"Hinduism" and the History of "Religion": Protestant Presuppositions in the Critique of the Concept of Hinduism
The claim that Hinduism is not a religion, or not a single religion, is so often repeated that it might be considered an axiom of research into the religious beliefs and practices of the Hindus, were it not typically ignored immediately after having been stated. The arguments for this claim in the w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Method & theory in the study of religion 2003, Vol.15 (4), p.329-353 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 329 |
container_title | Method & theory in the study of religion |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sweetman, Will |
description | The claim that Hinduism is not a religion, or not a single religion, is so often repeated that it might be considered an axiom of research into the religious beliefs and practices of the Hindus, were it not typically ignored immediately after having been stated. The arguments for this claim in the work of several representative scholars are examined in order to show that they depend, implicitly or explicitly, upon a notion of religion which is too much influenced by Christian conceptions of what a religion is, a conception which, if it has not already been discarded by scholars of religion, certainly ought to be. Even where such Christian models are explicitly disavowed, the claim that Hinduism is not a religion can be shown to depend upon a particular religious conception of the nature of the world and our possible knowledge of it, which scholars of religion cannot share. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157006803322697407 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38048109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23551280</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23551280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3387-cd0045a2ae286e292302fec28e0fb3c3209986da5a69fc113bf6ac1529e8243f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfQBDKHnyr3iT9k_gm023qQJEJvoW0SzWza2rSgvv2pqvuRfApOff8TnI5CJ1iuMA4oZc4TgESBpQSkvA0gnQPDbph6KdkHw2ARzSkELNDdOTcCgB7mA-QGc10tWy1W48CWS2D5l0FM-0aYzeBKYLRsyr1mzbV6Cp4sqZRrpFV46_KtXVtnG685wJdbYNj6_Vnq7rkVpsqV3XTyd9fjtFBIUunTn7OIXqZ3C7Gs3D-OL0bX8_DjFKWhvkSIIolkYqwRBFOKJBC5YQpKDKaUwKcs2QpY5nwIseYZkUicxwTrhiJaEGH6Lx_t7bGb-QasdYuV2UpK2VaJyiDiGHgHiQ9mFvjnFWFqK1eS7sRGETXrfjbrQ-d9aFV19QuQWgcY-LJIQp73zepvna-tB8iSWkai_uHhZiym_kEXidi7nno-czqshQr09rKt_PfCt_JcZJc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38048109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Hinduism" and the History of "Religion": Protestant Presuppositions in the Critique of the Concept of Hinduism</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sweetman, Will</creator><creatorcontrib>Sweetman, Will</creatorcontrib><description>The claim that Hinduism is not a religion, or not a single religion, is so often repeated that it might be considered an axiom of research into the religious beliefs and practices of the Hindus, were it not typically ignored immediately after having been stated. The arguments for this claim in the work of several representative scholars are examined in order to show that they depend, implicitly or explicitly, upon a notion of religion which is too much influenced by Christian conceptions of what a religion is, a conception which, if it has not already been discarded by scholars of religion, certainly ought to be. Even where such Christian models are explicitly disavowed, the claim that Hinduism is not a religion can be shown to depend upon a particular religious conception of the nature of the world and our possible knowledge of it, which scholars of religion cannot share.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0943-3058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-0682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0943-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157006803322697407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Buddhism ; Christian history ; Christianity ; Comparative religion ; Conceptualization ; Hinduism ; Hindus ; History of religion ; Islam ; Judaism ; Religious beliefs ; Religious practice ; Religious rituals ; Religious studies ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Method & theory in the study of religion, 2003, Vol.15 (4), p.329-353</ispartof><rights>2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3387-cd0045a2ae286e292302fec28e0fb3c3209986da5a69fc113bf6ac1529e8243f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23551280$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23551280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sweetman, Will</creatorcontrib><title>"Hinduism" and the History of "Religion": Protestant Presuppositions in the Critique of the Concept of Hinduism</title><title>Method & theory in the study of religion</title><addtitle>MTSR</addtitle><description>The claim that Hinduism is not a religion, or not a single religion, is so often repeated that it might be considered an axiom of research into the religious beliefs and practices of the Hindus, were it not typically ignored immediately after having been stated. The arguments for this claim in the work of several representative scholars are examined in order to show that they depend, implicitly or explicitly, upon a notion of religion which is too much influenced by Christian conceptions of what a religion is, a conception which, if it has not already been discarded by scholars of religion, certainly ought to be. Even where such Christian models are explicitly disavowed, the claim that Hinduism is not a religion can be shown to depend upon a particular religious conception of the nature of the world and our possible knowledge of it, which scholars of religion cannot share.</description><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Christian history</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Comparative religion</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Hinduism</subject><subject>Hindus</subject><subject>History of religion</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Religious practice</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0943-3058</issn><issn>1570-0682</issn><issn>0943-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdfQBDKHnyr3iT9k_gm023qQJEJvoW0SzWza2rSgvv2pqvuRfApOff8TnI5CJ1iuMA4oZc4TgESBpQSkvA0gnQPDbph6KdkHw2ARzSkELNDdOTcCgB7mA-QGc10tWy1W48CWS2D5l0FM-0aYzeBKYLRsyr1mzbV6Cp4sqZRrpFV46_KtXVtnG685wJdbYNj6_Vnq7rkVpsqV3XTyd9fjtFBIUunTn7OIXqZ3C7Gs3D-OL0bX8_DjFKWhvkSIIolkYqwRBFOKJBC5YQpKDKaUwKcs2QpY5nwIseYZkUicxwTrhiJaEGH6Lx_t7bGb-QasdYuV2UpK2VaJyiDiGHgHiQ9mFvjnFWFqK1eS7sRGETXrfjbrQ-d9aFV19QuQWgcY-LJIQp73zepvna-tB8iSWkai_uHhZiym_kEXidi7nno-czqshQr09rKt_PfCt_JcZJc</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Sweetman, Will</creator><general>BRILL</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>"Hinduism" and the History of "Religion": Protestant Presuppositions in the Critique of the Concept of Hinduism</title><author>Sweetman, Will</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3387-cd0045a2ae286e292302fec28e0fb3c3209986da5a69fc113bf6ac1529e8243f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Christian history</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Comparative religion</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Hinduism</topic><topic>Hindus</topic><topic>History of religion</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Religious practice</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sweetman, Will</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Method & theory in the study of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sweetman, Will</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Hinduism" and the History of "Religion": Protestant Presuppositions in the Critique of the Concept of Hinduism</atitle><jtitle>Method & theory in the study of religion</jtitle><addtitle>MTSR</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>329-353</pages><issn>0943-3058</issn><eissn>1570-0682</eissn><eissn>0943-3058</eissn><abstract>The claim that Hinduism is not a religion, or not a single religion, is so often repeated that it might be considered an axiom of research into the religious beliefs and practices of the Hindus, were it not typically ignored immediately after having been stated. The arguments for this claim in the work of several representative scholars are examined in order to show that they depend, implicitly or explicitly, upon a notion of religion which is too much influenced by Christian conceptions of what a religion is, a conception which, if it has not already been discarded by scholars of religion, certainly ought to be. Even where such Christian models are explicitly disavowed, the claim that Hinduism is not a religion can be shown to depend upon a particular religious conception of the nature of the world and our possible knowledge of it, which scholars of religion cannot share.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/157006803322697407</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0943-3058 |
ispartof | Method & theory in the study of religion, 2003, Vol.15 (4), p.329-353 |
issn | 0943-3058 1570-0682 0943-3058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38048109 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Buddhism Christian history Christianity Comparative religion Conceptualization Hinduism Hindus History of religion Islam Judaism Religious beliefs Religious practice Religious rituals Religious studies Theology |
title | "Hinduism" and the History of "Religion": Protestant Presuppositions in the Critique of the Concept of Hinduism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T01%3A01%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Hinduism%22%20and%20the%20History%20of%20%22Religion%22:%20Protestant%20Presuppositions%20in%20the%20Critique%20of%20the%20Concept%20of%20Hinduism&rft.jtitle=Method%20&%20theory%20in%20the%20study%20of%20religion&rft.au=Sweetman,%20Will&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=329-353&rft.issn=0943-3058&rft.eissn=1570-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157006803322697407&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23551280%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38048109&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23551280&rfr_iscdi=true |