Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market
We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of accounting research 2004-09, Vol.42 (4), p.755-793 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 793 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 755 |
container_title | Journal of accounting research |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | MANSI, SATTAR A. MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. MILLER, DARIUS P. |
description | We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37969348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3542299</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3542299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhG3CwOHDL4j-xHR8Q2pbSdrWloiqC28ibTNSEbLy1k2X32-M0aA891dLYluf9nkbPSUIYnbO4PjVzlmmZKm1-zzml2ZxSJtV8_yKZHRsvkxmlnKV5JtXr5E0IDaXUSMFmye1Xh4EshrLunSc_BtvW_YHYriR32A0eybXte_Skd-Sq22GIqvCFnO_qErsCSeXdhvT3SE5dRK6t_4P92-RVZduA7_6fJ8nPb-d3Z5fp6ubi6myxSguVaZUyaiiVOVtbqqzRlbZWCVGW2lJbCpObSuq1LlWxthVDUzApK8O5LitmtUIuTpKPk-_Wu4chjgabOhTYtrZDNwQQ2igjsjwKPzwRNm7wXZwNOFVaSCVGUT6JCu9C8FjB1tcb6w_AKIxJQwNjoDAGCmPS8Jg07CO6nFCPWyyO3Lq1jbMeA-xA2IzH7RDrERW2Ht9ibWNpKUEbAff9Jpp9nsz-1i0enj0ELG8Wt_EW-fcT34x_deSFzDg3JrbTqV2HHvfHdvy46Cmi86_vF3DJWc7V6QqW4h8QIbU-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206735638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>MANSI, SATTAR A. ; MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. ; MILLER, DARIUS P.</creator><creatorcontrib>MANSI, SATTAR A. ; MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. ; MILLER, DARIUS P.</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishing, Inc</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Accounting research ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Bond markets ; Bond rating ; Bonds ; Business accounting ; Business structures ; Corporate bonds ; Correlation analysis ; Credit ratings ; Debt ; Debt financing ; Financial audits ; Initial public offerings ; Investment ; Investors ; Quality ; Stock prices ; Studies ; Tenure ; Yield curves</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2004-09, Vol.42 (4), p.755-793</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Institute of Professional Accounting, University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright Institute of Professional Accounting Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3542299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3542299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,3994,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajoares/v_3a42_3ay_3a2004_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a755-793.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANSI, SATTAR A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLER, DARIUS P.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting research</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Bond rating</subject><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Business accounting</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Corporate bonds</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Credit ratings</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Financial audits</subject><subject>Initial public offerings</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Yield curves</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhG3CwOHDL4j-xHR8Q2pbSdrWloiqC28ibTNSEbLy1k2X32-M0aA891dLYluf9nkbPSUIYnbO4PjVzlmmZKm1-zzml2ZxSJtV8_yKZHRsvkxmlnKV5JtXr5E0IDaXUSMFmye1Xh4EshrLunSc_BtvW_YHYriR32A0eybXte_Skd-Sq22GIqvCFnO_qErsCSeXdhvT3SE5dRK6t_4P92-RVZduA7_6fJ8nPb-d3Z5fp6ubi6myxSguVaZUyaiiVOVtbqqzRlbZWCVGW2lJbCpObSuq1LlWxthVDUzApK8O5LitmtUIuTpKPk-_Wu4chjgabOhTYtrZDNwQQ2igjsjwKPzwRNm7wXZwNOFVaSCVGUT6JCu9C8FjB1tcb6w_AKIxJQwNjoDAGCmPS8Jg07CO6nFCPWyyO3Lq1jbMeA-xA2IzH7RDrERW2Ht9ibWNpKUEbAff9Jpp9nsz-1i0enj0ELG8Wt_EW-fcT34x_deSFzDg3JrbTqV2HHvfHdvy46Cmi86_vF3DJWc7V6QqW4h8QIbU-</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>MANSI, SATTAR A.</creator><creator>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</creator><creator>MILLER, DARIUS P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing, Inc</general><general>The Institute of Professional Accounting, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago</general><general>Wiley Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</title><author>MANSI, SATTAR A. ; MAXWELL, WILLIAM F. ; MILLER, DARIUS P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6476-10900581ba06a97f7aa633dd7a0ad3989f57b7d6cbaf1e9c155f9227df1a76e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting research</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Bond rating</topic><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Business accounting</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Corporate bonds</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Credit ratings</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Financial audits</topic><topic>Initial public offerings</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Yield curves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANSI, SATTAR A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MILLER, DARIUS P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANSI, SATTAR A.</au><au>MAXWELL, WILLIAM F.</au><au>MILLER, DARIUS P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>755</spage><epage>793</epage><pages>755-793</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>We examine the relation between auditor characteristics (quality and tenure) and the cost of debt financing. Consistent with the hypothesis that audit characteristics are important to the capital markets, we find that (1) auditor quality and tenure are negatively and significantly related to the cost of debt financing, (2) the relation between auditor characteristics and the cost of debt is most pronounced in firms with debt that is noninvestment grade, and (3) both the insurance and information role of audits are economically significant to the cost of debt. Overall, our results suggest that, through their dual roles of providing information and insurance, auditor quality and tenure matter to capital market participants.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8456 |
ispartof | Journal of accounting research, 2004-09, Vol.42 (4), p.755-793 |
issn | 0021-8456 1475-679X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37969348 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Accounting Accounting research Auditing Auditors Bond markets Bond rating Bonds Business accounting Business structures Corporate bonds Correlation analysis Credit ratings Debt Debt financing Financial audits Initial public offerings Investment Investors Quality Stock prices Studies Tenure Yield curves |
title | Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Auditor%20Quality%20and%20Tenure%20Matter%20to%20Investors?%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Bond%20Market&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=MANSI,%20SATTAR%20A.&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=755&rft.epage=793&rft.pages=755-793&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00156.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3542299%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206735638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3542299&rfr_iscdi=true |