, 2005-04, Vol.113 (2), p.282-310</ispartof><rights>2005 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-e46303cd98768cc6804dc1a381f7a88167c850343605bfaa111642ce7f9646063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-e46303cd98768cc6804dc1a381f7a88167c850343605bfaa111642ce7f9646063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086%2F427463$$EPDF$$P50$$Guchicagopress$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086%2F427463$$EHTML$$P50$$Guchicagopress$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,54019,54023</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ697070$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werning, Iván</creatorcontrib><title>The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status</title><title>The Journal of political economy</title><description>This paper explores the implications for risk‐taking behavior and the equilibrium distribution of income of assuming that the desire for status positions is a powerful motive and that it raises the marginal utility of consumption. In contrast to previous analyses, we consider the case in which status positions are sold in a hedonic market. We show that such a complete hedonic market in status positions can be perfectly replicated by a simpler arrangement with a “status good” and a social norm that assigns higher status to those that consume more of this good. The main result is that for a wide range of initial conditions the equilibrium distribution over income, status, and consumption is the same, that this allocation requires inequality of income and consumption, and that this allocation coincides with the optimum of a utilitarian planner.</description><subject>Consumer economics</subject><subject>Consumer equilibrium</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Diminishing marginal utility</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Encyclopedias</subject><subject>Endowments</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Income redistribution</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Lotteries</subject><subject>Marginal utility</subject><subject>Market</subject><subject>Market equilibrium</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Status</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><issn>0022-3808</issn><issn>1537-534X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXAL-AQIcQtYMfP3EClQFERB4rELXJdh7okcevHgX-PUVBB3cse5tPs7ABwiuAVgoJdk4IThvfAAFHMc4rJ-z4YQFgUORZQHIIj71cwDYJ4AG5mS52NN9E0Zu5MbLM744Mz8xiM7TJbZ5NO2VZnsltkIaHP0n3qkNXWZa9BhuiPwUEtG69PfvcQvN2PZ6PHfPryMBndTnNFBAy5TpEgVotScCaUYgKShUISC1RzKQRiXAkKMcEM0nktJUKIkUJpXpeMMMjwEFz2vmtnN1H7ULXGK900stM2-ir9xikqcALPd8CVja5L2SpUUoILwf65KWe9d7qu1s600n1VCFY_LVZ9iwk860HtjNpC4ydWcshhki96OaqlUfLDrp32_u_irsvKB-u2NphSilKab4FDgDY</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Becker, Gary S.</creator><creator>Murphy, Kevin M.</creator><creator>Werning, Iván</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press, Journals Division</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status</title><author>Becker, Gary S. ; Murphy, Kevin M. ; Werning, Iván</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-e46303cd98768cc6804dc1a381f7a88167c850343605bfaa111642ce7f9646063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Consumer economics</topic><topic>Consumer equilibrium</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Diminishing marginal utility</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Encyclopedias</topic><topic>Endowments</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Income redistribution</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Lotteries</topic><topic>Marginal utility</topic><topic>Market</topic><topic>Market equilibrium</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Status</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werning, Iván</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Gary S.</au><au>Murphy, Kevin M.</au><au>Werning, Iván</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ697070</ericid><atitle>The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of political economy</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>282-310</pages><issn>0022-3808</issn><eissn>1537-534X</eissn><coden>JLPEAR</coden><abstract>This paper explores the implications for risk‐taking behavior and the equilibrium distribution of income of assuming that the desire for status positions is a powerful motive and that it raises the marginal utility of consumption. In contrast to previous analyses, we consider the case in which status positions are sold in a hedonic market. We show that such a complete hedonic market in status positions can be perfectly replicated by a simpler arrangement with a “status good” and a social norm that assigns higher status to those that consume more of this good. The main result is that for a wide range of initial conditions the equilibrium distribution over income, status, and consumption is the same, that this allocation requires inequality of income and consumption, and that this allocation coincides with the optimum of a utilitarian planner.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/427463</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3808
ispartof The Journal of political economy, 2005-04, Vol.113 (2), p.282-310
issn 0022-3808
1537-534X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38075123
source EBSCO Business Source Complete; University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run); JSTOR
subjects Consumer economics
Consumer equilibrium
Consumption
Diminishing marginal utility
Economic theory
Economists
Encyclopedias
Endowments
Equilibrium
Income
Income distribution
Income inequality
Income redistribution
Inequality
Lotteries
Marginal utility
Market
Market equilibrium
Philosophers
Political economy
Social status
Socioeconomic factors
Status
Studies
Utility functions
title The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Equilibrium%20Distribution%20of%20Income%20and%20the%20Market%20for%20Status&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20political%20economy&rft.au=Becker,%20Gary%C2%A0S.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=282-310&rft.issn=0022-3808&rft.eissn=1537-534X&rft.coden=JLPEAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/427463&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/427463%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195432866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ697070&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/427463&rfr_iscdi=true