Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon
Thomas M. Lennon debates on the particular use that, in expounding his conception of the relationship between faith and reason, Bayle makes of a passage from Saint-Evremond. In Lennon's view the correct interpretation of this point would show that Bayle's fideism is to be "taken at fa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the history of ideas 2004-04, Vol.65 (2), p.323-334 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 334 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 323 |
| container_title | Journal of the history of ideas |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Mori, Gianluca |
| description | Thomas M. Lennon debates on the particular use that, in expounding his conception of the relationship between faith and reason, Bayle makes of a passage from Saint-Evremond. In Lennon's view the correct interpretation of this point would show that Bayle's fideism is to be "taken at face value" without any hint of irony and with no suspicion of dissimulation or insincerity, which somehow cast doubt on and greatly weaken the Gianluca Mori's interpretation in Bayle philosophe. Here, Mori responds to Lennon's arguments and clarifies what is the right perspective in which to consider Bayle's position on the topic. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1353/jhi.2004.0030 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37990012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3654212</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3654212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-9f3b45df3d9a4fd35c6adc7ec45ef6e06d7d172ebbfeb3d0c004179dca1b1daa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMoOD6W7lwEF66m401uH1M3ouILRgRH1yFNbrGlbcamI8y_N2VEwdXdfPecw8fYiYCZwAQv6o9qJgHiGQDCDpsImKcRSil32QRAyigBzPbZgfc1BGyOOGFXN3rT0JQvddUN0d1XT63r7JTrzvL7ylLl20t-zV9p1Wz44Pjbh2u1588zvqCuc90R2yt14-n45x6y9_u7t9vHaPHy8HR7vYiMRBiivMQiTmyJNtdxaTExqbYmIxMnVKYEqc2syCQVRUkFWjBhn8hya7QohNUaD9n5NnfVu881-UG1lTfUNLojt_YKszwHEDKAZ__A2q37LmxTEhDneZ7EAYq2kOmd9z2VatVXre43SoAaXargUo0u1egy8PFvaE1maNee_nJFhvME1HL0PeqGODRJzMLb6fat9oPrfzswTWIZpn4DXll_EQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203389954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Mori, Gianluca</creator><creatorcontrib>Mori, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><description>Thomas M. Lennon debates on the particular use that, in expounding his conception of the relationship between faith and reason, Bayle makes of a passage from Saint-Evremond. In Lennon's view the correct interpretation of this point would show that Bayle's fideism is to be "taken at face value" without any hint of irony and with no suspicion of dissimulation or insincerity, which somehow cast doubt on and greatly weaken the Gianluca Mori's interpretation in Bayle philosophe. Here, Mori responds to Lennon's arguments and clarifies what is the right perspective in which to consider Bayle's position on the topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5037</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1086-3222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-3222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2004.0030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHIDAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Bayle, Pierre ; Bayle, Pierre (1647-1706) ; Christianity ; Contradictories ; Faith ; Fideism ; History ; History of ideas ; Irony ; Irrationalism ; Lennon, Thomas ; Literary criticism ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of religion ; Provocation defense ; Publishing industry ; Reason ; Reasonable reliance ; Religion ; Skepticism</subject><ispartof>Journal of the history of ideas, 2004-04, Vol.65 (2), p.323-334</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Journal of the History of Ideas, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004 The Journal of the History of Ideas, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3654212$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3654212$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mori, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><title>Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon</title><title>Journal of the history of ideas</title><description>Thomas M. Lennon debates on the particular use that, in expounding his conception of the relationship between faith and reason, Bayle makes of a passage from Saint-Evremond. In Lennon's view the correct interpretation of this point would show that Bayle's fideism is to be "taken at face value" without any hint of irony and with no suspicion of dissimulation or insincerity, which somehow cast doubt on and greatly weaken the Gianluca Mori's interpretation in Bayle philosophe. Here, Mori responds to Lennon's arguments and clarifies what is the right perspective in which to consider Bayle's position on the topic.</description><subject>Bayle, Pierre</subject><subject>Bayle, Pierre (1647-1706)</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Contradictories</subject><subject>Faith</subject><subject>Fideism</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of ideas</subject><subject>Irony</subject><subject>Irrationalism</subject><subject>Lennon, Thomas</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of religion</subject><subject>Provocation defense</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><subject>Reason</subject><subject>Reasonable reliance</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><issn>0022-5037</issn><issn>1086-3222</issn><issn>1086-3222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMoOD6W7lwEF66m401uH1M3ouILRgRH1yFNbrGlbcamI8y_N2VEwdXdfPecw8fYiYCZwAQv6o9qJgHiGQDCDpsImKcRSil32QRAyigBzPbZgfc1BGyOOGFXN3rT0JQvddUN0d1XT63r7JTrzvL7ylLl20t-zV9p1Wz44Pjbh2u1588zvqCuc90R2yt14-n45x6y9_u7t9vHaPHy8HR7vYiMRBiivMQiTmyJNtdxaTExqbYmIxMnVKYEqc2syCQVRUkFWjBhn8hya7QohNUaD9n5NnfVu881-UG1lTfUNLojt_YKszwHEDKAZ__A2q37LmxTEhDneZ7EAYq2kOmd9z2VatVXre43SoAaXargUo0u1egy8PFvaE1maNee_nJFhvME1HL0PeqGODRJzMLb6fat9oPrfzswTWIZpn4DXll_EQ</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Mori, Gianluca</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><general>University of Pennsylvania Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PEJEM</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon</title><author>Mori, Gianluca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-9f3b45df3d9a4fd35c6adc7ec45ef6e06d7d172ebbfeb3d0c004179dca1b1daa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Bayle, Pierre</topic><topic>Bayle, Pierre (1647-1706)</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Contradictories</topic><topic>Faith</topic><topic>Fideism</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of ideas</topic><topic>Irony</topic><topic>Irrationalism</topic><topic>Lennon, Thomas</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of religion</topic><topic>Provocation defense</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><topic>Reason</topic><topic>Reasonable reliance</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mori, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest One Visual Arts & Design</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of the history of ideas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mori, Gianluca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the history of ideas</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>323-334</pages><issn>0022-5037</issn><issn>1086-3222</issn><eissn>1086-3222</eissn><coden>JHIDAT</coden><abstract>Thomas M. Lennon debates on the particular use that, in expounding his conception of the relationship between faith and reason, Bayle makes of a passage from Saint-Evremond. In Lennon's view the correct interpretation of this point would show that Bayle's fideism is to be "taken at face value" without any hint of irony and with no suspicion of dissimulation or insincerity, which somehow cast doubt on and greatly weaken the Gianluca Mori's interpretation in Bayle philosophe. Here, Mori responds to Lennon's arguments and clarifies what is the right perspective in which to consider Bayle's position on the topic.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/jhi.2004.0030</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-5037 |
| ispartof | Journal of the history of ideas, 2004-04, Vol.65 (2), p.323-334 |
| issn | 0022-5037 1086-3222 1086-3222 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37990012 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Bayle, Pierre Bayle, Pierre (1647-1706) Christianity Contradictories Faith Fideism History History of ideas Irony Irrationalism Lennon, Thomas Literary criticism Philosophy Philosophy of religion Provocation defense Publishing industry Reason Reasonable reliance Religion Skepticism |
| title | Bayle, Saint-Evremond, and Fideism: A Reply to Thomas M. Lennon |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T02%3A55%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bayle,%20Saint-Evremond,%20and%20Fideism:%20A%20Reply%20to%20Thomas%20M.%20Lennon&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20history%20of%20ideas&rft.au=Mori,%20Gianluca&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=323-334&rft.issn=0022-5037&rft.eissn=1086-3222&rft.coden=JHIDAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jhi.2004.0030&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3654212%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203389954&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3654212&rfr_iscdi=true |