Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies
This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that som...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoforum 2004-09, Vol.35 (5), p.553-558 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 558 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Geoforum |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Berg, Lawrence D. |
description | This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as
geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37952016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718504000181</els_id><sourcerecordid>37952016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwF1AmtoRzHDc2E6iCglSJAZgtx7kElzQOdkrVf4-rwsTAdLrTe-_0PkIuKWQU6Ox6lbXoGuc36ywHKDKgGQA_IhMqyjyVTIpjMoGoTEsq-Ck5C2EFACUTckIWL0Z3tm-Tj95tO6xbvElGt9W-DolOjLejjYIkfmi9Ht53iWv-Xi2Gc3LS6C7gxc-ckreH-9f5Y7p8XjzN75apYQUdU15SmgPWpqhqkLIqChSCNTOhi1IzXles4ihzzgBYVQnOTIGoUTaU6f3KpuTqkDt497nBMKq1DQa7TvfoNkGxUvI8do3C2UFovAvBY6MGb9fa7xQFteemVuqXm9pzU0BV5BaNtwcjxhpfFr0KxmJvsLYezahqZ_-L-AaLX3rH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37952016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Berg, Lawrence D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berg, Lawrence D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as
geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anglo-American hegemony ; Cultural politics ; Geographic knowledges ; Geographic scale ; Geography ; Hierarchical space</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2004-09, Vol.35 (5), p.553-558</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718504000181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berg, Lawrence D.</creatorcontrib><title>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as
geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.</description><subject>Anglo-American hegemony</subject><subject>Cultural politics</subject><subject>Geographic knowledges</subject><subject>Geographic scale</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Hierarchical space</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwF1AmtoRzHDc2E6iCglSJAZgtx7kElzQOdkrVf4-rwsTAdLrTe-_0PkIuKWQU6Ox6lbXoGuc36ywHKDKgGQA_IhMqyjyVTIpjMoGoTEsq-Ck5C2EFACUTckIWL0Z3tm-Tj95tO6xbvElGt9W-DolOjLejjYIkfmi9Ht53iWv-Xi2Gc3LS6C7gxc-ckreH-9f5Y7p8XjzN75apYQUdU15SmgPWpqhqkLIqChSCNTOhi1IzXles4ihzzgBYVQnOTIGoUTaU6f3KpuTqkDt497nBMKq1DQa7TvfoNkGxUvI8do3C2UFovAvBY6MGb9fa7xQFteemVuqXm9pzU0BV5BaNtwcjxhpfFr0KxmJvsLYezahqZ_-L-AaLX3rH</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Berg, Lawrence D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</title><author>Berg, Lawrence D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-571120edc4bd099b44e883f68a47a35db3b5e9253003bb853c4eeae9f13ab8533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Anglo-American hegemony</topic><topic>Cultural politics</topic><topic>Geographic knowledges</topic><topic>Geographic scale</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Hierarchical space</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berg, Lawrence D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berg, Lawrence D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>553-558</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>This paper provides an analysis of the scale politics involved in the production of social-scientific geographic knowledge. I argue that critical Geographers need to acknowledge that ideas do not circulate unfettered or limited solely by their intellectual value. Instead, we must understand that some ideas are `attached' intimately to the places in which they originate while others circulate freely without attachment to specific places. Through such simple (dis)locations, geographic ideas get inserted into spaces of academic knowledge production that are shot through with scale politics. Ironically, such scalar processes produce a simple, transparent, abstract and hierarchical space of knowledge production that elides the complex spatial relations that we as
geographers are supposed to be so interested in understanding.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7185 |
ispartof | Geoforum, 2004-09, Vol.35 (5), p.553-558 |
issn | 0016-7185 1872-9398 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_37952016 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Anglo-American hegemony Cultural politics Geographic knowledges Geographic scale Geography Hierarchical space |
title | Scaling knowledge: towards a critical geography of critical geographies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scaling%20knowledge:%20towards%20a%20critical%20geography%20of%20critical%20geographies&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Berg,%20Lawrence%20D.&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=553-558&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37952016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37952016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718504000181&rfr_iscdi=true |