Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants

Both debt covenants and federal monitoring restrict banks’ discretion. We examine whether banks substituted monitoring for covenants by investigating debt issues of 105 banks between 1979 and 1984, a period when monitoring increased. We hypothesize that bank shareholders take advantage of the inters...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of accounting & economics 2004-09, Vol.37 (3), p.367-391
Hauptverfasser: Black, Ervin L., Carnes, Thomas A., Mosebach, Michael, Moyer, Susan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 391
container_issue 3
container_start_page 367
container_title Journal of accounting & economics
container_volume 37
creator Black, Ervin L.
Carnes, Thomas A.
Mosebach, Michael
Moyer, Susan E.
description Both debt covenants and federal monitoring restrict banks’ discretion. We examine whether banks substituted monitoring for covenants by investigating debt issues of 105 banks between 1979 and 1984, a period when monitoring increased. We hypothesize that bank shareholders take advantage of the intersection between debt covenants and regulatory monitoring to reduce agency costs. We find a decrease in the number of debt issues containing such covenants and the total debt subject to such covenants. We find no such decrease during the same period for a sample of non-banking firms, or for banks during a subsequent period.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37987540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165410104000217</els_id><sourcerecordid>37987540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-3dc341e97430017324955a3ed11ce36f48bc4bb6d79b260eb199cdaa765d7f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gtCVu9ZkkjbNSmTwlwFBdB3S9HZMmTY1SQfm7U3t4NbFzQ3Jdw6Hg9A1wRnBpLhts1ZpDdpmK4xZhkmGMTlBC1JykRJR4lO0iFyesoifowvvWxzBVYkXqHyH7bhTwbpD0tnexIvpt4nyiUr8WPlgwhggaaxLaqhCou0eetUHf4nOGrXzcHXcS_T5-PCxfk43b08v6_tNqlkhQkprTRkBwRmNoThdMZHnikJNiAZaNKysNKuqouaiWhUYKiKErpXiRV7zpgC6RDez7-Ds9wg-yM54Dbud6sGOXlIuSp4zHMF8BrWz3jto5OBMp9xBEiynnmQrjz3JqSeJiYyRou511jkYQP-JAKBVke3lXlJFeTwOcX6VVJnpLc4w7SJ-CiK_QhfN7mYziJXsDTjptYFeQ20c6CBra_6J8wNK0IyV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37987540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Black, Ervin L. ; Carnes, Thomas A. ; Mosebach, Michael ; Moyer, Susan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Black, Ervin L. ; Carnes, Thomas A. ; Mosebach, Michael ; Moyer, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Both debt covenants and federal monitoring restrict banks’ discretion. We examine whether banks substituted monitoring for covenants by investigating debt issues of 105 banks between 1979 and 1984, a period when monitoring increased. We hypothesize that bank shareholders take advantage of the intersection between debt covenants and regulatory monitoring to reduce agency costs. We find a decrease in the number of debt issues containing such covenants and the total debt subject to such covenants. We find no such decrease during the same period for a sample of non-banking firms, or for banks during a subsequent period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-4101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Banks ; Debt ; Debt covenants ; Monitoring ; Regulation ; Substitution</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting &amp; economics, 2004-09, Vol.37 (3), p.367-391</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-3dc341e97430017324955a3ed11ce36f48bc4bb6d79b260eb199cdaa765d7f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-3dc341e97430017324955a3ed11ce36f48bc4bb6d79b260eb199cdaa765d7f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,3994,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejaecon/v_3a37_3ay_3a2004_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a367-391.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Black, Ervin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosebach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants</title><title>Journal of accounting &amp; economics</title><description>Both debt covenants and federal monitoring restrict banks’ discretion. We examine whether banks substituted monitoring for covenants by investigating debt issues of 105 banks between 1979 and 1984, a period when monitoring increased. We hypothesize that bank shareholders take advantage of the intersection between debt covenants and regulatory monitoring to reduce agency costs. We find a decrease in the number of debt issues containing such covenants and the total debt subject to such covenants. We find no such decrease during the same period for a sample of non-banking firms, or for banks during a subsequent period.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt covenants</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Substitution</subject><issn>0165-4101</issn><issn>1879-1980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gtCVu9ZkkjbNSmTwlwFBdB3S9HZMmTY1SQfm7U3t4NbFzQ3Jdw6Hg9A1wRnBpLhts1ZpDdpmK4xZhkmGMTlBC1JykRJR4lO0iFyesoifowvvWxzBVYkXqHyH7bhTwbpD0tnexIvpt4nyiUr8WPlgwhggaaxLaqhCou0eetUHf4nOGrXzcHXcS_T5-PCxfk43b08v6_tNqlkhQkprTRkBwRmNoThdMZHnikJNiAZaNKysNKuqouaiWhUYKiKErpXiRV7zpgC6RDez7-Ds9wg-yM54Dbud6sGOXlIuSp4zHMF8BrWz3jto5OBMp9xBEiynnmQrjz3JqSeJiYyRou511jkYQP-JAKBVke3lXlJFeTwOcX6VVJnpLc4w7SJ-CiK_QhfN7mYziJXsDTjptYFeQ20c6CBra_6J8wNK0IyV</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Black, Ervin L.</creator><creator>Carnes, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Mosebach, Michael</creator><creator>Moyer, Susan E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants</title><author>Black, Ervin L. ; Carnes, Thomas A. ; Mosebach, Michael ; Moyer, Susan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-3dc341e97430017324955a3ed11ce36f48bc4bb6d79b260eb199cdaa765d7f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt covenants</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Substitution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Black, Ervin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosebach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting &amp; economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Black, Ervin L.</au><au>Carnes, Thomas A.</au><au>Mosebach, Michael</au><au>Moyer, Susan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting &amp; economics</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>391</epage><pages>367-391</pages><issn>0165-4101</issn><eissn>1879-1980</eissn><abstract>Both debt covenants and federal monitoring restrict banks’ discretion. We examine whether banks substituted monitoring for covenants by investigating debt issues of 105 banks between 1979 and 1984, a period when monitoring increased. We hypothesize that bank shareholders take advantage of the intersection between debt covenants and regulatory monitoring to reduce agency costs. We find a decrease in the number of debt issues containing such covenants and the total debt subject to such covenants. We find no such decrease during the same period for a sample of non-banking firms, or for banks during a subsequent period.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.001</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-4101
ispartof Journal of accounting & economics, 2004-09, Vol.37 (3), p.367-391
issn 0165-4101
1879-1980
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37987540
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accounting
Banks
Debt
Debt covenants
Monitoring
Regulation
Substitution
title Regulatory monitoring as a substitute for debt covenants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulatory%20monitoring%20as%20a%20substitute%20for%20debt%20covenants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20&%20economics&rft.au=Black,%20Ervin%20L.&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=391&rft.pages=367-391&rft.issn=0165-4101&rft.eissn=1879-1980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37987540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37987540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0165410104000217&rfr_iscdi=true