Control over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration
This article argues that mandatory arbitration is not itself the problem. The problem is instead that in some instances, one party to the dispute has exclusive control of the design of the dispute-resolution system. Consequently, research on mandatory arbitration should concentrate on who is structu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Law and contemporary problems 2004-01, Vol.67 (1/2), p.221-251 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 251 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1/2 |
| container_start_page | 221 |
| container_title | Law and contemporary problems |
| container_volume | 67 |
| creator | Bingham, Lisa B. |
| description | This article argues that mandatory arbitration is not itself the problem. The problem is instead that in some instances, one party to the dispute has exclusive control of the design of the dispute-resolution system. Consequently, research on mandatory arbitration should concentrate on who is structuring it, how they structure it, why this is so and how these choices affect dispute outcomes. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38029282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A123081094</galeid><jstor_id>27592040</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A123081094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g2161-718ba2aff85a2c4cbc6df6874fe9b74efde11b0ae0d23c28350cc71623fe9a043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF9LwzAQwIsoOKcfQSgKvlWSS9ukj2PqFCY-qM8lTS8lo01m0gr79mbMF2V3xx0cv_t7ksxolRcZMIDTZEYIsKyiojxPLkLYkCick1myWjo7eten7ht9-mDCdhoxe9-FEYf0AYPpbCptm75GJ0fnd-nSDQN6ZWSfLnxjRi9H4-xlcqZlH_DqN86Tz6fHj-Vztn5bvSwX66wDWtKMU9FIkFqLQoLKVaPKVpeC5xqrhueoW6S0IRJJC0yBYAVRitMSWAQkydk8uTv03Xr3NWEY68EEhX0vLbop1EwQqEBABG_-gRs3eRt3q4GKglfRInR7gDrZY22sdvEcte9YLygwIiip9jOzI1SHFr3snUVtYvoPf3-Ej9riYNTRgutDwSbEF9dbbwbpdzXwogKSE_YDzBWK0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218579579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Duke Law Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Bingham, Lisa B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bingham, Lisa B.</creatorcontrib><description>This article argues that mandatory arbitration is not itself the problem. The problem is instead that in some instances, one party to the dispute has exclusive control of the design of the dispute-resolution system. Consequently, research on mandatory arbitration should concentrate on who is structuring it, how they structure it, why this is so and how these choices affect dispute outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2322</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LCTPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: Duke University School of Law</publisher><subject>Alternative dispute resolution ; Arbitration ; Arbitration clauses ; Arbitration law ; Civil law ; Civil procedure ; Commercial arbitration ; Commercial law ; Disputes ; Employment ; Fees ; Judicial process ; Law ; Legal systems ; Mediation ; Political parties ; Systems design ; Transaction costs ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Law and contemporary problems, 2004-01, Vol.67 (1/2), p.221-251</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Duke University, School of Law</rights><rights>Copyright Duke University School of Law Winter 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27592040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27592040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bingham, Lisa B.</creatorcontrib><title>Control over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration</title><title>Law and contemporary problems</title><description>This article argues that mandatory arbitration is not itself the problem. The problem is instead that in some instances, one party to the dispute has exclusive control of the design of the dispute-resolution system. Consequently, research on mandatory arbitration should concentrate on who is structuring it, how they structure it, why this is so and how these choices affect dispute outcomes.</description><subject>Alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Arbitration clauses</subject><subject>Arbitration law</subject><subject>Civil law</subject><subject>Civil procedure</subject><subject>Commercial arbitration</subject><subject>Commercial law</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Judicial process</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legal systems</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0023-9186</issn><issn>1945-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNptkF9LwzAQwIsoOKcfQSgKvlWSS9ukj2PqFCY-qM8lTS8lo01m0gr79mbMF2V3xx0cv_t7ksxolRcZMIDTZEYIsKyiojxPLkLYkCick1myWjo7eten7ht9-mDCdhoxe9-FEYf0AYPpbCptm75GJ0fnd-nSDQN6ZWSfLnxjRi9H4-xlcqZlH_DqN86Tz6fHj-Vztn5bvSwX66wDWtKMU9FIkFqLQoLKVaPKVpeC5xqrhueoW6S0IRJJC0yBYAVRitMSWAQkydk8uTv03Xr3NWEY68EEhX0vLbop1EwQqEBABG_-gRs3eRt3q4GKglfRInR7gDrZY22sdvEcte9YLygwIiip9jOzI1SHFr3snUVtYvoPf3-Ej9riYNTRgutDwSbEF9dbbwbpdzXwogKSE_YDzBWK0g</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Bingham, Lisa B.</creator><general>Duke University School of Law</general><general>Duke University, School of Law</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Control over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration</title><author>Bingham, Lisa B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2161-718ba2aff85a2c4cbc6df6874fe9b74efde11b0ae0d23c28350cc71623fe9a043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Alternative dispute resolution</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Arbitration clauses</topic><topic>Arbitration law</topic><topic>Civil law</topic><topic>Civil procedure</topic><topic>Commercial arbitration</topic><topic>Commercial law</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Judicial process</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legal systems</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bingham, Lisa B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Law and contemporary problems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bingham, Lisa B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Control over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration</atitle><jtitle>Law and contemporary problems</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>221-251</pages><issn>0023-9186</issn><eissn>1945-2322</eissn><coden>LCTPA5</coden><abstract>This article argues that mandatory arbitration is not itself the problem. The problem is instead that in some instances, one party to the dispute has exclusive control of the design of the dispute-resolution system. Consequently, research on mandatory arbitration should concentrate on who is structuring it, how they structure it, why this is so and how these choices affect dispute outcomes.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>Duke University School of Law</pub><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-9186 |
| ispartof | Law and contemporary problems, 2004-01, Vol.67 (1/2), p.221-251 |
| issn | 0023-9186 1945-2322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38029282 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Duke Law Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Alternative dispute resolution Arbitration Arbitration clauses Arbitration law Civil law Civil procedure Commercial arbitration Commercial law Disputes Employment Fees Judicial process Law Legal systems Mediation Political parties Systems design Transaction costs U.S.A |
| title | Control over Dispute-System Design and Mandatory Commercial Arbitration |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20over%20Dispute-System%20Design%20and%20Mandatory%20Commercial%20Arbitration&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20contemporary%20problems&rft.au=Bingham,%20Lisa%20B.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=221-251&rft.issn=0023-9186&rft.eissn=1945-2322&rft.coden=LCTPA5&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA123081094%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218579579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A123081094&rft_jstor_id=27592040&rfr_iscdi=true |