Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market

We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of accounting research 2004-09, Vol.42 (4), p.755-793
Hauptverfasser: MANSI, SATTAR A., MAXWELL, WILLIAM F., MILLER, DARIUS P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 793
container_issue 4
container_start_page 755
container_title Journal of accounting research
container_volume 42
creator MANSI, SATTAR A.
MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.
MILLER, DARIUS P.
description We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37969348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3542299</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3542299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhG3CwOHDL4j-xHR8Q2pbSdrWloiqC28ibTNSEbLy1k2X32-M0aA891dLYluf9nkbPSUIYnbO4PjVzlmmZKm1-zzml2ZxSJtV8_yKZHRsvkxmlnKV5JtXr5E0IDaXUSMFmye1Xh4EshrLunSc_BtvW_YHYriR32A0eybXte_Skd-Sq22GIqvCFnO_qErsCSeXdhvT3SE5dRK6t_4P92-RVZduA7_6fJ8nPb-d3Z5fp6ubi6myxSguVaZUyaiiVOVtbqqzRlbZWCVGW2lJbCpObSuq1LlWxthVDUzApK8O5LitmtUIuTpKPk-_Wu4chjgabOhTYtrZDNwQQ2igjsjwKPzwRNm7wXZwNOFVaSCVGUT6JCu9C8FjB1tcb6w_AKIxJQwNjoDAGCmPS8Jg07CO6nFCPWyyO3Lq1jbMeA-xA2IzH7RDrERW2Ht9ibWNpKUEbAff9Jpp9nsz-1i0enj0ELG8Wt_EW-fcT34x_deSFzDg3JrbTqV2HHvfHdvy46Cmi86_vF3DJWc7V6QqW4h8QIbU-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206735638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>MANSI, SATTAR A. ; MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. ; MILLER, DARIUS P.</creator><creatorcontrib>MANSI, SATTAR A. ; MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. ; MILLER, DARIUS P.</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishing, Inc</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Accounting research ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Bond markets ; Bond rating ; Bonds ; Business accounting ; Business structures ; Corporate bonds ; Correlation analysis ; Credit ratings ; Debt ; Debt financing ; Financial audits ; Initial public offerings ; Investment ; Investors ; Quality ; Stock prices ; Studies ; Tenure ; Yield curves</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2004-09, Vol.42 (4), p.755-793</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Institute of Professional Accounting, University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright Institute of Professional Accounting Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3542299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3542299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,3994,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajoares/v_3a42_3ay_3a2004_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a755-793.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANSI, SATTAR A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLER, DARIUS P.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting research</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Bond rating</subject><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Business accounting</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Corporate bonds</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Credit ratings</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Financial audits</subject><subject>Initial public offerings</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Yield curves</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhG3CwOHDL4j-xHR8Q2pbSdrWloiqC28ibTNSEbLy1k2X32-M0aA891dLYluf9nkbPSUIYnbO4PjVzlmmZKm1-zzml2ZxSJtV8_yKZHRsvkxmlnKV5JtXr5E0IDaXUSMFmye1Xh4EshrLunSc_BtvW_YHYriR32A0eybXte_Skd-Sq22GIqvCFnO_qErsCSeXdhvT3SE5dRK6t_4P92-RVZduA7_6fJ8nPb-d3Z5fp6ubi6myxSguVaZUyaiiVOVtbqqzRlbZWCVGW2lJbCpObSuq1LlWxthVDUzApK8O5LitmtUIuTpKPk-_Wu4chjgabOhTYtrZDNwQQ2igjsjwKPzwRNm7wXZwNOFVaSCVGUT6JCu9C8FjB1tcb6w_AKIxJQwNjoDAGCmPS8Jg07CO6nFCPWyyO3Lq1jbMeA-xA2IzH7RDrERW2Ht9ibWNpKUEbAff9Jpp9nsz-1i0enj0ELG8Wt_EW-fcT34x_deSFzDg3JrbTqV2HHvfHdvy46Cmi86_vF3DJWc7V6QqW4h8QIbU-</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>MANSI, SATTAR A.</creator><creator>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</creator><creator>MILLER, DARIUS P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing, Inc</general><general>The Institute of Professional Accounting, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</title><author>MANSI, SATTAR A. ; MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. ; MILLER, DARIUS P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting research</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Bond rating</topic><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Business accounting</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Corporate bonds</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Credit ratings</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Financial audits</topic><topic>Initial public offerings</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Yield curves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANSI, SATTAR A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLER, DARIUS P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANSI, SATTAR A.</au><au>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</au><au>MILLER, DARIUS P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>755</spage><epage>793</epage><pages>755-793</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8456
ispartof Journal of accounting research, 2004-09, Vol.42 (4), p.755-793
issn 0021-8456
1475-679X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37969348
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accounting
Accounting research
Auditing
Auditors
Bond markets
Bond rating
Bonds
Business accounting
Business structures
Corporate bonds
Correlation analysis
Credit ratings
Debt
Debt financing
Financial audits
Initial public offerings
Investment
Investors
Quality
Stock prices
Studies
Tenure
Yield curves
title Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Auditor%20Quality%20and%20Tenure%20Matter%20to%20Investors?%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Bond%20Market&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=MANSI,%20SATTAR%20A.&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=755&rft.epage=793&rft.pages=755-793&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3542299%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206735638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3542299&rfr_iscdi=true