Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies

This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that som...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoforum 2004-09, Vol.35 (5), p.553-558
1. Verfasser: Berg, Lawrence D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 558
container_issue 5
container_start_page 553
container_title Geoforum
container_volume 35
creator Berg, Lawrence D.
description This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37952016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718504000181</els_id><sourcerecordid>37952016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwF1AmtoRzHDc2E6iCglSJAZgtx7kElzQOdkrVf4-rwsTAdLrTe-_0PkIuKWQU6Ox6lbXoGuc36ywHKDKgGQA_IhMqyjyVTIpjMoGoTEsq-Ck5C2EFACUTckIWL0Z3tm-Tj95tO6xbvElGt9W-DolOjLejjYIkfmi9Ht53iWv-Xi2Gc3LS6C7gxc-ckreH-9f5Y7p8XjzN75apYQUdU15SmgPWpqhqkLIqChSCNTOhi1IzXles4ihzzgBYVQnOTIGoUTaU6f3KpuTqkDt497nBMKq1DQa7TvfoNkGxUvI8do3C2UFovAvBY6MGb9fa7xQFteemVuqXm9pzU0BV5BaNtwcjxhpfFr0KxmJvsLYezahqZ_-L-AaLX3rH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37952016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Berg, Lawrence D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berg, Lawrence D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anglo-American hegemony ; Cultural politics ; Geographic knowledges ; Geographic scale ; Geography ; Hierarchical space</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2004-09, Vol.35 (5), p.553-558</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718504000181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berg, Lawrence D.</creatorcontrib><title>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.</description><subject>Anglo-American hegemony</subject><subject>Cultural politics</subject><subject>Geographic knowledges</subject><subject>Geographic scale</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Hierarchical space</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwF1AmtoRzHDc2E6iCglSJAZgtx7kElzQOdkrVf4-rwsTAdLrTe-_0PkIuKWQU6Ox6lbXoGuc36ywHKDKgGQA_IhMqyjyVTIpjMoGoTEsq-Ck5C2EFACUTckIWL0Z3tm-Tj95tO6xbvElGt9W-DolOjLejjYIkfmi9Ht53iWv-Xi2Gc3LS6C7gxc-ckreH-9f5Y7p8XjzN75apYQUdU15SmgPWpqhqkLIqChSCNTOhi1IzXles4ihzzgBYVQnOTIGoUTaU6f3KpuTqkDt497nBMKq1DQa7TvfoNkGxUvI8do3C2UFovAvBY6MGb9fa7xQFteemVuqXm9pzU0BV5BaNtwcjxhpfFr0KxmJvsLYezahqZ_-L-AaLX3rH</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Berg, Lawrence D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</title><author>Berg, Lawrence D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Anglo-American hegemony</topic><topic>Cultural politics</topic><topic>Geographic knowledges</topic><topic>Geographic scale</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Hierarchical space</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berg, Lawrence D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berg, Lawrence D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>553-558</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7185
ispartof Geoforum, 2004-09, Vol.35 (5), p.553-558
issn 0016-7185
1872-9398
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37952016
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anglo-American hegemony
Cultural politics
Geographic knowledges
Geographic scale
Geography
Hierarchical space
title Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scaling%20knowledge:%20towards%20a%20critical%20geography%20of%20critical%20geographies&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Berg,%20Lawrence%20D.&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=553-558&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37952016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37952016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718504000181&rfr_iscdi=true