AUTOMATIC INFERENCE OF THE CONTEMPORANEOUS CAUSAL ORDER OF A SYSTEM OF EQUATIONS
When Stephen Perez and I first began our Monte Carlo studies of the efficacy of general-to-specific search methodologies in 1995, we were keenly aware of our limited ability to capture the tacit knowledge of the skilled time-series econometrician operating in the London School of Economics (LSE) tra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Econometric theory 2005-02, Vol.21 (1), p.69-77 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | When Stephen Perez and I first began our Monte Carlo studies of the
efficacy of general-to-specific search methodologies in 1995, we were
keenly aware of our limited ability to capture the tacit knowledge of the
skilled time-series econometrician operating in the London School of
Economics (LSE) tradition (Hoover and Perez, 1999a, 1999b). Econometrics,
we believed, was an art, and our algorithm was not intended to replace the
artist. David Hendry and Hans-Martin Krolzig's subsequent development
of PcGets did not, in fact, eliminate the art of econometrics. Power tools
did not eliminate the art of the cabinetmaker but changed where his value
added lay and—importantly—made new things possible. PcGets is
likewise a new, powerful tool, useful in the hands of a skilled
craftsman.I thank Peter Phillips, Selva
Demiralp, Stephen Perez, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on
an earlier draft. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-4666 1469-4360 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S026646660505005X |